全面的多组学分析揭示了预测阿尔茨海默病的独特特征。

IF 2.8 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in bioinformatics Pub Date : 2024-06-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbinf.2024.1390607
Michael Vacher, Rodrigo Canovas, Simon M Laws, James D Doecke
{"title":"全面的多组学分析揭示了预测阿尔茨海默病的独特特征。","authors":"Michael Vacher, Rodrigo Canovas, Simon M Laws, James D Doecke","doi":"10.3389/fbinf.2024.1390607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), result from the combined influence of multiple biological and environmental factors. The integration of high-throughput data from multiple omics platforms can provide system overviews, improving our understanding of complex biological processes underlying human disease. In this study, integrated data from four omics platforms were used to characterise biological signatures of AD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study cohort consists of 455 participants (Control:148, Cases:307) from the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP). Genotype (SNP), methylation (CpG), RNA and proteomics data were collected, quality-controlled and pre-processed (SNP = 130; CpG = 83; RNA = 91; Proteomics = 119). Using a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)/AD combined as the target phenotype, we first used Partial Least Squares Regression as an unsupervised classification framework to assess the prediction capabilities for each omics dataset individually. We then used a variation of the sparse generalized canonical correlation analysis (sGCCA) to assess predictions of the combined datasets and identify multi-omics signatures characterising each group of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysing datasets individually we found methylation data provided the best predictions with an accuracy of 0.63 (95%CI = [0.54-0.71]), followed by RNA, 0.61 (95%CI = [0.52-0.69]), SNP, 0.59 (95%CI = [0.51-0.68]) and proteomics, 0.58 (95%CI = [0.51-0.67]). After integration of the four datasets, predictions were dramatically improved with a resulting accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI = [0.89-0.98]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of data from multiple platforms is a powerful approach to explore biological systems and better characterise the biological signatures of AD. The results suggest that integrative methods can identify biomarker panels with improved predictive performance compared to individual platforms alone. Further validation in independent cohorts is required to validate and refine the results presented in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73066,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","volume":"4 ","pages":"1390607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive multi-omics analysis reveals unique signatures to predict Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Vacher, Rodrigo Canovas, Simon M Laws, James D Doecke\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbinf.2024.1390607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), result from the combined influence of multiple biological and environmental factors. The integration of high-throughput data from multiple omics platforms can provide system overviews, improving our understanding of complex biological processes underlying human disease. In this study, integrated data from four omics platforms were used to characterise biological signatures of AD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study cohort consists of 455 participants (Control:148, Cases:307) from the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP). Genotype (SNP), methylation (CpG), RNA and proteomics data were collected, quality-controlled and pre-processed (SNP = 130; CpG = 83; RNA = 91; Proteomics = 119). Using a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)/AD combined as the target phenotype, we first used Partial Least Squares Regression as an unsupervised classification framework to assess the prediction capabilities for each omics dataset individually. We then used a variation of the sparse generalized canonical correlation analysis (sGCCA) to assess predictions of the combined datasets and identify multi-omics signatures characterising each group of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysing datasets individually we found methylation data provided the best predictions with an accuracy of 0.63 (95%CI = [0.54-0.71]), followed by RNA, 0.61 (95%CI = [0.52-0.69]), SNP, 0.59 (95%CI = [0.51-0.68]) and proteomics, 0.58 (95%CI = [0.51-0.67]). After integration of the four datasets, predictions were dramatically improved with a resulting accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI = [0.89-0.98]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of data from multiple platforms is a powerful approach to explore biological systems and better characterise the biological signatures of AD. The results suggest that integrative methods can identify biomarker panels with improved predictive performance compared to individual platforms alone. Further validation in independent cohorts is required to validate and refine the results presented in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1390607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2024.1390607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2024.1390607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)等复杂疾病是多种生物和环境因素共同影响的结果。整合来自多个 omics 平台的高通量数据可以提供系统概述,提高我们对人类疾病背后复杂生物过程的理解。在这项研究中,来自四个全息平台的整合数据被用来描述 AD 的生物学特征:研究队列由来自宗教团体研究和记忆与衰老项目(ROSMAP)的 455 名参与者组成(对照组:148 人,病例:307 人)。收集了基因型(SNP)、甲基化(CpG)、RNA和蛋白质组学数据,并进行了质量控制和预处理(SNP = 130;CpG = 83;RNA = 91;蛋白质组学 = 119)。以轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)/AD 合并诊断为目标表型,我们首先使用部分最小二乘法回归作为无监督分类框架,评估每个 omics 数据集的预测能力。然后,我们使用稀疏广义典型相关分析(sGCCA)的一种变体来评估合并数据集的预测结果,并确定每组参与者的多组学特征:对数据集进行单独分析后,我们发现甲基化数据提供了最佳预测,准确率为 0.63(95%CI = [0.54-0.71]),其次是 RNA,准确率为 0.61(95%CI = [0.52-0.69]),SNP,准确率为 0.59(95%CI = [0.51-0.68]),蛋白质组学,准确率为 0.58(95%CI = [0.51-0.67])。整合四个数据集后,预测结果大幅提高,准确率达到 0.95 (95%CI = [0.89-0.98]):结论:整合来自多个平台的数据是探索生物系统和更好地描述 AD 生物特征的有力方法。研究结果表明,与单个平台相比,整合方法能识别出预测性能更高的生物标记物面板。要验证和完善本研究提出的结果,还需要在独立队列中进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive multi-omics analysis reveals unique signatures to predict Alzheimer's disease.

Background: Complex disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), result from the combined influence of multiple biological and environmental factors. The integration of high-throughput data from multiple omics platforms can provide system overviews, improving our understanding of complex biological processes underlying human disease. In this study, integrated data from four omics platforms were used to characterise biological signatures of AD.

Method: The study cohort consists of 455 participants (Control:148, Cases:307) from the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP). Genotype (SNP), methylation (CpG), RNA and proteomics data were collected, quality-controlled and pre-processed (SNP = 130; CpG = 83; RNA = 91; Proteomics = 119). Using a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)/AD combined as the target phenotype, we first used Partial Least Squares Regression as an unsupervised classification framework to assess the prediction capabilities for each omics dataset individually. We then used a variation of the sparse generalized canonical correlation analysis (sGCCA) to assess predictions of the combined datasets and identify multi-omics signatures characterising each group of participants.

Results: Analysing datasets individually we found methylation data provided the best predictions with an accuracy of 0.63 (95%CI = [0.54-0.71]), followed by RNA, 0.61 (95%CI = [0.52-0.69]), SNP, 0.59 (95%CI = [0.51-0.68]) and proteomics, 0.58 (95%CI = [0.51-0.67]). After integration of the four datasets, predictions were dramatically improved with a resulting accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI = [0.89-0.98]).

Conclusion: The integration of data from multiple platforms is a powerful approach to explore biological systems and better characterise the biological signatures of AD. The results suggest that integrative methods can identify biomarker panels with improved predictive performance compared to individual platforms alone. Further validation in independent cohorts is required to validate and refine the results presented in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信