化学和化学工程领域负责任的研究与创新及高等教育

IF 3 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Tom Børsen , Jan Mehlich
{"title":"化学和化学工程领域负责任的研究与创新及高等教育","authors":"Tom Børsen ,&nbsp;Jan Mehlich","doi":"10.1016/j.dche.2024.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the relationship between Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and chemistry / chemical engineering education at university level. It does so by describing the genealogy of the RRI concept as well as outlining three different interpretations of what RRI refers to and combining them into the <em>hexagon model of RRI</em>. This model constitutes the theoretical framework for this work. The second part of the paper addresses how the science and engineering education research literature has embraced insights from RRI. The hexagon model of RRI explicitly includes a dimension on (science and engineering) education, and this paper will contribute to this dimension by investigating and discussing how research literature can link RRI and tertiary chemistry and chemical engineering education. The paper shows that very limited work has been done to liaise chemistry higher education and chemical engineering education with the RRI framework. In the concluding section of the paper, we discuss how the reported educational experiences on RRI in STEM can be translated into higher education in chemical engineering and chemistry. Hereby a proposal to fill the identified knowledge gap is made. The core of the paper is conceptual, and its central purpose is to introduce RRI to a chemical engineering and chemistry ethics education audience. As mentioned, the RRI approach has gone largely unnoticed within engineering ethics education, and only received limited attention within ethics of chemistry education. We hope that these research communities will find it inspirational to get involved in the RRI framework and to actively enact RRI insights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72815,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chemical Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000310/pdfft?md5=6fcc0c11064294d5d2c5120ba3fc1b39&pid=1-s2.0-S2772508124000310-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsible research and innovation and tertiary education in chemistry and chemical engineering\",\"authors\":\"Tom Børsen ,&nbsp;Jan Mehlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dche.2024.100169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates the relationship between Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and chemistry / chemical engineering education at university level. It does so by describing the genealogy of the RRI concept as well as outlining three different interpretations of what RRI refers to and combining them into the <em>hexagon model of RRI</em>. This model constitutes the theoretical framework for this work. The second part of the paper addresses how the science and engineering education research literature has embraced insights from RRI. The hexagon model of RRI explicitly includes a dimension on (science and engineering) education, and this paper will contribute to this dimension by investigating and discussing how research literature can link RRI and tertiary chemistry and chemical engineering education. The paper shows that very limited work has been done to liaise chemistry higher education and chemical engineering education with the RRI framework. In the concluding section of the paper, we discuss how the reported educational experiences on RRI in STEM can be translated into higher education in chemical engineering and chemistry. Hereby a proposal to fill the identified knowledge gap is made. The core of the paper is conceptual, and its central purpose is to introduce RRI to a chemical engineering and chemistry ethics education audience. As mentioned, the RRI approach has gone largely unnoticed within engineering ethics education, and only received limited attention within ethics of chemistry education. We hope that these research communities will find it inspirational to get involved in the RRI framework and to actively enact RRI insights.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000310/pdfft?md5=6fcc0c11064294d5d2c5120ba3fc1b39&pid=1-s2.0-S2772508124000310-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了负责任的研究与创新(RRI)与大学化学/化学工程教育之间的关系。本文介绍了负责任的研究与创新(Responsible Research and Innovation,RRI)概念的发展历程,概述了对 RRI 内涵的三种不同解释,并将它们组合成 RRI 的六边形模型。该模型构成了本文的理论框架。论文的第二部分论述了科学与工程教育研究文献是如何接受 RRI 见解的。RRI 的六边形模型明确包括(科学和工程)教育维度,本文将通过研究和讨论研究文献如何将 RRI 与高等化学和化学工程教育联系起来,为这一维度做出贡献。本文表明,将高等化学教育和化学工程教育与 RRI 框架联系起来的工作非常有限。在本文的结论部分,我们讨论了如何将 STEM 中报告的 RRI 教育经验转化为化学工程和化学高等教育。在此,我们提出了一项填补所发现的知识空白的建议。本文的核心是概念性的,其中心目的是向化学工程和化学伦理教育受众介绍 RRI。如前所述,RRI 方法在工程伦理学教育中基本上没有引起注意,在化学伦理学教育中也只 得到有限的关注。我们希望这些研究团体能从中得到启发,参与到 RRI 框架中来,并积极采纳 RRI 的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsible research and innovation and tertiary education in chemistry and chemical engineering

This paper investigates the relationship between Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and chemistry / chemical engineering education at university level. It does so by describing the genealogy of the RRI concept as well as outlining three different interpretations of what RRI refers to and combining them into the hexagon model of RRI. This model constitutes the theoretical framework for this work. The second part of the paper addresses how the science and engineering education research literature has embraced insights from RRI. The hexagon model of RRI explicitly includes a dimension on (science and engineering) education, and this paper will contribute to this dimension by investigating and discussing how research literature can link RRI and tertiary chemistry and chemical engineering education. The paper shows that very limited work has been done to liaise chemistry higher education and chemical engineering education with the RRI framework. In the concluding section of the paper, we discuss how the reported educational experiences on RRI in STEM can be translated into higher education in chemical engineering and chemistry. Hereby a proposal to fill the identified knowledge gap is made. The core of the paper is conceptual, and its central purpose is to introduce RRI to a chemical engineering and chemistry ethics education audience. As mentioned, the RRI approach has gone largely unnoticed within engineering ethics education, and only received limited attention within ethics of chemistry education. We hope that these research communities will find it inspirational to get involved in the RRI framework and to actively enact RRI insights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信