{"title":"巴西统一医疗系统一家医院在胃癌手术治疗中采用的围手术期化疗、辅助化疗和辅助化放疗。","authors":"Eduardo Marcucci Pracucho, Renato Morato Zanatto, Júnea Caris de Oliveira, Luiz Roberto Lopes","doi":"10.1590/0102-6720202400017e1810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the preference for multimodal treatment for gastric cancer, abandonment of chemotherapy treatment as well as the need for upfront surgery in obstructed patients brings negative impacts on the treatment. The difficulty of accessing treatment in specialized centers in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) scenario is an aggravating factor.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify advantages, prognostic factors, complications, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies survival in gastric cancer treatment in SUS setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study included 81 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment according to INT0116 trial (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy), CLASSIC trial (adjuvant chemotherapy), FLOT4-AIO trial (perioperative chemotherapy), and surgery with curative intention (R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy) in a single cancer center between 2015 and 2020. Individuals with other histological types, gastric stump, esophageal cancer, other treatment protocols, and stage Ia or IV were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were grouped into FLOT4-AIO (26 patients), CLASSIC (25 patients), and INT0116 (30 patients). The average age was 61 years old. More than 60% of patients had pathological stage III. The treatment completion rate was 56%. The pathological complete response rate of the FLOT4-AIO group was 7.7%. Among the prognostic factors that impacted overall survival and disease-free survival were alcoholism, early postoperative complications, and anatomopathological status pN2 and pN3. The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.9%, with the CLASSIC subgroup having the best survival (79.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment strategy for gastric cancer varies according to the need for initial surgery. The CLASSIC subgroup had better overall survival and disease-free survival. The INT0116 regimen also protected against mortality, but not with statistical significance. Although FLOT4-AIO is the preferred treatment, the difficulty in carrying out neoadjuvant treatment in SUS scenario had a negative impact on the results due to the criticality of food intake and worse treatment tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72298,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","volume":"37 ","pages":"e1810"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND ADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER IN A HOSPITAL OF THE BRAZILIAN UNIFIED HEALTH SYSTEM.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Marcucci Pracucho, Renato Morato Zanatto, Júnea Caris de Oliveira, Luiz Roberto Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0102-6720202400017e1810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the preference for multimodal treatment for gastric cancer, abandonment of chemotherapy treatment as well as the need for upfront surgery in obstructed patients brings negative impacts on the treatment. The difficulty of accessing treatment in specialized centers in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) scenario is an aggravating factor.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify advantages, prognostic factors, complications, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies survival in gastric cancer treatment in SUS setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study included 81 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment according to INT0116 trial (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy), CLASSIC trial (adjuvant chemotherapy), FLOT4-AIO trial (perioperative chemotherapy), and surgery with curative intention (R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy) in a single cancer center between 2015 and 2020. Individuals with other histological types, gastric stump, esophageal cancer, other treatment protocols, and stage Ia or IV were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were grouped into FLOT4-AIO (26 patients), CLASSIC (25 patients), and INT0116 (30 patients). The average age was 61 years old. More than 60% of patients had pathological stage III. The treatment completion rate was 56%. The pathological complete response rate of the FLOT4-AIO group was 7.7%. Among the prognostic factors that impacted overall survival and disease-free survival were alcoholism, early postoperative complications, and anatomopathological status pN2 and pN3. The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.9%, with the CLASSIC subgroup having the best survival (79.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment strategy for gastric cancer varies according to the need for initial surgery. The CLASSIC subgroup had better overall survival and disease-free survival. The INT0116 regimen also protected against mortality, but not with statistical significance. Although FLOT4-AIO is the preferred treatment, the difficulty in carrying out neoadjuvant treatment in SUS scenario had a negative impact on the results due to the criticality of food intake and worse treatment tolerance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"e1810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720202400017e1810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720202400017e1810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管人们倾向于对胃癌进行多模式治疗,但放弃化疗以及需要对梗阻患者进行前期手术给治疗带来了负面影响。目的:确定巴西统一国家医疗系统(SUS)中胃癌治疗的优势、预后因素、并发症以及新辅助疗法和辅助疗法的存活率:该回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2020年间在一家癌症中心接受INT0116试验(辅助化放疗)、CLASSIC试验(辅助化疗)、FLOT4-AIO试验(围手术期化疗)和治愈性手术(R0切除和D2淋巴结切除)治疗的81例胃腺癌患者。排除了其他组织学类型、胃残端、食管癌、其他治疗方案以及Ia期或IV期的患者:患者分为FLOT4-AIO(26例)、CLASSIC(25例)和INT0116(30例)。平均年龄为 61 岁。超过 60% 的患者病理分期为 III 期。治疗完成率为 56%。FLOT4-AIO组的病理完全反应率为7.7%。影响总生存率和无病生存率的预后因素包括酗酒、术后早期并发症以及解剖病理状态pN2和pN3。3年总生存率为64.9%,CLASSIC亚组的生存率最高(79.8%):结论:胃癌的治疗策略因初次手术的需要而异。CLASSIC亚组的总生存率和无病生存率更高。INT0116方案也能降低死亡率,但没有统计学意义。尽管FLOT4-AIO是首选治疗方案,但由于食物摄入的重要性和较差的治疗耐受性,在SUS情况下进行新辅助治疗的难度对结果产生了负面影响。
PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND ADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER IN A HOSPITAL OF THE BRAZILIAN UNIFIED HEALTH SYSTEM.
Background: Despite the preference for multimodal treatment for gastric cancer, abandonment of chemotherapy treatment as well as the need for upfront surgery in obstructed patients brings negative impacts on the treatment. The difficulty of accessing treatment in specialized centers in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) scenario is an aggravating factor.
Aims: To identify advantages, prognostic factors, complications, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies survival in gastric cancer treatment in SUS setting.
Methods: The retrospective study included 81 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment according to INT0116 trial (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy), CLASSIC trial (adjuvant chemotherapy), FLOT4-AIO trial (perioperative chemotherapy), and surgery with curative intention (R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy) in a single cancer center between 2015 and 2020. Individuals with other histological types, gastric stump, esophageal cancer, other treatment protocols, and stage Ia or IV were excluded.
Results: Patients were grouped into FLOT4-AIO (26 patients), CLASSIC (25 patients), and INT0116 (30 patients). The average age was 61 years old. More than 60% of patients had pathological stage III. The treatment completion rate was 56%. The pathological complete response rate of the FLOT4-AIO group was 7.7%. Among the prognostic factors that impacted overall survival and disease-free survival were alcoholism, early postoperative complications, and anatomopathological status pN2 and pN3. The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.9%, with the CLASSIC subgroup having the best survival (79.8%).
Conclusions: The treatment strategy for gastric cancer varies according to the need for initial surgery. The CLASSIC subgroup had better overall survival and disease-free survival. The INT0116 regimen also protected against mortality, but not with statistical significance. Although FLOT4-AIO is the preferred treatment, the difficulty in carrying out neoadjuvant treatment in SUS scenario had a negative impact on the results due to the criticality of food intake and worse treatment tolerance.