拒绝痴呆症患者对死亡的渴望:为什么痴呆症被排除在澳大利亚自愿协助死亡立法之外?

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Amee Baird
{"title":"拒绝痴呆症患者对死亡的渴望:为什么痴呆症被排除在澳大利亚自愿协助死亡立法之外?","authors":"Amee Baird","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Euthanasia in the form of Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) is legal in all Australian States, but current eligibility criteria preclude access to people with dementia. This article discusses Australian VAD eligibility criteria that are problematic for people with dementia: (1) time until death within 12 months, (2) decision-making capacity for VAD, and (3) determination of intolerable suffering. Legislation in the Netherlands allows VAD for people with dementia. The challenges and philosophical issues raised by such cases are explored. It is proposed that the unique nature of dementia in its various forms warrants the formulation of dementia-specific VAD eligibility criteria. A case could be brought to challenge the denial of access to VAD of people with dementia on the basis that their exclusion is discriminatory and an abuse of human rights. If such a challenge was successful, it could form a common law precedent to allow people with dementia access to VAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"31 2","pages":"386-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Denial of Desire for Death in Dementia: Why Is Dementia Excluded from Australian Voluntary Assisted Dying Legislation?\",\"authors\":\"Amee Baird\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Euthanasia in the form of Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) is legal in all Australian States, but current eligibility criteria preclude access to people with dementia. This article discusses Australian VAD eligibility criteria that are problematic for people with dementia: (1) time until death within 12 months, (2) decision-making capacity for VAD, and (3) determination of intolerable suffering. Legislation in the Netherlands allows VAD for people with dementia. The challenges and philosophical issues raised by such cases are explored. It is proposed that the unique nature of dementia in its various forms warrants the formulation of dementia-specific VAD eligibility criteria. A case could be brought to challenge the denial of access to VAD of people with dementia on the basis that their exclusion is discriminatory and an abuse of human rights. If such a challenge was successful, it could form a common law precedent to allow people with dementia access to VAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"386-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以自愿协助死亡(VAD)形式进行的安乐死在澳大利亚各州都是合法的,但目前的资格标准却不允许痴呆症患者使用。本文讨论了澳大利亚对痴呆症患者而言存在问题的 VAD 资格标准:(1)12 个月内的死亡时间,(2)VAD 的决策能力,以及(3)无法忍受的痛苦的判定。荷兰的立法允许对痴呆症患者进行 VAD。本文探讨了此类案例带来的挑战和哲学问题。建议根据痴呆症各种形式的独特性质,制定痴呆症专用的 VAD 资格标准。对于拒绝向痴呆症患者提供自愿性评估的做法,可以提出质疑,理由是将他们排除在外是一种歧视和对人权的践踏。如果这种质疑成功,就可以形成普通法先例,允许痴呆症患者获得自愿性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Denial of Desire for Death in Dementia: Why Is Dementia Excluded from Australian Voluntary Assisted Dying Legislation?

Euthanasia in the form of Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) is legal in all Australian States, but current eligibility criteria preclude access to people with dementia. This article discusses Australian VAD eligibility criteria that are problematic for people with dementia: (1) time until death within 12 months, (2) decision-making capacity for VAD, and (3) determination of intolerable suffering. Legislation in the Netherlands allows VAD for people with dementia. The challenges and philosophical issues raised by such cases are explored. It is proposed that the unique nature of dementia in its various forms warrants the formulation of dementia-specific VAD eligibility criteria. A case could be brought to challenge the denial of access to VAD of people with dementia on the basis that their exclusion is discriminatory and an abuse of human rights. If such a challenge was successful, it could form a common law precedent to allow people with dementia access to VAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信