Micah Davison , Timothy Copeland , Dennis Scarnecchia
{"title":"千古难题:通过质量管理获得可靠的鱼龄信息","authors":"Micah Davison , Timothy Copeland , Dennis Scarnecchia","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Age information is central to assessment and management of fish populations. Age information must be reliable to have value, which depends on its quality. Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) are processes often applied to some aspects of producing age information (e.g., annulus validation). However, we advocate for a more holistic approach which leverages QA/QC measures across all phases of the age information-generating process. Systematic implementation of QA/QC measures in a repetitive process is common in the manufacturing industry where it is known as a quality management system (QMS) but this framework is not well described in the fisheries literature. We designed and implemented a QMS that incorporates QA/QC measures across all phases of fish age information development: Collection, Interpretation, and Distribution. These measures are guided by six principles: Train, Simplify, Validate, Compare, Record, and Improve. In our QMS, the Train, Simplify, and Validate principles are largely guidance for QA measures, while Compare, Record, and Improve guide QC measures. We provide examples of common errors (or sources of error) in each phase, and how the guiding principles in our QMS address these errors. This is a QMS crafted as a holistic approach to managing the quality of fish age information; however, it has broad application as a conceptual framework for other repetitive processes in fisheries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A problem for the ages: Achieving reliable fish age information through quality management\",\"authors\":\"Micah Davison , Timothy Copeland , Dennis Scarnecchia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Age information is central to assessment and management of fish populations. Age information must be reliable to have value, which depends on its quality. Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) are processes often applied to some aspects of producing age information (e.g., annulus validation). However, we advocate for a more holistic approach which leverages QA/QC measures across all phases of the age information-generating process. Systematic implementation of QA/QC measures in a repetitive process is common in the manufacturing industry where it is known as a quality management system (QMS) but this framework is not well described in the fisheries literature. We designed and implemented a QMS that incorporates QA/QC measures across all phases of fish age information development: Collection, Interpretation, and Distribution. These measures are guided by six principles: Train, Simplify, Validate, Compare, Record, and Improve. In our QMS, the Train, Simplify, and Validate principles are largely guidance for QA measures, while Compare, Record, and Improve guide QC measures. We provide examples of common errors (or sources of error) in each phase, and how the guiding principles in our QMS address these errors. This is a QMS crafted as a holistic approach to managing the quality of fish age information; however, it has broad application as a conceptual framework for other repetitive processes in fisheries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624001656\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624001656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A problem for the ages: Achieving reliable fish age information through quality management
Age information is central to assessment and management of fish populations. Age information must be reliable to have value, which depends on its quality. Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) are processes often applied to some aspects of producing age information (e.g., annulus validation). However, we advocate for a more holistic approach which leverages QA/QC measures across all phases of the age information-generating process. Systematic implementation of QA/QC measures in a repetitive process is common in the manufacturing industry where it is known as a quality management system (QMS) but this framework is not well described in the fisheries literature. We designed and implemented a QMS that incorporates QA/QC measures across all phases of fish age information development: Collection, Interpretation, and Distribution. These measures are guided by six principles: Train, Simplify, Validate, Compare, Record, and Improve. In our QMS, the Train, Simplify, and Validate principles are largely guidance for QA measures, while Compare, Record, and Improve guide QC measures. We provide examples of common errors (or sources of error) in each phase, and how the guiding principles in our QMS address these errors. This is a QMS crafted as a holistic approach to managing the quality of fish age information; however, it has broad application as a conceptual framework for other repetitive processes in fisheries.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.