Valeria Henriquez , Jose A. Calvo-Manzano , Ana M. Moreno , Tomas San Feliu
{"title":"将 CMMI V2.0 与组合 SAFe 5.0 相结合的敏捷管理实践","authors":"Valeria Henriquez , Jose A. Calvo-Manzano , Ana M. Moreno , Tomas San Feliu","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agile is now a mainstream approach used by developer teams at software organizations. However, many of these organizations still employ traditional governance methods, negatively impacting agile team performance, quality and morale. To address this issue, we applied the Design Science Research Framework to develop Agile governance guidelines by harmonizing CMMI V2.0 and SAFe 5.0. Specifically, we matched CMMI V2.0 governance practices to SAFe 5.0 roles, practices and artefacts. The resulting guidelines were validated, first by means of a survey and then through interviews with process improvement practitioners and agile experts who worked on a fictitious case study. The survey participants, especially those more familiar with SAFe practices, stated that the proposed harmonization was meaningful. Agile experts participating in the case study confirmed that the proposed guidelines were practical and comprehensive, as well as consistent and complete. Pending further empirical validation, these guidelines constitute a crucial step towards Agile governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 103881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agile governance practices by aligning CMMI V2.0 with portfolio SAFe 5.0\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Henriquez , Jose A. Calvo-Manzano , Ana M. Moreno , Tomas San Feliu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Agile is now a mainstream approach used by developer teams at software organizations. However, many of these organizations still employ traditional governance methods, negatively impacting agile team performance, quality and morale. To address this issue, we applied the Design Science Research Framework to develop Agile governance guidelines by harmonizing CMMI V2.0 and SAFe 5.0. Specifically, we matched CMMI V2.0 governance practices to SAFe 5.0 roles, practices and artefacts. The resulting guidelines were validated, first by means of a survey and then through interviews with process improvement practitioners and agile experts who worked on a fictitious case study. The survey participants, especially those more familiar with SAFe practices, stated that the proposed harmonization was meaningful. Agile experts participating in the case study confirmed that the proposed guidelines were practical and comprehensive, as well as consistent and complete. Pending further empirical validation, these guidelines constitute a crucial step towards Agile governance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Standards & Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Standards & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000503\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agile governance practices by aligning CMMI V2.0 with portfolio SAFe 5.0
Agile is now a mainstream approach used by developer teams at software organizations. However, many of these organizations still employ traditional governance methods, negatively impacting agile team performance, quality and morale. To address this issue, we applied the Design Science Research Framework to develop Agile governance guidelines by harmonizing CMMI V2.0 and SAFe 5.0. Specifically, we matched CMMI V2.0 governance practices to SAFe 5.0 roles, practices and artefacts. The resulting guidelines were validated, first by means of a survey and then through interviews with process improvement practitioners and agile experts who worked on a fictitious case study. The survey participants, especially those more familiar with SAFe practices, stated that the proposed harmonization was meaningful. Agile experts participating in the case study confirmed that the proposed guidelines were practical and comprehensive, as well as consistent and complete. Pending further empirical validation, these guidelines constitute a crucial step towards Agile governance.
期刊介绍:
The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking.
Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics.
The journal
• Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels
• Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities
• Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods
• Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts
• Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.