开发基于茶油山茶壳的轻质波纹夹芯板:实验和数值性能的相关性

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Kamran Choupani Chaydarreh, Jingyi Tan, Yonghui Zhou, Yongtao Li, Chuanshuang Hu
{"title":"开发基于茶油山茶壳的轻质波纹夹芯板:实验和数值性能的相关性","authors":"Kamran Choupani Chaydarreh, Jingyi Tan, Yonghui Zhou, Yongtao Li, Chuanshuang Hu","doi":"10.1186/s10086-024-02144-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents an experimental and numerical comparison between the mechanical performance of a lightweight corrugated sandwich panel based on the tea oil camellia shell (TOCS). Hence, TOCS was mixed in two groups with Poplar particles and fibers. After that, in the experimental part, the conventional mechanical tests, including the 3-point bending test, flatwise compression, dowel bearing, and screw resistance, and in the numerical part, finite element analysis (FEA), including the normal, maximum principal, and equivalent (von Mises) stress by Ansys Mechanical software carried out. The specimens for experimental and numerical tests were prepared in transverse and longitudinal directions. Before that, the engineering data (shear modulus, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio) for improving the FEA simulation were obtained from TOCS-based flat panels fabricated with a mixture of Poplar particles and fibers. The results of FEA are used to compare the mechanical behavior and failure mechanism with the results of experimental tests. According to the mean values of bending stiffness and maximum bending moment, sandwich panels made with 100% particles demonstrated an advantage in both directions. Nevertheless, the compression strength and screw resistance showed the same trend, but the dowel bearing showed higher values for panels made with fibers. The observed results of equivalent (von Mises) stress indicated a coloration with the results of failure mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":17664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wood Science","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a lightweight corrugated sandwich panel based on tea oil camellia shell: correlation of experimental and numerical performance\",\"authors\":\"Kamran Choupani Chaydarreh, Jingyi Tan, Yonghui Zhou, Yongtao Li, Chuanshuang Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10086-024-02144-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents an experimental and numerical comparison between the mechanical performance of a lightweight corrugated sandwich panel based on the tea oil camellia shell (TOCS). Hence, TOCS was mixed in two groups with Poplar particles and fibers. After that, in the experimental part, the conventional mechanical tests, including the 3-point bending test, flatwise compression, dowel bearing, and screw resistance, and in the numerical part, finite element analysis (FEA), including the normal, maximum principal, and equivalent (von Mises) stress by Ansys Mechanical software carried out. The specimens for experimental and numerical tests were prepared in transverse and longitudinal directions. Before that, the engineering data (shear modulus, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio) for improving the FEA simulation were obtained from TOCS-based flat panels fabricated with a mixture of Poplar particles and fibers. The results of FEA are used to compare the mechanical behavior and failure mechanism with the results of experimental tests. According to the mean values of bending stiffness and maximum bending moment, sandwich panels made with 100% particles demonstrated an advantage in both directions. Nevertheless, the compression strength and screw resistance showed the same trend, but the dowel bearing showed higher values for panels made with fibers. The observed results of equivalent (von Mises) stress indicated a coloration with the results of failure mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wood Science\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wood Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-024-02144-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wood Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-024-02144-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对基于茶油山茶壳(TOCS)的轻质波纹夹芯板的机械性能进行了实验和数值比较。因此,茶油山茶壳与白杨颗粒和纤维分为两组混合。随后,在实验部分,进行了常规力学测试,包括三点弯曲测试、平向压缩、镙栓承载和螺钉阻力;在数值部分,使用 Ansys Mechanical 软件进行了有限元分析(FEA),包括法向应力、最大主应力和等效(von Mises)应力。用于实验和数值测试的试样是在横向和纵向制备的。在此之前,从使用杨木颗粒和纤维混合物制造的基于 TOCS 的平板上获取了工程数据(剪切模量、杨氏模量和泊松比),用于改进有限元分析模拟。有限元分析的结果用于将力学行为和破坏机制与实验测试结果进行比较。根据弯曲刚度和最大弯矩的平均值,100% 颗粒制成的夹层板在两个方向上都具有优势。尽管如此,压缩强度和螺钉阻力显示出相同的趋势,但纤维夹芯板的镙栓承载力显示出更高的值。观察到的等效(冯-米塞斯)应力结果与失效机理结果呈现出某种色彩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a lightweight corrugated sandwich panel based on tea oil camellia shell: correlation of experimental and numerical performance
This study presents an experimental and numerical comparison between the mechanical performance of a lightweight corrugated sandwich panel based on the tea oil camellia shell (TOCS). Hence, TOCS was mixed in two groups with Poplar particles and fibers. After that, in the experimental part, the conventional mechanical tests, including the 3-point bending test, flatwise compression, dowel bearing, and screw resistance, and in the numerical part, finite element analysis (FEA), including the normal, maximum principal, and equivalent (von Mises) stress by Ansys Mechanical software carried out. The specimens for experimental and numerical tests were prepared in transverse and longitudinal directions. Before that, the engineering data (shear modulus, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio) for improving the FEA simulation were obtained from TOCS-based flat panels fabricated with a mixture of Poplar particles and fibers. The results of FEA are used to compare the mechanical behavior and failure mechanism with the results of experimental tests. According to the mean values of bending stiffness and maximum bending moment, sandwich panels made with 100% particles demonstrated an advantage in both directions. Nevertheless, the compression strength and screw resistance showed the same trend, but the dowel bearing showed higher values for panels made with fibers. The observed results of equivalent (von Mises) stress indicated a coloration with the results of failure mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wood Science
Journal of Wood Science 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wood Science is the official journal of the Japan Wood Research Society. This journal provides an international forum for the exchange of knowledge and the discussion of current issues in wood and its utilization. The journal publishes original articles on basic and applied research dealing with the science, technology, and engineering of wood, wood components, wood and wood-based products, and wood constructions. Articles concerned with pulp and paper, fiber resources from non-woody plants, wood-inhabiting insects and fungi, wood biomass, and environmental and ecological issues in forest products are also included. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes review articles on selected topics concerning wood science and related fields. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts from any country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信