{"title":"当 2024 年低收入补贴福利扩大时,医疗保险 D 部分低收入补贴受益人的可负担性和依从性收益。","authors":"Bruce C Stuart, F Ellen Loh, J Samantha Dougherty","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lowest-income beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program receive \"full subsidies\" that waive the premium and deductible and impose minimal copayments. Those with slightly higher incomes and assets may be eligible for \"partial subsidies.\" Prior to 2024, individuals receiving partial subsidies faced reduced Part D premiums and deductibles and paid 15% coinsurance. Under provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, recipients of partial subsidies were upgraded to full subsidies beginning in 2024. The objective of this pilot study was to assess whether the new policy is likely to reduce cost-related nonadherence to prescribed medications- a common problem faced by older adults even among those receiving subsidies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare cost-related nonadherence among partial- vs full-subsidy recipients with similar characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for the study. The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey is uniquely suited for this work because it contains administrative data on low-income subsidy enrollment plus extensive survey-based information on financial resources necessary to establish program eligibility and rates of cost-related nonadherence. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic characteristics, economic resources, work status, and health variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the partial-subsidy group reported significantly more cost-related nonadherence (39% vs 22%; <i>P</i> = 0.01) arising both from a lower propensity to fill some prescriptions (23% vs 12%; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and to more delays in filling others (29% vs 8%; <i>P</i> = 0.03). The differences were more pronounced for women and racial and ethnic minority groups in contrast to men and majority populations, respectively. Because the study samples were small, we could not conduct a detailed regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The magnitude of cost-related nonadherence effects associated with partial-subsidy cost sharing suggests that the Inflation Reduction Act policy to expand low-income subsidies may boost medication adherence, most notably among women and racial and ethnic minority groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"30 7","pages":"728-735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affordability and adherence gains for Medicare Part D low-income subsidy recipients when low-income subsidy benefits expanded in 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Bruce C Stuart, F Ellen Loh, J Samantha Dougherty\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lowest-income beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program receive \\\"full subsidies\\\" that waive the premium and deductible and impose minimal copayments. Those with slightly higher incomes and assets may be eligible for \\\"partial subsidies.\\\" Prior to 2024, individuals receiving partial subsidies faced reduced Part D premiums and deductibles and paid 15% coinsurance. Under provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, recipients of partial subsidies were upgraded to full subsidies beginning in 2024. The objective of this pilot study was to assess whether the new policy is likely to reduce cost-related nonadherence to prescribed medications- a common problem faced by older adults even among those receiving subsidies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare cost-related nonadherence among partial- vs full-subsidy recipients with similar characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for the study. The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey is uniquely suited for this work because it contains administrative data on low-income subsidy enrollment plus extensive survey-based information on financial resources necessary to establish program eligibility and rates of cost-related nonadherence. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic characteristics, economic resources, work status, and health variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the partial-subsidy group reported significantly more cost-related nonadherence (39% vs 22%; <i>P</i> = 0.01) arising both from a lower propensity to fill some prescriptions (23% vs 12%; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and to more delays in filling others (29% vs 8%; <i>P</i> = 0.03). The differences were more pronounced for women and racial and ethnic minority groups in contrast to men and majority populations, respectively. Because the study samples were small, we could not conduct a detailed regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The magnitude of cost-related nonadherence effects associated with partial-subsidy cost sharing suggests that the Inflation Reduction Act policy to expand low-income subsidies may boost medication adherence, most notably among women and racial and ethnic minority groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"30 7\",\"pages\":\"728-735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217861/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.728\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:加入联邦医疗保险 D 部分处方药计划的最低收入受益人可获得 "全额补贴",免除保费和自付额,并只需支付最低的共付额。收入和资产稍高的人可能有资格获得 "部分补贴"。在 2024 年之前,接受部分补贴的个人面临 D 部分保费和自付额降低的问题,并需支付 15%的共同保险费。根据《通货膨胀削减法》的规定,从 2024 年开始,部分补贴的领取者将升级为全额补贴。这项试点研究的目的是评估新政策是否有可能减少与费用相关的不遵医嘱服药现象--这是老年人面临的一个普遍问题,即使是那些接受补贴的老年人:比较具有相似特征的部分补贴与全额补贴接受者中与费用相关的不坚持服药情况:我们使用 2019 年医疗保险当前受益人调查数据进行研究。联邦医疗保险当前受益人调查 "非常适合这项工作,因为它包含了低收入补贴注册的管理数据,以及关于确定计划资格所需的财务资源和与费用相关的不坚持率的广泛调查信息。解释变量包括社会人口特征、经济资源、工作状况和健康变量:我们发现,部分补贴组报告的与费用相关的不依从率明显更高(39% vs 22%; P = 0.01),原因是他们开具处方的意愿更低(23% vs 12%; P = 0.03),开具其他处方的延迟率更高(29% vs 8%; P = 0.03)。与男性和多数人口相比,女性、少数种族和少数族裔群体的差异更为明显。由于研究样本较少,我们无法进行详细的回归分析:与部分补贴费用分担相关的与费用相关的非依从性影响的程度表明,《通货膨胀削减法案》扩大低收入补贴的政策可能会提高药物依从性,尤其是在女性、少数种族和少数民族群体中。
Affordability and adherence gains for Medicare Part D low-income subsidy recipients when low-income subsidy benefits expanded in 2024.
Background: The lowest-income beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program receive "full subsidies" that waive the premium and deductible and impose minimal copayments. Those with slightly higher incomes and assets may be eligible for "partial subsidies." Prior to 2024, individuals receiving partial subsidies faced reduced Part D premiums and deductibles and paid 15% coinsurance. Under provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, recipients of partial subsidies were upgraded to full subsidies beginning in 2024. The objective of this pilot study was to assess whether the new policy is likely to reduce cost-related nonadherence to prescribed medications- a common problem faced by older adults even among those receiving subsidies.
Objective: To compare cost-related nonadherence among partial- vs full-subsidy recipients with similar characteristics.
Methods: We used 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for the study. The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey is uniquely suited for this work because it contains administrative data on low-income subsidy enrollment plus extensive survey-based information on financial resources necessary to establish program eligibility and rates of cost-related nonadherence. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic characteristics, economic resources, work status, and health variables.
Results: We found that the partial-subsidy group reported significantly more cost-related nonadherence (39% vs 22%; P = 0.01) arising both from a lower propensity to fill some prescriptions (23% vs 12%; P = 0.03) and to more delays in filling others (29% vs 8%; P = 0.03). The differences were more pronounced for women and racial and ethnic minority groups in contrast to men and majority populations, respectively. Because the study samples were small, we could not conduct a detailed regression analysis.
Conclusions: The magnitude of cost-related nonadherence effects associated with partial-subsidy cost sharing suggests that the Inflation Reduction Act policy to expand low-income subsidies may boost medication adherence, most notably among women and racial and ethnic minority groups.
期刊介绍:
JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.