SERENE ER 分析第 1 部分--SERENE CD:中度至重度活动性克罗恩病患者阿达木单抗高剂量与标准剂量方案的暴露-反应分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mong-Jen Chen, Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla, Sven Stodtmann, Alexandra P. Song, Tricia K. Finney-Hayward, Nael M. Mostafa
{"title":"SERENE ER 分析第 1 部分--SERENE CD:中度至重度活动性克罗恩病患者阿达木单抗高剂量与标准剂量方案的暴露-反应分析。","authors":"Mong-Jen Chen,&nbsp;Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla,&nbsp;Sven Stodtmann,&nbsp;Alexandra P. Song,&nbsp;Tricia K. Finney-Hayward,&nbsp;Nael M. Mostafa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>SERENE CD (NCT02065570) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction dose would improve patients with Crohn disease response and suggested a flat dose-response relationship for efficacy in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients’ baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Efficacy end points (clinical remission/endoscopic response) at Weeks 4, 12, and 56 were evaluated in exposure-response analyses using multivariable logistic regression. Analyses showed an increasing trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens, which suggested that average concentration has an impact on coprimary efficacy end points within each group, but data did not fit a single-response curve. Although higher concentrations within arms were associated with improved outcomes, increasing the concentration through a higher induction dose was not associated with increasing clinical remission/endoscopic response at Week 4/12. A model including inverse effective clearance eliminated heterogeneity and described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. In the maintenance study, the response rates at Week 56 showed no heterogeneity. In the induction study, patients with lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better, whereas in the maintenance study average concentration drove primary efficacy end points at Week 56. Research extending these findings to other indications is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"13 9","pages":"1024-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SERENE ER Analysis Part 1-SERENE CD: Exposure-Response Analysis of Higher Versus Standard Adalimumab Dosing Regimens for Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn Disease\",\"authors\":\"Mong-Jen Chen,&nbsp;Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla,&nbsp;Sven Stodtmann,&nbsp;Alexandra P. Song,&nbsp;Tricia K. Finney-Hayward,&nbsp;Nael M. Mostafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>SERENE CD (NCT02065570) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction dose would improve patients with Crohn disease response and suggested a flat dose-response relationship for efficacy in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients’ baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Efficacy end points (clinical remission/endoscopic response) at Weeks 4, 12, and 56 were evaluated in exposure-response analyses using multivariable logistic regression. Analyses showed an increasing trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens, which suggested that average concentration has an impact on coprimary efficacy end points within each group, but data did not fit a single-response curve. Although higher concentrations within arms were associated with improved outcomes, increasing the concentration through a higher induction dose was not associated with increasing clinical remission/endoscopic response at Week 4/12. A model including inverse effective clearance eliminated heterogeneity and described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. In the maintenance study, the response rates at Week 56 showed no heterogeneity. In the induction study, patients with lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better, whereas in the maintenance study average concentration drove primary efficacy end points at Week 56. Research extending these findings to other indications is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"1024-1032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1438\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SERENE CD(NCT02065570)评估了较高的阿达木单抗诱导剂量是否能改善克罗恩病患者的反应,结果表明诱导研究中的疗效呈平坦的剂量-反应关系。考虑到患者的基线特征,我们调查了诱导和维持研究中的暴露-反应关系。我们使用已建立的群体药代动力学模型模拟了阿达木单抗的暴露量。使用多变量逻辑回归对第4、12和56周的疗效终点(临床缓解/内镜反应)进行暴露-反应分析评估。分析表明,诱导方案之间的异质性呈上升趋势,这表明平均浓度对各组的主要疗效终点有影响,但数据并不符合单反应曲线。虽然各组内较高的浓度与疗效改善有关,但通过提高诱导剂量来增加浓度与第4/12周临床缓解/内镜反应的增加无关。一个包括逆有效清除率的模型消除了异质性,并用一条曲线描述了不同诱导方案的趋势。在维持治疗研究中,第 56 周的应答率没有显示出异质性。在诱导研究中,阿达木单抗有效清除率较低的患者反应较好,而在维持治疗研究中,平均浓度对第56周的主要疗效终点有推动作用。需要将这些研究结果推广到其他适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SERENE ER Analysis Part 1-SERENE CD: Exposure-Response Analysis of Higher Versus Standard Adalimumab Dosing Regimens for Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn Disease

SERENE CD (NCT02065570) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction dose would improve patients with Crohn disease response and suggested a flat dose-response relationship for efficacy in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients’ baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Efficacy end points (clinical remission/endoscopic response) at Weeks 4, 12, and 56 were evaluated in exposure-response analyses using multivariable logistic regression. Analyses showed an increasing trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens, which suggested that average concentration has an impact on coprimary efficacy end points within each group, but data did not fit a single-response curve. Although higher concentrations within arms were associated with improved outcomes, increasing the concentration through a higher induction dose was not associated with increasing clinical remission/endoscopic response at Week 4/12. A model including inverse effective clearance eliminated heterogeneity and described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. In the maintenance study, the response rates at Week 56 showed no heterogeneity. In the induction study, patients with lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better, whereas in the maintenance study average concentration drove primary efficacy end points at Week 56. Research extending these findings to other indications is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信