对新生儿重症监护中早产儿和足月儿哌拉西林的群体药代动力学模型进行外部评估。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frida S Boer-Pérez, Victoria Lima-Rogel, Ana R Mejía-Elizondo, Susanna E Medellín-Garibay, Ana S Rodríguez-Báez, Cristian J Rodríguez-Pinal, Rosa Del C Milán-Segovia, Silvia Romano-Moreno
{"title":"对新生儿重症监护中早产儿和足月儿哌拉西林的群体药代动力学模型进行外部评估。","authors":"Frida S Boer-Pérez, Victoria Lima-Rogel, Ana R Mejía-Elizondo, Susanna E Medellín-Garibay, Ana S Rodríguez-Báez, Cristian J Rodríguez-Pinal, Rosa Del C Milán-Segovia, Silvia Romano-Moreno","doi":"10.1007/s13318-024-00906-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Piperacillin/tazobactam is extensively used off-label to treat late-onset neonatal sepsis, but safety and pharmacokinetic data in this population are limited. Additionally, the organic immaturity of the newborns contributes to a high piperacillin pharmacokinetic variability. This affects the clinical efficacy of the antibiotic treatment and increases the probability of developing drug resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of reported piperacillin population pharmacokinetic models for their application in a model-informed precision dosing strategy in preterm and term Mexican neonatal intensive care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published population pharmacokinetic models for piperacillin which included neonates in their study population were identified. From the reference models, structured models, population pharmacokinetic parameters, and interindividual and residual variability data were extracted to be replicated in pharmacokinetic software (NONMEM<sup>®</sup> version 7.4). For the clinical study, a sampling schedule was designed, and 2-3 blood samples of 250 µL were taken from neonates who met the inclusion criteria. Piperacillin plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The clinical treatment data were collected, and piperacillin plasma concentrations were estimated using reference pharmacokinetic models for an a priori or Bayesian approach. Statistical methods were used in terms of bias and precision to evaluate the differences between observed and estimated neonatal piperacillin plasma concentrations with the different approaches and to identify the pharmacokinetic model that best fits the neonatal data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 plasma samples were collected from 25 neonatal patients, of which 15 were preterm neonates. The overall median value (range) postnatal age, gestational age, body weight, and serum creatinine at the sampling collecting day were 12 (3-26) days, 34.2 (26-41.1) weeks, 1.78 (0.08-3.90) Kg, 0.47 (0.20-0.90) mg/dL, respectively. Three population pharmacokinetic models for piperacillin in infants up to 2 months were identified, and their predictive performance in neonatal data was evaluated. No pharmacokinetic model was suitable for our population using an a priori approach. The model published by Cohen-Wolkowiez et al. in 2014 with a Bayesian approach showed the best performance of the pharmacokinetic models evaluated in our neonatal data. The procedure requires two blood samples (predose and postdose), and, when applied, it predicted 66.6% of the observations with a relative median absolute predicted error of less than 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The population pharmacokinetic model developed by Cohen-Wolkowiez et al. in 2014 demonstrated superior performance in predicting the plasma concentration of piperacillin in preterm and term Mexican neonatal intensive care patients. The Bayesian approach, including two different piperacillin plasma concentrations, was clinically acceptable regarding bias and precision. Its application for model-informed precision dosing can be an option to optimize the piperacillin dosage in our population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11939,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Piperacillin in Preterm and Term Patients from Neonatal Intensive Care.\",\"authors\":\"Frida S Boer-Pérez, Victoria Lima-Rogel, Ana R Mejía-Elizondo, Susanna E Medellín-Garibay, Ana S Rodríguez-Báez, Cristian J Rodríguez-Pinal, Rosa Del C Milán-Segovia, Silvia Romano-Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13318-024-00906-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Piperacillin/tazobactam is extensively used off-label to treat late-onset neonatal sepsis, but safety and pharmacokinetic data in this population are limited. Additionally, the organic immaturity of the newborns contributes to a high piperacillin pharmacokinetic variability. This affects the clinical efficacy of the antibiotic treatment and increases the probability of developing drug resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of reported piperacillin population