基于深度学习的自动分割(DLAS)模型对直肠癌放疗中临床靶体积(CTV)和危险器官(OAR)的局部微调和临床评估。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jianhao Geng, Xin Sui, Rongxu Du, Jialin Feng, Ruoxi Wang, Meijiao Wang, Kaining Yao, Qi Chen, Lu Bai, Shaobin Wang, Yongheng Li, Hao Wu, Xiangmin Hu, Yi Du
{"title":"基于深度学习的自动分割(DLAS)模型对直肠癌放疗中临床靶体积(CTV)和危险器官(OAR)的局部微调和临床评估。","authors":"Jianhao Geng, Xin Sui, Rongxu Du, Jialin Feng, Ruoxi Wang, Meijiao Wang, Kaining Yao, Qi Chen, Lu Bai, Shaobin Wang, Yongheng Li, Hao Wu, Xiangmin Hu, Yi Du","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02463-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Various deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) models have been proposed, some of which have been commercialized. However, the issue of performance degradation is notable when pretrained models are deployed in the clinic. This study aims to enhance precision of a popular commercial DLAS product in rectal cancer radiotherapy by localized fine-tuning, addressing challenges in practicality and generalizability in real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 120 Stage II/III mid-low rectal cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into three datasets: training (n = 60), external validation (ExVal, n = 30), and generalizability evaluation (GenEva, n = 30) datasets respectively. The patients in the training and ExVal dataset were acquired on the same CT simulator, while those in GenEva were on a different CT simulator. The commercial DLAS software was first localized fine-tuned (LFT) for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) using the training data, and then validated on ExVal and GenEva respectively. Performance evaluation involved comparing the LFT model with the vendor-provided pretrained model (VPM) against ground truth contours, using metrics like Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th Hausdorff distance (95HD), sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFT significantly improved CTV delineation accuracy (p < 0.05) with LFT outperforming VPM in target volume, DSC, 95HD and specificity. Both models exhibited adequate accuracy for bladder and femoral heads, and LFT demonstrated significant enhancement in segmenting the more complex small intestine. We did not identify performance degradation when LFT and VPM models were applied in the GenEva dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The necessity and potential benefits of LFT DLAS towards institution-specific model adaption is underscored. The commercial DLAS software exhibits superior accuracy once localized fine-tuned, and is highly robust to imaging equipment changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Localized fine-tuning and clinical evaluation of deep-learning based auto-segmentation (DLAS) model for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) in rectal cancer radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jianhao Geng, Xin Sui, Rongxu Du, Jialin Feng, Ruoxi Wang, Meijiao Wang, Kaining Yao, Qi Chen, Lu Bai, Shaobin Wang, Yongheng Li, Hao Wu, Xiangmin Hu, Yi Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02463-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Various deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) models have been proposed, some of which have been commercialized. However, the issue of performance degradation is notable when pretrained models are deployed in the clinic. This study aims to enhance precision of a popular commercial DLAS product in rectal cancer radiotherapy by localized fine-tuning, addressing challenges in practicality and generalizability in real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 120 Stage II/III mid-low rectal cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into three datasets: training (n = 60), external validation (ExVal, n = 30), and generalizability evaluation (GenEva, n = 30) datasets respectively. The patients in the training and ExVal dataset were acquired on the same CT simulator, while those in GenEva were on a different CT simulator. The commercial DLAS software was first localized fine-tuned (LFT) for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) using the training data, and then validated on ExVal and GenEva respectively. Performance evaluation involved comparing the LFT model with the vendor-provided pretrained model (VPM) against ground truth contours, using metrics like Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th Hausdorff distance (95HD), sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFT significantly improved CTV delineation accuracy (p < 0.05) with LFT outperforming VPM in target volume, DSC, 95HD and specificity. Both models exhibited adequate accuracy for bladder and femoral heads, and LFT demonstrated significant enhancement in segmenting the more complex small intestine. We did not identify performance degradation when LFT and VPM models were applied in the GenEva dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The necessity and potential benefits of LFT DLAS towards institution-specific model adaption is underscored. The commercial DLAS software exhibits superior accuracy once localized fine-tuned, and is highly robust to imaging equipment changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02463-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02463-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:目前已经提出了多种深度学习自动分区(DLAS)模型,其中一些已经商业化。然而,在临床中部署预训练模型时,性能下降的问题很明显。本研究旨在通过局部微调提高直肠癌放疗中流行的商业 DLAS 产品的精确度,解决实际临床环境中的实用性和通用性挑战:回顾性招募了120名II/III期中低位直肠癌患者,并将其分为三个数据集:训练数据集(n = 60)、外部验证数据集(ExVal,n = 30)和可推广性评估数据集(GenEva,n = 30)。训练数据集和 ExVal 数据集中的患者是在同一台 CT 模拟器上采集的,而 GenEva 数据集中的患者是在另一台 CT 模拟器上采集的。首先使用训练数据对商用 DLAS 软件进行临床靶体积(CTV)和风险器官(OAR)的定位微调(LFT),然后分别在 ExVal 和 GenEva 上进行验证。性能评估包括比较 LFT 模型和供应商提供的预训练模型(VPM)与地面实况轮廓,使用的指标包括 Dice 相似性系数(DSC)、95th Hausdorff 距离(95HD)、灵敏度和特异性:结果:LFT 明显提高了 CTV 划分的准确性(PLFT DLAS对特定机构模型适应性的必要性和潜在益处得到了强调。商业 DLAS 软件在定位微调后显示出卓越的准确性,并且对成像设备的变化具有很强的鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Localized fine-tuning and clinical evaluation of deep-learning based auto-segmentation (DLAS) model for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) in rectal cancer radiotherapy.

Background and purpose: Various deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) models have been proposed, some of which have been commercialized. However, the issue of performance degradation is notable when pretrained models are deployed in the clinic. This study aims to enhance precision of a popular commercial DLAS product in rectal cancer radiotherapy by localized fine-tuning, addressing challenges in practicality and generalizability in real-world clinical settings.

Materials and methods: A total of 120 Stage II/III mid-low rectal cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into three datasets: training (n = 60), external validation (ExVal, n = 30), and generalizability evaluation (GenEva, n = 30) datasets respectively. The patients in the training and ExVal dataset were acquired on the same CT simulator, while those in GenEva were on a different CT simulator. The commercial DLAS software was first localized fine-tuned (LFT) for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) using the training data, and then validated on ExVal and GenEva respectively. Performance evaluation involved comparing the LFT model with the vendor-provided pretrained model (VPM) against ground truth contours, using metrics like Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th Hausdorff distance (95HD), sensitivity and specificity.

Results: LFT significantly improved CTV delineation accuracy (p < 0.05) with LFT outperforming VPM in target volume, DSC, 95HD and specificity. Both models exhibited adequate accuracy for bladder and femoral heads, and LFT demonstrated significant enhancement in segmenting the more complex small intestine. We did not identify performance degradation when LFT and VPM models were applied in the GenEva dataset.

Conclusions: The necessity and potential benefits of LFT DLAS towards institution-specific model adaption is underscored. The commercial DLAS software exhibits superior accuracy once localized fine-tuned, and is highly robust to imaging equipment changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信