基于脑电图技术的自然声音对人类压力恢复的影响

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Chao Liu , Xiaotong Jing , Jing Shi , Jiaxin Li , Yuanyuan Zhang , Weijun Gao
{"title":"基于脑电图技术的自然声音对人类压力恢复的影响","authors":"Chao Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Jing ,&nbsp;Jing Shi ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Li ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Weijun Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural sounds are an essential part of a restorative environment. Although numerous studies have established the positive impact of natural sounds on human health and well-being, few have examined the differences between natural sounds on human stress recovery. This study examined the impact of natural sounds on stress recovery by comparing a silent environment (control group) with three experimental groups exposed to flowing water sound, birdsong, and wind sounds. The investigation entailed the assessment of subjective assessments and EEG signals from 30 subjects (12 males and 18 females). The subjective evaluations indicated that the PRS scores for the sounds of flowing water and birdsong were superior to those of the silent environment. The EEG results revealed that EEG-α activity was more pronounced in response to natural sounds than the silent environment, with birdsong evoking the most significant EEG-α activity. Wind sounds increased the mental stress of the subjects. Conversely, birdsong and flowing water sound were beneficial for alleviating mental stress. Additionally, the analysis of event-related potentials (ERP) demonstrated that natural sounds elicited higher P300 amplitudes in central and parietal lobe sensors and had little effect on the frontal region. The study also demonstrated the correlation between EEG and subjective stress evaluations, providing insights into stress reduction theories and offering practical suggestions for optimizing the acoustic environment in urban settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102365"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of natural sound on human stress recovery based on EEG techniques\",\"authors\":\"Chao Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Jing ,&nbsp;Jing Shi ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Li ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Weijun Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Natural sounds are an essential part of a restorative environment. Although numerous studies have established the positive impact of natural sounds on human health and well-being, few have examined the differences between natural sounds on human stress recovery. This study examined the impact of natural sounds on stress recovery by comparing a silent environment (control group) with three experimental groups exposed to flowing water sound, birdsong, and wind sounds. The investigation entailed the assessment of subjective assessments and EEG signals from 30 subjects (12 males and 18 females). The subjective evaluations indicated that the PRS scores for the sounds of flowing water and birdsong were superior to those of the silent environment. The EEG results revealed that EEG-α activity was more pronounced in response to natural sounds than the silent environment, with birdsong evoking the most significant EEG-α activity. Wind sounds increased the mental stress of the subjects. Conversely, birdsong and flowing water sound were beneficial for alleviating mental stress. Additionally, the analysis of event-related potentials (ERP) demonstrated that natural sounds elicited higher P300 amplitudes in central and parietal lobe sensors and had little effect on the frontal region. The study also demonstrated the correlation between EEG and subjective stress evaluations, providing insights into stress reduction theories and offering practical suggestions for optimizing the acoustic environment in urban settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001385\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然声音是恢复性环境的重要组成部分。尽管许多研究都证实了自然声音对人类健康和幸福的积极影响,但很少有人研究自然声音对人类压力恢复的不同影响。本研究通过比较无声环境(对照组)和暴露于流水声、鸟鸣声和风声的三个实验组,考察了自然声音对压力恢复的影响。调查对 30 名受试者(12 名男性和 18 名女性)的主观评价和脑电图信号进行了评估。主观评估结果表明,流水声和鸟鸣声的 PRS 分数优于无声环境中的 PRS 分数。脑电图结果显示,自然声音比无声环境下的脑电图-α活动更明显,其中鸟鸣声引起的脑电图-α活动最为显著。风声会增加受试者的精神压力。相反,鸟鸣声和流水声则有利于缓解精神压力。此外,对事件相关电位(ERP)的分析表明,自然声音在中央和顶叶传感器中引起较高的 P300 振幅,而对额叶区域影响很小。研究还证明了脑电图与主观压力评估之间的相关性,为减压理论提供了启示,并为优化城市声学环境提供了实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of natural sound on human stress recovery based on EEG techniques

Natural sounds are an essential part of a restorative environment. Although numerous studies have established the positive impact of natural sounds on human health and well-being, few have examined the differences between natural sounds on human stress recovery. This study examined the impact of natural sounds on stress recovery by comparing a silent environment (control group) with three experimental groups exposed to flowing water sound, birdsong, and wind sounds. The investigation entailed the assessment of subjective assessments and EEG signals from 30 subjects (12 males and 18 females). The subjective evaluations indicated that the PRS scores for the sounds of flowing water and birdsong were superior to those of the silent environment. The EEG results revealed that EEG-α activity was more pronounced in response to natural sounds than the silent environment, with birdsong evoking the most significant EEG-α activity. Wind sounds increased the mental stress of the subjects. Conversely, birdsong and flowing water sound were beneficial for alleviating mental stress. Additionally, the analysis of event-related potentials (ERP) demonstrated that natural sounds elicited higher P300 amplitudes in central and parietal lobe sensors and had little effect on the frontal region. The study also demonstrated the correlation between EEG and subjective stress evaluations, providing insights into stress reduction theories and offering practical suggestions for optimizing the acoustic environment in urban settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信