不同缺血压力对卧推运动中横杆速度的影响:随机交叉试验

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Biology of Sport Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2024.133004
Dawid Gawel, Jakub Jarosz, Robert Trybulski, Michal Krzysztofik, Piotr Makar, João Guilherme Vieira, Grzegorz Trybek, Michal Wilk
{"title":"不同缺血压力对卧推运动中横杆速度的影响:随机交叉试验","authors":"Dawid Gawel, Jakub Jarosz, Robert Trybulski, Michal Krzysztofik, Piotr Makar, João Guilherme Vieira, Grzegorz Trybek, Michal Wilk","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2024.133004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different ischemic pressures applied during rest intervals on bar velocity during the bench press exercise. 10 resistance-trained males (age = 23.2 ± 2.7 years; body mass = 83.9 ± 9 kg; body height = 181 ± 5.2 cm; bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) = 125 ± 16.4 kg; training experience = 5.4 ± 3.4 years) participated in the study. During 4 experimental sessions, following a randomized crossover design, the subjects performed 5 sets of 3 repetitions of the bench press exercise with a load of 60% 1RM under conditions: with ischemia (50% or 80% of arterial occlusion pressure), with SHAM ischemia (20 mmHg) and without ischemia (control condition). For the ischemic conditions cuffs were applied before each set for 6.5 min and released 30 s before the start of the set as reperfusion (6.5 min ischemia + 0.5 min reperfusion). In the control condition, ischemia was not applied. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant condition × set interaction for mean bar velocity (MV; <i>p</i> = 0.17) and peak bar velocity (PV; <i>p</i> = 0.66). There was also no main effect of condition for MV (<i>p</i> = 0.58) and PV (<i>p</i> = 0.61). The results indicate that ischemic or SHAM treatment (6.5 minutes ischemia or SHAM + 30 s reperfusion) does not affect mean and peak bar velocity during the bench press exercise regardless of the applied pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":"41 3","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different ischemic pressures on bar velocity during the bench press exercise: A randomized crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dawid Gawel, Jakub Jarosz, Robert Trybulski, Michal Krzysztofik, Piotr Makar, João Guilherme Vieira, Grzegorz Trybek, Michal Wilk\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/biolsport.2024.133004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different ischemic pressures applied during rest intervals on bar velocity during the bench press exercise. 10 resistance-trained males (age = 23.2 ± 2.7 years; body mass = 83.9 ± 9 kg; body height = 181 ± 5.2 cm; bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) = 125 ± 16.4 kg; training experience = 5.4 ± 3.4 years) participated in the study. During 4 experimental sessions, following a randomized crossover design, the subjects performed 5 sets of 3 repetitions of the bench press exercise with a load of 60% 1RM under conditions: with ischemia (50% or 80% of arterial occlusion pressure), with SHAM ischemia (20 mmHg) and without ischemia (control condition). For the ischemic conditions cuffs were applied before each set for 6.5 min and released 30 s before the start of the set as reperfusion (6.5 min ischemia + 0.5 min reperfusion). In the control condition, ischemia was not applied. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant condition × set interaction for mean bar velocity (MV; <i>p</i> = 0.17) and peak bar velocity (PV; <i>p</i> = 0.66). There was also no main effect of condition for MV (<i>p</i> = 0.58) and PV (<i>p</i> = 0.61). The results indicate that ischemic or SHAM treatment (6.5 minutes ischemia or SHAM + 30 s reperfusion) does not affect mean and peak bar velocity during the bench press exercise regardless of the applied pressure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167470/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.133004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.133004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是评估在卧推运动中,在休息时间施加不同的缺血压力对杠铃速度的影响。10 名接受过阻力训练的男性(年龄 = 23.2 ± 2.7 岁;体重 = 83.9 ± 9 千克;身高 = 181 ± 5.2 厘米;卧推单次最大重量 (1RM) = 125 ± 16.4 千克;训练年限 = 5.4 ± 3.4 年)参加了研究。在随机交叉设计的 4 次实验中,受试者在缺血(50% 或 80% 的动脉闭塞压力)、SHAM 缺血(20 mmHg)和无缺血(对照组)条件下,以 60% 的 1RM 负荷进行了 5 组 3 次卧推练习。在缺血条件下,每组开始前使用袖带 6.5 分钟,并在每组开始前 30 秒释放袖带作为再灌注(6.5 分钟缺血 + 0.5 分钟再灌注)。对照组不进行缺血。双向重复测量方差分析显示,平均杠速度(MV;P = 0.17)和峰值杠速度(PV;P = 0.66)没有明显的条件 × 组交互作用。此外,MV(p = 0.58)和 PV(p = 0.61)也没有条件的主效应。结果表明,缺血或 SHAM 处理(6.5 分钟缺血或 SHAM + 30 秒再灌注)不会影响卧推运动中的平均杆速和峰值杆速,与施加的压力无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of different ischemic pressures on bar velocity during the bench press exercise: A randomized crossover trial.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different ischemic pressures applied during rest intervals on bar velocity during the bench press exercise. 10 resistance-trained males (age = 23.2 ± 2.7 years; body mass = 83.9 ± 9 kg; body height = 181 ± 5.2 cm; bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) = 125 ± 16.4 kg; training experience = 5.4 ± 3.4 years) participated in the study. During 4 experimental sessions, following a randomized crossover design, the subjects performed 5 sets of 3 repetitions of the bench press exercise with a load of 60% 1RM under conditions: with ischemia (50% or 80% of arterial occlusion pressure), with SHAM ischemia (20 mmHg) and without ischemia (control condition). For the ischemic conditions cuffs were applied before each set for 6.5 min and released 30 s before the start of the set as reperfusion (6.5 min ischemia + 0.5 min reperfusion). In the control condition, ischemia was not applied. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant condition × set interaction for mean bar velocity (MV; p = 0.17) and peak bar velocity (PV; p = 0.66). There was also no main effect of condition for MV (p = 0.58) and PV (p = 0.61). The results indicate that ischemic or SHAM treatment (6.5 minutes ischemia or SHAM + 30 s reperfusion) does not affect mean and peak bar velocity during the bench press exercise regardless of the applied pressure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sport
Biology of Sport 生物-运动科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984. Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信