在制造业中采用无人机和无人机互联网系统--障碍探讨

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Dauren Askerbekov , Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes , Ranjit Roy Ghatak , Rohit Joshi , Jayakrishna Kandasamy , Daniel Luiz de Mattos Nascimento
{"title":"在制造业中采用无人机和无人机互联网系统--障碍探讨","authors":"Dauren Askerbekov ,&nbsp;Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes ,&nbsp;Ranjit Roy Ghatak ,&nbsp;Rohit Joshi ,&nbsp;Jayakrishna Kandasamy ,&nbsp;Daniel Luiz de Mattos Nascimento","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The manufacturing sector attributes the growing prominence of Drones and the Internet of Drones (IoD) systems to their multifaceted utility in delivery, process monitoring, infrastructure inspection, inventory management, predictive maintenance, and safety inspections. Despite their potential benefits, adopting these technologies faces significant obstacles that need systematic identification and resolution. The current literature inadequately addresses the barriers impeding the adoption of Drones and IoD systems in manufacturing, indicating a research gap. This study bridges this gap by providing comprehensive insights and facilitating the organisational transition towards embracing Drone and IoD technologies. This research identifies 20 critical barriers to deploying Drones and IoD in manufacturing. These barriers are validated through a global quantitative survey of 120 Drone experts and analyzed via Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). EFA categorises these challenges into six distinct dimensions. Utilizing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), these dimensions and individual barriers are ranked, incorporating feedback from five Drone specialists. The study highlights ‘Safety and Human Resource Barriers’ and ‘Payload Capacity and Battery Barriers’ as the most predominant obstacles. Key concerns include limited battery life, explosion risks, and potential damage to assets and individuals. This research significantly advances the existing literature by presenting a practical methodology for categorising and prioritising Drone and IoD adoption barriers. Employing EFA and AHP offers a globally relevant framework for stakeholders to strategically address these challenges, advancing the integration of drones and IoD systems in the manufacturing domain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001969/pdfft?md5=23aa4873ed22527cb092ef34df18f5b7&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X24001969-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing drones and the Internet of drones systems in manufacturing – An exploration of obstacles\",\"authors\":\"Dauren Askerbekov ,&nbsp;Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes ,&nbsp;Ranjit Roy Ghatak ,&nbsp;Rohit Joshi ,&nbsp;Jayakrishna Kandasamy ,&nbsp;Daniel Luiz de Mattos Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The manufacturing sector attributes the growing prominence of Drones and the Internet of Drones (IoD) systems to their multifaceted utility in delivery, process monitoring, infrastructure inspection, inventory management, predictive maintenance, and safety inspections. Despite their potential benefits, adopting these technologies faces significant obstacles that need systematic identification and resolution. The current literature inadequately addresses the barriers impeding the adoption of Drones and IoD systems in manufacturing, indicating a research gap. This study bridges this gap by providing comprehensive insights and facilitating the organisational transition towards embracing Drone and IoD technologies. This research identifies 20 critical barriers to deploying Drones and IoD in manufacturing. These barriers are validated through a global quantitative survey of 120 Drone experts and analyzed via Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). EFA categorises these challenges into six distinct dimensions. Utilizing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), these dimensions and individual barriers are ranked, incorporating feedback from five Drone specialists. The study highlights ‘Safety and Human Resource Barriers’ and ‘Payload Capacity and Battery Barriers’ as the most predominant obstacles. Key concerns include limited battery life, explosion risks, and potential damage to assets and individuals. This research significantly advances the existing literature by presenting a practical methodology for categorising and prioritising Drone and IoD adoption barriers. Employing EFA and AHP offers a globally relevant framework for stakeholders to strategically address these challenges, advancing the integration of drones and IoD systems in the manufacturing domain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001969/pdfft?md5=23aa4873ed22527cb092ef34df18f5b7&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X24001969-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001969\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001969","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制造业之所以越来越重视无人机和无人机互联网(IoD)系统,是因为它们在交付、流程监控、基础设施检查、库存管理、预测性维护和安全检查方面具有多方面的用途。尽管这些技术具有潜在的优势,但采用这些技术也面临着巨大的障碍,需要系统地识别和解决。目前的文献没有充分探讨阻碍制造业采用无人机和物联网发展系统的障碍,这表明存在研究空白。本研究弥补了这一空白,提供了全面的见解,促进组织向采用无人机和物联网技术过渡。本研究确定了在制造业部署无人机和物联网的 20 个关键障碍。通过对 120 名无人机专家进行全球定量调查,对这些障碍进行了验证,并通过探索性因子分析(EFA)对其进行了分析。EFA 将这些挑战分为六个不同的维度。利用层次分析法(AHP),结合五位无人机专家的反馈意见,对这些维度和各个障碍进行了排序。研究强调,"安全和人力资源障碍 "以及 "有效载荷能力和电池障碍 "是最主要的障碍。关键问题包括电池寿命有限、爆炸风险以及对资产和个人的潜在损害。这项研究提出了一种实用的方法,用于对无人机和 IoD 的采用障碍进行分类和优先排序,极大地推动了现有文献的发展。采用 EFA 和 AHP 为利益相关者提供了一个具有全球意义的框架,以战略性地应对这些挑战,推动无人机和 IoD 系统在制造领域的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Embracing drones and the Internet of drones systems in manufacturing – An exploration of obstacles

The manufacturing sector attributes the growing prominence of Drones and the Internet of Drones (IoD) systems to their multifaceted utility in delivery, process monitoring, infrastructure inspection, inventory management, predictive maintenance, and safety inspections. Despite their potential benefits, adopting these technologies faces significant obstacles that need systematic identification and resolution. The current literature inadequately addresses the barriers impeding the adoption of Drones and IoD systems in manufacturing, indicating a research gap. This study bridges this gap by providing comprehensive insights and facilitating the organisational transition towards embracing Drone and IoD technologies. This research identifies 20 critical barriers to deploying Drones and IoD in manufacturing. These barriers are validated through a global quantitative survey of 120 Drone experts and analyzed via Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). EFA categorises these challenges into six distinct dimensions. Utilizing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), these dimensions and individual barriers are ranked, incorporating feedback from five Drone specialists. The study highlights ‘Safety and Human Resource Barriers’ and ‘Payload Capacity and Battery Barriers’ as the most predominant obstacles. Key concerns include limited battery life, explosion risks, and potential damage to assets and individuals. This research significantly advances the existing literature by presenting a practical methodology for categorising and prioritising Drone and IoD adoption barriers. Employing EFA and AHP offers a globally relevant framework for stakeholders to strategically address these challenges, advancing the integration of drones and IoD systems in the manufacturing domain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信