SERENE ER 分析第 2 部分 SERENE-UC:针对中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者的阿达木单抗高剂量与标准剂量方案的暴露-反应分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sven Stodtmann, Mong-Jen Chen, Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla, Tricia K. Finney-Hayward, Jasmina Kalabic, Nael M. Mostafa
{"title":"SERENE ER 分析第 2 部分 SERENE-UC:针对中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者的阿达木单抗高剂量与标准剂量方案的暴露-反应分析。","authors":"Sven Stodtmann,&nbsp;Mong-Jen Chen,&nbsp;Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla,&nbsp;Tricia K. Finney-Hayward,&nbsp;Jasmina Kalabic,&nbsp;Nael M. Mostafa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>SERENE UC (NCT02065622) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction regimen improved patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) response, but a flat dose-response relationship was found in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response (ER) relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients’ baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the efficacy endpoints (clinical remission, endoscopic remission, endoscopic improvement) at weeks 8 and 52. In the induction study, an increasing ER trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens was shown, suggesting average concentration (C<sub>avg</sub>) had a significant impact on primary efficacy endpoints within each group. However, data were not described by a single ER curve. Using inverse effective clearance as the exposure metric described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. Patients with inherently lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better. The patient response rates at week 52 showed no heterogeneity. A short-term increase in adalimumab dose did not drive better responses for induction, and apparent ER relationships were better explained by patient-inherent lower clearance. Conversely, during maintenance up to week 52, increasing the concentration via dose translated to better responses more robustly. The ER findings for SERENE UC were consistent with SERENE CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"13 9","pages":"1033-1043"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SERENE ER Analysis Part 2 SERENE-UC: Exposure-response Analysis of Higher Versus Standard Adalimumab Dosing Regimens for Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis\",\"authors\":\"Sven Stodtmann,&nbsp;Mong-Jen Chen,&nbsp;Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla,&nbsp;Tricia K. Finney-Hayward,&nbsp;Jasmina Kalabic,&nbsp;Nael M. Mostafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>SERENE UC (NCT02065622) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction regimen improved patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) response, but a flat dose-response relationship was found in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response (ER) relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients’ baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the efficacy endpoints (clinical remission, endoscopic remission, endoscopic improvement) at weeks 8 and 52. In the induction study, an increasing ER trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens was shown, suggesting average concentration (C<sub>avg</sub>) had a significant impact on primary efficacy endpoints within each group. However, data were not described by a single ER curve. Using inverse effective clearance as the exposure metric described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. Patients with inherently lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better. The patient response rates at week 52 showed no heterogeneity. A short-term increase in adalimumab dose did not drive better responses for induction, and apparent ER relationships were better explained by patient-inherent lower clearance. Conversely, during maintenance up to week 52, increasing the concentration via dose translated to better responses more robustly. The ER findings for SERENE UC were consistent with SERENE CD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"1033-1043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1437\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SERENE UC(NCT02065622)评估了较高的阿达木单抗诱导方案是否能改善溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的反应,但在诱导研究中发现剂量-反应关系平淡。考虑到患者的基线特征,我们调查了诱导和维持研究中的暴露-反应(ER)关系。我们使用已建立的群体药代动力学模型模拟了阿达木单抗的暴露量。使用多变量逻辑回归评估第8周和第52周的疗效终点(临床缓解、内镜缓解、内镜改善)。在诱导研究中,ER呈上升趋势,诱导方案之间存在异质性,表明平均浓度(Cavg)对各组的主要疗效终点有显著影响。然而,数据并不能用单一的ER曲线来描述。使用逆有效清除率作为暴露指标,可以用一条曲线描述不同诱导方案的趋势。阿达木单抗有效清除率较低的患者反应较好。第52周时的患者反应率没有显示出异质性。阿达木单抗剂量的短期增加并不能改善诱导治疗的反应,患者固有的较低清除率更能解释明显的ER关系。相反,在第52周之前的维持治疗期间,通过剂量增加阿达木单抗浓度能更有效地改善反应。SERENE UC的ER结果与SERENE CD一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SERENE ER Analysis Part 2 SERENE-UC: Exposure-response Analysis of Higher Versus Standard Adalimumab Dosing Regimens for Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

SERENE UC (NCT02065622) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction regimen improved patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) response, but a flat dose-response relationship was found in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response (ER) relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients’ baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the efficacy endpoints (clinical remission, endoscopic remission, endoscopic improvement) at weeks 8 and 52. In the induction study, an increasing ER trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens was shown, suggesting average concentration (Cavg) had a significant impact on primary efficacy endpoints within each group. However, data were not described by a single ER curve. Using inverse effective clearance as the exposure metric described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. Patients with inherently lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better. The patient response rates at week 52 showed no heterogeneity. A short-term increase in adalimumab dose did not drive better responses for induction, and apparent ER relationships were better explained by patient-inherent lower clearance. Conversely, during maintenance up to week 52, increasing the concentration via dose translated to better responses more robustly. The ER findings for SERENE UC were consistent with SERENE CD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信