经济计算的 "手段 "与 "目的"：一场划时代争端的缺失

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1111/ecaf.12640

Dmitrii Trubnikov

{"title":"经济计算的 \"手段 \"与 \"目的\"：一场划时代争端的缺失","authors":"Dmitrii Trubnikov","doi":"10.1111/ecaf.12640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current technological advances have revived the old socialist calculation debate. While the arguments on the socialist side appear to be backed by exciting technological developments, the pro-market camp still mainly relies on the classical thinking of the Austrian school. A reasonable way to reinvigorate the free-market thesis is to look at the ends of economic calculations, intentionally overlooked during the classical period of the debate. A valuable supplement to the contemporary pro-market position could be found in the ordoliberal vision that emphasised the interdependence of various spheres and the power problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":44825,"journal":{"name":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","volume":"44 2","pages":"281-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘means’ and the ‘ends’ of economic calculation: The missing aspect of an epochal dispute\",\"authors\":\"Dmitrii Trubnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecaf.12640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Current technological advances have revived the old socialist calculation debate. While the arguments on the socialist side appear to be backed by exciting technological developments, the pro-market camp still mainly relies on the classical thinking of the Austrian school. A reasonable way to reinvigorate the free-market thesis is to look at the ends of economic calculations, intentionally overlooked during the classical period of the debate. A valuable supplement to the contemporary pro-market position could be found in the ordoliberal vision that emphasised the interdependence of various spheres and the power problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"281-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecaf.12640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecaf.12640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的技术进步重新引发了旧的社会主义计算辩论。虽然社会主义一方的论点似乎得到了令人振奋的技术发展的支持，但支持市场的阵营仍然主要依赖奥地利学派的经典思想。重振自由市场论点的一个合理途径是审视经济计算的两端，这在经典辩论时期被有意忽略了。强调各领域相互依存和权力问题的秩序自由主义观点可以为当代支持市场的立场提供有价值的补充。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The ‘means’ and the ‘ends’ of economic calculation: The missing aspect of an epochal dispute

Current technological advances have revived the old socialist calculation debate. While the arguments on the socialist side appear to be backed by exciting technological developments, the pro-market camp still mainly relies on the classical thinking of the Austrian school. A reasonable way to reinvigorate the free-market thesis is to look at the ends of economic calculations, intentionally overlooked during the classical period of the debate. A valuable supplement to the contemporary pro-market position could be found in the ordoliberal vision that emphasised the interdependence of various spheres and the power problem.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Economic Affairs is a journal for those interested in the application of economic principles to practical affairs. It aims to stimulate debate on economic and social problems by asking its authors, while analysing complex issues, to make their analysis and conclusions accessible to a wide audience. Each issue has a theme on which the main articles focus, providing a succinct and up-to-date review of a particular field of applied economics. Themes in 2008 included: New Perspectives on the Economics and Politics of Ageing, Housing for the Poor: the Role of Government, The Economic Analysis of Institutions, and Healthcare: State Failure. Academics are also invited to submit additional articles on subjects related to the coverage of the journal. There is section of double blind refereed articles and a section for shorter pieces that are reviewed by our Editorial Board (Economic Viewpoints). Please contact the editor for full submission details for both sections.