探索移动即服务在早晨通勤出行中的作用

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Manlian Pan , Xiaotong Sun
{"title":"探索移动即服务在早晨通勤出行中的作用","authors":"Manlian Pan ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2024.103017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Promising the seamless integration of multiple transportation modes, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has gained popularity over the years, yet its effectiveness in enticing private car users and improving travel efficiency remains uncertain. This study explores the competitiveness of MaaS-enabled multi-modal travel options versus private car usage through equilibrium analysis. In addition to pricing that affects the fixed cost for travel, we examine the often overlooked inconvenience cost associated with multi-modal trips. We establish our analysis for the commuting problem of a one-origin-one-destination network, where a highway and a mass transit line connect the residential area and the central business district (CBD) area. Travelers choose their departure time and travel mode among auto, Park-and-Ride (PnR), ride-hailing and transit (RnT) to minimize their total travel cost. Inconvenience costs associated with searching for parking and waiting for ride-hailing are explicitly modeled. We analytically provide the mode share and departure time windows under all possible equilibria. Our findings reveal the complex nature of mode choice, distinctly affected by fixed and inconvenience costs, with demand playing an even more significant role. Notably, fixed costs set an entry fee to adopt different modes, and the feature of inconvenience costs affects the utilization of available transportation resources. More importantly, to benefit the overall system, we encourage maintaining a balanced mode share by implementing pricing and capacity strategies rather than aiming for a completer transition of private car users to MaaS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 103017"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the role of Mobility-as-a-Service in morning commuting trips\",\"authors\":\"Manlian Pan ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trb.2024.103017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Promising the seamless integration of multiple transportation modes, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has gained popularity over the years, yet its effectiveness in enticing private car users and improving travel efficiency remains uncertain. This study explores the competitiveness of MaaS-enabled multi-modal travel options versus private car usage through equilibrium analysis. In addition to pricing that affects the fixed cost for travel, we examine the often overlooked inconvenience cost associated with multi-modal trips. We establish our analysis for the commuting problem of a one-origin-one-destination network, where a highway and a mass transit line connect the residential area and the central business district (CBD) area. Travelers choose their departure time and travel mode among auto, Park-and-Ride (PnR), ride-hailing and transit (RnT) to minimize their total travel cost. Inconvenience costs associated with searching for parking and waiting for ride-hailing are explicitly modeled. We analytically provide the mode share and departure time windows under all possible equilibria. Our findings reveal the complex nature of mode choice, distinctly affected by fixed and inconvenience costs, with demand playing an even more significant role. Notably, fixed costs set an entry fee to adopt different modes, and the feature of inconvenience costs affects the utilization of available transportation resources. More importantly, to benefit the overall system, we encourage maintaining a balanced mode share by implementing pricing and capacity strategies rather than aiming for a completer transition of private car users to MaaS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001413\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移动即服务(MaaS)有望实现多种交通方式的无缝整合,多年来受到越来越多人的青睐,但其在吸引私家车用户和提高出行效率方面的效果仍不确定。本研究通过均衡分析,探讨了 MaaS 支持的多模式出行选择与私家车使用的竞争力。除了影响固定出行成本的定价外,我们还研究了经常被忽视的与多模式出行相关的不便成本。我们的分析针对的是 "一个出发地-一个目的地 "网络的通勤问题,在这个网络中,一条高速公路和一条公共交通线路将住宅区和中央商务区(CBD)连接起来。乘客在汽车、停车换乘(PnR)、打车和公交(RnT)中选择出发时间和出行方式,以最大限度地降低总出行成本。与寻找停车位和等待打车服务相关的不便成本被明确建模。我们通过分析提供了所有可能的均衡状态下的出行方式份额和出发时间窗口。我们的研究结果揭示了模式选择的复杂性,它明显受到固定成本和不便成本的影响,而需求则扮演着更为重要的角色。值得注意的是,固定成本设定了采用不同模式的入门费,而不便成本的特征则影响了可用交通资源的利用率。更重要的是,为了整个系统的利益,我们鼓励通过实施定价和容量策略来保持均衡的模式份额,而不是以私家车用户完全过渡到 MaaS 为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the role of Mobility-as-a-Service in morning commuting trips

Promising the seamless integration of multiple transportation modes, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has gained popularity over the years, yet its effectiveness in enticing private car users and improving travel efficiency remains uncertain. This study explores the competitiveness of MaaS-enabled multi-modal travel options versus private car usage through equilibrium analysis. In addition to pricing that affects the fixed cost for travel, we examine the often overlooked inconvenience cost associated with multi-modal trips. We establish our analysis for the commuting problem of a one-origin-one-destination network, where a highway and a mass transit line connect the residential area and the central business district (CBD) area. Travelers choose their departure time and travel mode among auto, Park-and-Ride (PnR), ride-hailing and transit (RnT) to minimize their total travel cost. Inconvenience costs associated with searching for parking and waiting for ride-hailing are explicitly modeled. We analytically provide the mode share and departure time windows under all possible equilibria. Our findings reveal the complex nature of mode choice, distinctly affected by fixed and inconvenience costs, with demand playing an even more significant role. Notably, fixed costs set an entry fee to adopt different modes, and the feature of inconvenience costs affects the utilization of available transportation resources. More importantly, to benefit the overall system, we encourage maintaining a balanced mode share by implementing pricing and capacity strategies rather than aiming for a completer transition of private car users to MaaS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
143
审稿时长
14.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信