前列腺切除术后低分次挽救性放疗的靶点覆盖率和危险器官剂量

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Floor H.E. Staal, Jorinde Janssen, Sajee Krishnapillai, Johannes A. Langendijk, Stefan Both, Charlotte L. Brouwer, Shafak Aluwini
{"title":"前列腺切除术后低分次挽救性放疗的靶点覆盖率和危险器官剂量","authors":"Floor H.E. Staal,&nbsp;Jorinde Janssen,&nbsp;Sajee Krishnapillai,&nbsp;Johannes A. Langendijk,&nbsp;Stefan Both,&nbsp;Charlotte L. Brouwer,&nbsp;Shafak Aluwini","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Introducing moderately hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following prostatectomy obligates investigation of its effects on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. This study assessed interfractional volume and dose changes in OARs and CTV in moderately hypofractionated SRT and evaluated the 8-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty patients from the PERYTON-trial were included; 10 received conventional SRT (35 × 2 Gy) and 10 hypofractionated SRT (20 × 3 Gy). OARs were delineated on 539 pre-treatment Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scans to compare interfractional OAR volume changes. CTVs for the hypofractionated group were delineated on 199 CBCTs. Dose distributions with 4 and 6 mm PTV margins were generated using voxel-wise minimum robustness evaluation of the original 8-mm PTV plan, and dose changes were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median volume changes for bladder and rectum were −26 % and −10 %, respectively. OAR volume changes were not significantly different between the two treatment schedules. The 8-mm PTV margin ensured optimal coverage for prostate bed and vesicle bed CTV (V95 = 100 % in &gt;97 % fractions). However, bladder V60 &lt;25 % was not achieved in 5 % of fractions, and rectum V60 &lt;5 % was unmet in 33 % of fractions. A 6-mm PTV margin resulted in CTV V95 = 100 % in 92 % of fractions for prostate bed, and in 86 % for vesicle bed CTV.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Moderately hypofractionated SRT yielded comparable OAR volume changes to conventionally fractionated SRT. Interfractional changes remained acceptable with a PTV margin of 6 mm for prostate bed and 8 mm for vesicle bed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000708/pdfft?md5=132a0a691b8570ae9bf8ccaf6ecd72ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000708-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target coverage and organs at risk dose in hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Floor H.E. Staal,&nbsp;Jorinde Janssen,&nbsp;Sajee Krishnapillai,&nbsp;Johannes A. Langendijk,&nbsp;Stefan Both,&nbsp;Charlotte L. Brouwer,&nbsp;Shafak Aluwini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Introducing moderately hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following prostatectomy obligates investigation of its effects on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. This study assessed interfractional volume and dose changes in OARs and CTV in moderately hypofractionated SRT and evaluated the 8-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty patients from the PERYTON-trial were included; 10 received conventional SRT (35 × 2 Gy) and 10 hypofractionated SRT (20 × 3 Gy). OARs were delineated on 539 pre-treatment Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scans to compare interfractional OAR volume changes. CTVs for the hypofractionated group were delineated on 199 CBCTs. Dose distributions with 4 and 6 mm PTV margins were generated using voxel-wise minimum robustness evaluation of the original 8-mm PTV plan, and dose changes were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median volume changes for bladder and rectum were −26 % and −10 %, respectively. OAR volume changes were not significantly different between the two treatment schedules. The 8-mm PTV margin ensured optimal coverage for prostate bed and vesicle bed CTV (V95 = 100 % in &gt;97 % fractions). However, bladder V60 &lt;25 % was not achieved in 5 % of fractions, and rectum V60 &lt;5 % was unmet in 33 % of fractions. A 6-mm PTV margin resulted in CTV V95 = 100 % in 92 % of fractions for prostate bed, and in 86 % for vesicle bed CTV.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Moderately hypofractionated SRT yielded comparable OAR volume changes to conventionally fractionated SRT. Interfractional changes remained acceptable with a PTV margin of 6 mm for prostate bed and 8 mm for vesicle bed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000708/pdfft?md5=132a0a691b8570ae9bf8ccaf6ecd72ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000708-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的在前列腺切除术后采用适度低分次挽救性放疗(SRT)必须研究其对临床靶体积(CTV)覆盖率和危险器官(OAR)剂量的影响。本研究评估了适度低分次 SRT 中 OAR 和 CTV 的分区间体积和剂量变化,并评估了 8 毫米计划靶体积(PTV)边缘。材料和方法纳入了 PERYTON 试验的 20 例患者;其中 10 例接受了传统 SRT(35 × 2 Gy),10 例接受了低分次 SRT(20 × 3 Gy)。在 539 次治疗前锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描中划定了 OAR,以比较点阵间 OAR 体积的变化。在 199 张 CBCT 扫描图像上划定了低剂量组的 CTV。通过对原始 8 毫米 PTV 计划进行体素最小稳健性评估,生成了 4 毫米和 6 毫米 PTV 边缘的剂量分布,并对剂量变化进行了评估。两种治疗方案的OAR体积变化差异不大。8毫米的PTV边缘确保了前列腺床和膀胱床CTV的最佳覆盖率(V95=100%,97%分次)。然而,有 5% 的分次未达到膀胱 V60 <25%,33% 的分次未达到直肠 V60 <5%。6毫米的PTV边缘使92%的分次前列腺床CTV V95 = 100%,86%的分次膀胱床CTV V95 = 100%。前列腺床和膀胱床的 PTV 边界分别为 6 毫米和 8 毫米,分段间的变化仍然可以接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target coverage and organs at risk dose in hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy

Background and purpose

Introducing moderately hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following prostatectomy obligates investigation of its effects on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. This study assessed interfractional volume and dose changes in OARs and CTV in moderately hypofractionated SRT and evaluated the 8-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients from the PERYTON-trial were included; 10 received conventional SRT (35 × 2 Gy) and 10 hypofractionated SRT (20 × 3 Gy). OARs were delineated on 539 pre-treatment Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scans to compare interfractional OAR volume changes. CTVs for the hypofractionated group were delineated on 199 CBCTs. Dose distributions with 4 and 6 mm PTV margins were generated using voxel-wise minimum robustness evaluation of the original 8-mm PTV plan, and dose changes were assessed.

Results

Median volume changes for bladder and rectum were −26 % and −10 %, respectively. OAR volume changes were not significantly different between the two treatment schedules. The 8-mm PTV margin ensured optimal coverage for prostate bed and vesicle bed CTV (V95 = 100 % in >97 % fractions). However, bladder V60 <25 % was not achieved in 5 % of fractions, and rectum V60 <5 % was unmet in 33 % of fractions. A 6-mm PTV margin resulted in CTV V95 = 100 % in 92 % of fractions for prostate bed, and in 86 % for vesicle bed CTV.

Conclusions

Moderately hypofractionated SRT yielded comparable OAR volume changes to conventionally fractionated SRT. Interfractional changes remained acceptable with a PTV margin of 6 mm for prostate bed and 8 mm for vesicle bed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信