Gabriela Buccini, Cali Larrison, Smriti Neupane, Maria Palapa, Raquel Machado Schincaglia, Sara Brown, Muriel B. Gubert
{"title":"母乳喂养方式与家庭粮食不安全之间错综复杂的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gabriela Buccini, Cali Larrison, Smriti Neupane, Maria Palapa, Raquel Machado Schincaglia, Sara Brown, Muriel B. Gubert","doi":"10.1111/mcn.13696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Breastfeeding offers ideal food and nutrition for infants; however, structural barriers may amplify breastfeeding inequities. We aimed to identify whether household food insecurity (HFI) is associated with exclusive and continued breastfeeding (EBF and CBF) as recommended by the World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, literature searches using ‘breastfeeding’, ‘food insecurity’ and ‘infant’ terms were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health and LILACS from inception through November 2023, without language restrictions, yielding 1382 publications (PROSPERO:CRD42022329836). Predetermined eligibility criteria yielded the 12 included studies (nine cross-sectional and three cohorts). The risk of bias was assessed through the Effective Public Health Practice Project. Meta-analysis was performed for studies assessing EBF (<i>n</i> = 10), and metaregression was used to explore heterogeneity across studies. Prevalence of EBF ranged from 1.6% to 85.3%, with a lower prevalence among HFI. The pooled effect of the association between HFI and EBF presented an odds ratio (OR) of 0.61 (95% CI = 0.49–0.76) with consistent results across marginal (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55–0.94), moderate (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.41–0.84) and severe HFI (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.32–0.76). High heterogeneity was found only when HFI was dichotomized. The prevalence of CBF ranged from 35.4% to 78.0%, with inconsistent prevalence among HFI; a meta-analysis was not performed due to the low number of studies (<i>n</i> = 3). We concluded that HFI levels are associated with lower odds of EBF. Integrating service and policy-level strategies, such as screening, referrals, skilled breastfeeding counseling and access to comprehensive nutrition and social programs, could reduce structural inequities and promote adherence to the World Health Organization/UNICEF breastfeeding recommendations among food-insecure families.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.13696","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex intertwined association between breastfeeding practices and household food insecurity: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Buccini, Cali Larrison, Smriti Neupane, Maria Palapa, Raquel Machado Schincaglia, Sara Brown, Muriel B. Gubert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mcn.13696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Breastfeeding offers ideal food and nutrition for infants; however, structural barriers may amplify breastfeeding inequities. We aimed to identify whether household food insecurity (HFI) is associated with exclusive and continued breastfeeding (EBF and CBF) as recommended by the World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, literature searches using ‘breastfeeding’, ‘food insecurity’ and ‘infant’ terms were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health and LILACS from inception through November 2023, without language restrictions, yielding 1382 publications (PROSPERO:CRD42022329836). Predetermined eligibility criteria yielded the 12 included studies (nine cross-sectional and three cohorts). The risk of bias was assessed through the Effective Public Health Practice Project. Meta-analysis was performed for studies assessing EBF (<i>n</i> = 10), and metaregression was used to explore heterogeneity across studies. Prevalence of EBF ranged from 1.6% to 85.3%, with a lower prevalence among HFI. The pooled effect of the association between HFI and EBF presented an odds ratio (OR) of 0.61 (95% CI = 0.49–0.76) with consistent results across marginal (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55–0.94), moderate (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.41–0.84) and severe HFI (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.32–0.76). High heterogeneity was found only when HFI was dichotomized. The prevalence of CBF ranged from 35.4% to 78.0%, with inconsistent prevalence among HFI; a meta-analysis was not performed due to the low number of studies (<i>n</i> = 3). We concluded that HFI levels are associated with lower odds of EBF. Integrating service and policy-level strategies, such as screening, referrals, skilled breastfeeding counseling and access to comprehensive nutrition and social programs, could reduce structural inequities and promote adherence to the World Health Organization/UNICEF breastfeeding recommendations among food-insecure families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.13696\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mcn.13696\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mcn.13696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
母乳喂养为婴儿提供了理想的食物和营养;然而,结构性障碍可能会扩大母乳喂养的不平等。我们旨在根据世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会(UNICEF)在《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》中提出的建议,确定家庭粮食不安全(HFI)是否与纯母乳喂养和持续母乳喂养(EBF 和 CBF)有关、在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Global Health 和 LILACS 中使用 "母乳喂养"、"粮食不安全 "和 "婴儿 "等术语进行文献检索,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 11 月,没有语言限制,共检索到 1382 篇出版物(PROSPERO:CRD42022329836)。根据预先确定的资格标准,共纳入了 12 项研究(9 项横断面研究和 3 项队列研究)。通过有效公共卫生实践项目对偏倚风险进行了评估。对评估 EBF 的研究进行了 Meta 分析(n = 10),并使用元回归探讨了各研究之间的异质性。EBF的流行率从1.6%到85.3%不等,高危人群的流行率较低。HFI与EBF之间的关联效应的合计几率(OR)为0.61(95% CI = 0.49-0.76),在轻度(OR = 0.72,95% CI = 0.55-0.94)、中度(OR = 0.59,95% CI = 0.41-0.84)和重度HFI(OR = 0.49,95% CI = 0.32-0.76)中结果一致。只有当 HFI 被二分时,才会发现高度异质性。CBF 患病率从 35.4% 到 78.0%,HFI 患病率不一致;由于研究数量较少(n = 3),因此未进行荟萃分析。我们的结论是,HFI 水平与较低的 EBF 机率相关。整合服务和政策层面的策略,如筛查、转诊、熟练的母乳喂养咨询以及获得全面的营养和社会计划,可以减少结构性不平等,促进粮食不安全家庭遵守世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会的母乳喂养建议。
Complex intertwined association between breastfeeding practices and household food insecurity: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Breastfeeding offers ideal food and nutrition for infants; however, structural barriers may amplify breastfeeding inequities. We aimed to identify whether household food insecurity (HFI) is associated with exclusive and continued breastfeeding (EBF and CBF) as recommended by the World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, literature searches using ‘breastfeeding’, ‘food insecurity’ and ‘infant’ terms were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health and LILACS from inception through November 2023, without language restrictions, yielding 1382 publications (PROSPERO:CRD42022329836). Predetermined eligibility criteria yielded the 12 included studies (nine cross-sectional and three cohorts). The risk of bias was assessed through the Effective Public Health Practice Project. Meta-analysis was performed for studies assessing EBF (n = 10), and metaregression was used to explore heterogeneity across studies. Prevalence of EBF ranged from 1.6% to 85.3%, with a lower prevalence among HFI. The pooled effect of the association between HFI and EBF presented an odds ratio (OR) of 0.61 (95% CI = 0.49–0.76) with consistent results across marginal (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55–0.94), moderate (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.41–0.84) and severe HFI (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.32–0.76). High heterogeneity was found only when HFI was dichotomized. The prevalence of CBF ranged from 35.4% to 78.0%, with inconsistent prevalence among HFI; a meta-analysis was not performed due to the low number of studies (n = 3). We concluded that HFI levels are associated with lower odds of EBF. Integrating service and policy-level strategies, such as screening, referrals, skilled breastfeeding counseling and access to comprehensive nutrition and social programs, could reduce structural inequities and promote adherence to the World Health Organization/UNICEF breastfeeding recommendations among food-insecure families.
期刊介绍:
Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.