利用初级医疗机构中的患者风险预测得分和健康的社会决定因素预测医疗服务提供者的工作量。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787647
Yiqun Jiang, Yu-Li Huang, Alexandra Watral, Renaldo C Blocker, David R Rushlow
{"title":"利用初级医疗机构中的患者风险预测得分和健康的社会决定因素预测医疗服务提供者的工作量。","authors":"Yiqun Jiang, Yu-Li Huang, Alexandra Watral, Renaldo C Blocker, David R Rushlow","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Provider burnout due to workload is a significant concern in primary care settings. Workload for primary care providers encompasses both scheduled visit care and non-visit care interactions. These interactions are highly influenced by patients' health conditions or acuity, which can be measured by the Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) score. However, new patients typically have minimal health information beyond social determinants of health (SDOH) to determine ACG score.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aims to assess new patient workload by first predicting the ACG score using SDOH, age, and gender and then using this information to estimate the number of appointments (scheduled visit care) and non-visit care interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Two years of appointment data were collected for patients who had initial appointment requests in the first year and had the ACG score, appointment, and non-visit care counts in the subsequent year. State-of-art machine learning algorithms were employed to predict ACG scores and compared with current baseline estimation. Linear regression models were then used to predict appointments and non-visit care interactions, integrating demographic data, SDOH, and predicted ACG scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The machine learning methods showed promising results in predicting ACG scores. Besides the decision tree, all other methods performed at least 9% better in accuracy than the baseline approach which had an accuracy of 78%. Incorporating SDOH and predicted ACG scores also significantly improved the prediction for both appointments and non-visit care interactions. The <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> values increased by 95.2 and 93.8%, respectively. Furthermore, age, smoking tobacco, family history, gender, usage of injection birth control, and ACG were significant factors for determining appointments. SDOH factors such as tobacco usage, physical exercise, education level, and group activities were strongly correlated with non-visit care interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The study highlights the importance of SDOH and predicted ACG scores in predicting provider workload in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Provider Workload Using Predicted Patient Risk Score and Social Determinants of Health in Primary Care Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Yiqun Jiang, Yu-Li Huang, Alexandra Watral, Renaldo C Blocker, David R Rushlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Provider burnout due to workload is a significant concern in primary care settings. Workload for primary care providers encompasses both scheduled visit care and non-visit care interactions. These interactions are highly influenced by patients' health conditions or acuity, which can be measured by the Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) score. However, new patients typically have minimal health information beyond social determinants of health (SDOH) to determine ACG score.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aims to assess new patient workload by first predicting the ACG score using SDOH, age, and gender and then using this information to estimate the number of appointments (scheduled visit care) and non-visit care interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Two years of appointment data were collected for patients who had initial appointment requests in the first year and had the ACG score, appointment, and non-visit care counts in the subsequent year. State-of-art machine learning algorithms were employed to predict ACG scores and compared with current baseline estimation. Linear regression models were then used to predict appointments and non-visit care interactions, integrating demographic data, SDOH, and predicted ACG scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The machine learning methods showed promising results in predicting ACG scores. Besides the decision tree, all other methods performed at least 9% better in accuracy than the baseline approach which had an accuracy of 78%. Incorporating SDOH and predicted ACG scores also significantly improved the prediction for both appointments and non-visit care interactions. The <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> values increased by 95.2 and 93.8%, respectively. Furthermore, age, smoking tobacco, family history, gender, usage of injection birth control, and ACG were significant factors for determining appointments. SDOH factors such as tobacco usage, physical exercise, education level, and group activities were strongly correlated with non-visit care interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The study highlights the importance of SDOH and predicted ACG scores in predicting provider workload in primary care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787647\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在初级医疗机构中,因工作量而导致的医疗服务提供者倦怠是一个令人严重关切的问题。初级医疗服务提供者的工作量包括预定的就诊护理和非就诊护理互动。这些互动在很大程度上受患者健康状况或病情严重程度的影响,患者健康状况或病情严重程度可通过调整后临床组(ACG)评分来衡量。然而,新患者除了健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)外,通常只有极少的健康信息可用于确定 ACG 分数:本研究旨在评估新患者的工作量,首先利用 SDOH、年龄和性别预测 ACG 分数,然后利用这些信息估算预约次数(预定就诊护理)和非就诊护理互动次数:方法:我们收集了患者两年的预约数据,这些患者在第一年提出了首次预约请求,并在随后一年获得了 ACG 分数、预约和非就诊护理次数。采用最先进的机器学习算法预测 ACG 分数,并与当前的基线估计值进行比较。然后使用线性回归模型来预测预约和非就诊护理的相互作用,并将人口统计学数据、SDOH 和预测的 ACG 分数整合在一起:结果:机器学习方法在预测 ACG 分数方面显示出良好的效果。除决策树外,所有其他方法的准确率都比基线方法高出至少 9%,基线方法的准确率为 78%。纳入 SDOH 和预测的 ACG 分数也显著提高了对预约和非就诊护理互动的预测。R 2 值分别提高了 95.2% 和 93.8%。此外,年龄、吸烟、家族史、性别、注射避孕药的使用情况和 ACG 都是决定预约的重要因素。烟草使用、体育锻炼、教育水平和团体活动等 SDOH 因素与非就诊护理互动密切相关:该研究强调了 SDOH 和 ACG 预测得分在预测初级医疗机构医疗服务提供者工作量方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Provider Workload Using Predicted Patient Risk Score and Social Determinants of Health in Primary Care Setting.

Background:  Provider burnout due to workload is a significant concern in primary care settings. Workload for primary care providers encompasses both scheduled visit care and non-visit care interactions. These interactions are highly influenced by patients' health conditions or acuity, which can be measured by the Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) score. However, new patients typically have minimal health information beyond social determinants of health (SDOH) to determine ACG score.

Objectives:  This study aims to assess new patient workload by first predicting the ACG score using SDOH, age, and gender and then using this information to estimate the number of appointments (scheduled visit care) and non-visit care interactions.

Methods:  Two years of appointment data were collected for patients who had initial appointment requests in the first year and had the ACG score, appointment, and non-visit care counts in the subsequent year. State-of-art machine learning algorithms were employed to predict ACG scores and compared with current baseline estimation. Linear regression models were then used to predict appointments and non-visit care interactions, integrating demographic data, SDOH, and predicted ACG scores.

Results:  The machine learning methods showed promising results in predicting ACG scores. Besides the decision tree, all other methods performed at least 9% better in accuracy than the baseline approach which had an accuracy of 78%. Incorporating SDOH and predicted ACG scores also significantly improved the prediction for both appointments and non-visit care interactions. The R 2 values increased by 95.2 and 93.8%, respectively. Furthermore, age, smoking tobacco, family history, gender, usage of injection birth control, and ACG were significant factors for determining appointments. SDOH factors such as tobacco usage, physical exercise, education level, and group activities were strongly correlated with non-visit care interactions.

Conclusion:  The study highlights the importance of SDOH and predicted ACG scores in predicting provider workload in primary care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信