Thomas P. Bosch BSc , Felix Peuker BSc , Frank J.P. Beeres MD, PhD , Nicole van Veelen MD , Rogier Vermeulen MD , Björn C. Link MD, PhD , Reto Babst MD, PhD (Prof.) , Bryan J.M. van de Wall MD, PhD, MSc
{"title":"上肢骨折手术治疗患者的 6 周常规门诊:真的有必要吗?","authors":"Thomas P. Bosch BSc , Felix Peuker BSc , Frank J.P. Beeres MD, PhD , Nicole van Veelen MD , Rogier Vermeulen MD , Björn C. Link MD, PhD , Reto Babst MD, PhD (Prof.) , Bryan J.M. van de Wall MD, PhD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to the increasing burden on the heatlhcare system the usefulness of the routinely planned 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph in patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures, including clavicle, proximal humerus, humeral shaft, olecranon, radial shaft, and distal radius, should be investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures between 2019 and 2022 in a level 1 trauma center. The first outcome of interest was the incidence of abnormalities found on the radiograph taken at the 6-week outpatient visit. Abnormalities were defined as all differences between the intraoperative (or direct postoperative) and 6-week radiograph. In case an abnormality was detected, the hospital records were screened to determine its clinical consequence. The clinical consequences were categorized into requiring either additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed range of motion (ROM). The second outcome of interest was the incidence of deviations from the local standard postoperative treatment and follow-up protocol based on the 6-week outpatient visit as a whole. Deviations were also categorized into either requiring additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed ROM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 267 patients were included. Abnormalities on radiograph at 6 weeks postoperatively were found in only 10 (3.7%) patients, of which only 4 (1.5%) had clinical implications (in 3 patients extra imaging was required and in 1 patient it was necessary to deviate from standard weightbearing/ROM limitation regimen). The clinical/radiologic findings during the 6-week outpatient visit led to a deviation from standard in only 8 (3.0%) patients. Notably, the majority of these patients experienced symptoms suggestive of complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The routine 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph, after surgery for common upper extremity fractures, rarely has clinical consequences. It should be questioned whether these routine visits are necessary and whether a more selective approach should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 507-515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine 6-weeks outpatient visit in patients treated surgically for upper extremity fractures: is it truly necessary?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P. Bosch BSc , Felix Peuker BSc , Frank J.P. Beeres MD, PhD , Nicole van Veelen MD , Rogier Vermeulen MD , Björn C. Link MD, PhD , Reto Babst MD, PhD (Prof.) , Bryan J.M. van de Wall MD, PhD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to the increasing burden on the heatlhcare system the usefulness of the routinely planned 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph in patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures, including clavicle, proximal humerus, humeral shaft, olecranon, radial shaft, and distal radius, should be investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures between 2019 and 2022 in a level 1 trauma center. The first outcome of interest was the incidence of abnormalities found on the radiograph taken at the 6-week outpatient visit. Abnormalities were defined as all differences between the intraoperative (or direct postoperative) and 6-week radiograph. In case an abnormality was detected, the hospital records were screened to determine its clinical consequence. The clinical consequences were categorized into requiring either additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed range of motion (ROM). The second outcome of interest was the incidence of deviations from the local standard postoperative treatment and follow-up protocol based on the 6-week outpatient visit as a whole. Deviations were also categorized into either requiring additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed ROM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 267 patients were included. Abnormalities on radiograph at 6 weeks postoperatively were found in only 10 (3.7%) patients, of which only 4 (1.5%) had clinical implications (in 3 patients extra imaging was required and in 1 patient it was necessary to deviate from standard weightbearing/ROM limitation regimen). The clinical/radiologic findings during the 6-week outpatient visit led to a deviation from standard in only 8 (3.0%) patients. Notably, the majority of these patients experienced symptoms suggestive of complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The routine 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph, after surgery for common upper extremity fractures, rarely has clinical consequences. It should be questioned whether these routine visits are necessary and whether a more selective approach should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 507-515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274624004154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274624004154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的调查常规计划的六周门诊就诊和X光检查对最常见的上肢骨折(包括锁骨、肱骨近端、肱骨轴、肩胛骨、桡骨轴和桡骨远端)手术治疗患者的作用:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2019年至2022年期间在一级创伤中心接受最常见上肢骨折手术治疗的所有患者。第一项研究结果是在 6 周门诊就诊时 X 光片上发现异常的发生率。异常定义为术中(或术后直接)X 光片与 6 周 X 光片之间的所有差异。如果发现异常,则对医院记录进行筛查,以确定其临床后果。临床后果分为需要额外诊断、额外干预、改变术后标准固定、负重或允许活动范围(ROM)。第二项研究结果是,根据 6 周门诊的整体情况,偏离当地标准术后治疗和随访方案的发生率。偏离情况还分为需要额外诊断、额外干预、改变术后标准固定、负重或允许活动范围:结果:共纳入 267 名患者。术后6周X光检查发现异常的患者只有10例(3.7%),其中只有4例(1.5%)有临床影响(3例患者需要额外的影像学检查,1例患者需要偏离标准的负重/活动范围限制制度)。只有 8 名患者(3.0%)在 6 周门诊期间的临床/放射学检查结果导致偏离标准。值得注意的是,这些患者中的大多数都出现了提示并发症的症状:结论:普通上肢骨折术后 6 周的常规门诊和 X 光检查很少会产生临床后果。应质疑这些常规门诊是否必要,是否应考虑采取更具选择性的方法:证据级别:IV级;病例系列;预后研究。
Routine 6-weeks outpatient visit in patients treated surgically for upper extremity fractures: is it truly necessary?
Background
Due to the increasing burden on the heatlhcare system the usefulness of the routinely planned 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph in patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures, including clavicle, proximal humerus, humeral shaft, olecranon, radial shaft, and distal radius, should be investigated.
Method
This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures between 2019 and 2022 in a level 1 trauma center. The first outcome of interest was the incidence of abnormalities found on the radiograph taken at the 6-week outpatient visit. Abnormalities were defined as all differences between the intraoperative (or direct postoperative) and 6-week radiograph. In case an abnormality was detected, the hospital records were screened to determine its clinical consequence. The clinical consequences were categorized into requiring either additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed range of motion (ROM). The second outcome of interest was the incidence of deviations from the local standard postoperative treatment and follow-up protocol based on the 6-week outpatient visit as a whole. Deviations were also categorized into either requiring additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed ROM.
Results
A total of 267 patients were included. Abnormalities on radiograph at 6 weeks postoperatively were found in only 10 (3.7%) patients, of which only 4 (1.5%) had clinical implications (in 3 patients extra imaging was required and in 1 patient it was necessary to deviate from standard weightbearing/ROM limitation regimen). The clinical/radiologic findings during the 6-week outpatient visit led to a deviation from standard in only 8 (3.0%) patients. Notably, the majority of these patients experienced symptoms suggestive of complications.
Conclusion
The routine 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph, after surgery for common upper extremity fractures, rarely has clinical consequences. It should be questioned whether these routine visits are necessary and whether a more selective approach should be considered.
期刊介绍:
The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.