pharmacokinetic models for their application in a model-informed precision dosing strategy in preterm and term Mexican neonatal intensive care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published population pharmacokinetic models for piperacillin which included neonates in their study population were identified. From the reference models, structured models, population pharmacokinetic parameters, and interindividual and residual variability data were extracted to be replicated in pharmacokinetic software (NONMEM<sup>®</sup> version 7.4). For the clinical study, a sampling schedule was designed, and 2-3 blood samples of 250 µL were taken from neonates who met the inclusion criteria. Piperacillin plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The clinical treatment data were collected, and piperacillin plasma concentrations were estimated using reference pharmacokinetic models for an a priori or Bayesian approach. Statistical methods were used in terms of bias and precision to evaluate the differences between observed and estimated neonatal piperacillin plasma concentrations with the different approaches and to identify the pharmacokinetic model that best fits the neonatal data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 plasma samples were collected from 25 neonatal patients, of which 15 were preterm neonates. The overall median value (range) postnatal age, gestational age, body weight, and serum creatinine at the sampling collecting day were 12 (3-26) days, 34.2 (26-41.1) weeks, 1.78 (0.08-3.90) Kg, 0.47 (0.20-0.90) mg/dL, respectively. Three population pharmacokinetic models for piperacillin in infants up to 2 months were identified, and their predictive performance in neonatal data was evaluated. No pharmacokinetic model was suitable for our population using an a priori approach. The model published by Cohen-Wolkowiez et al. in 2014 with a Bayesian approach showed the best performance of the pharmacokinetic models evaluated in our neonatal data. The procedure requires two blood samples (predose and postdose), and, when applied, it predicted 66.6% of the observations with a relative median absolute predicted error of less than 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The population pharmacokinetic model developed by Cohen-Wolkowiez et al. in 2014 demonstrated superior performance in predicting the plasma concentration of piperacillin in preterm and term Mexican neonatal intensive care patients. The Bayesian approach, including two different piperacillin plasma concentrations, was clinically acceptable regarding bias and precision. Its application for model-informed precision dosing can be an option to optimize the piperacillin dosage in our population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-024-00906-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-024-00906-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在标签外被广泛用于治疗晚期新生儿败血症,但在这一人群中的安全性和药代动力学数据十分有限。此外,新生儿的器质性不成熟也导致了哌拉西林药代动力学的高变异性。这会影响抗生素治疗的临床疗效,并增加产生耐药性的可能性。本研究旨在评估已报道的哌拉西林群体药代动力学模型的预测性能,以便在早产和足月墨西哥新生儿重症监护患者中应用以模型为依据的精确给药策略:方法: 对已发表的哌拉西林群体药代动力学模型进行了鉴定,这些模型的研究对象包括新生儿。从参考模型中提取结构化模型、群体药代动力学参数以及个体间和残差数据,在药代动力学软件(NONMEM® 7.4 版)中进行复制。在临床研究中,设计了一个采样计划,从符合纳入标准的新生儿中采集 2-3 份 250 µL 的血样。通过液相色谱/串联质谱法测定哌拉西林的血浆浓度。收集临床治疗数据,并使用先验或贝叶斯方法的参考药代动力学模型估算哌拉西林的血浆浓度。从偏差和精确度的角度使用统计方法评估不同方法观察到的和估计的新生儿哌拉西林血浆浓度之间的差异,并确定最适合新生儿数据的药代动力学模型:共采集了 25 名新生儿患者的 70 份血浆样本,其中 15 人为早产新生儿。采样日的产后年龄、胎龄、体重和血清肌酐的总体中位值(范围)分别为 12(3-26)天、34.2(26-41.1)周、1.78(0.08-3.90)千克、0.47(0.20-0.90)毫克/分升。针对 2 个月以下婴儿的哌拉西林,确定了三种群体药代动力学模型,并对其在新生儿数据中的预测性能进行了评估。根据先验方法,没有一个药代动力学模型适合我们的人群。Cohen-Wolkowiez 等人于 2014 年发表的贝叶斯方法模型在我们的新生儿数据中显示出了药代动力学模型的最佳性能。该程序需要两次血液样本(用药前和用药后),在应用时,它预测了 66.6% 的观察结果,相对中位绝对预测误差小于 30%:Cohen-Wolkowiez等人于2014年开发的群体药代动力学模型在预测墨西哥早产儿和足月新生儿重症监护患者的哌拉西林血浆浓度方面表现优异。贝叶斯方法包括两种不同的哌拉西林血浆浓度,其偏差和精确度在临床上是可以接受的。在我们的人群中,应用贝叶斯方法进行以模型为依据的精确用药可以优化哌拉西林的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Piperacillin in Preterm and Term Patients from Neonatal Intensive Care.

External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Piperacillin in Preterm and Term Patients from Neonatal Intensive Care.

Background and objectives: Piperacillin/tazobactam is extensively used off-label to treat late-onset neonatal sepsis, but safety and pharmacokinetic data in this population are limited. Additionally, the organic immaturity of the newborns contributes to a high piperacillin pharmacokinetic variability. This affects the clinical efficacy of the antibiotic treatment and increases the probability of developing drug resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of reported piperacillin population pharmacokinetic models for their application in a model-informed precision dosing strategy in preterm and term Mexican neonatal intensive care patients.

Methods: Published population pharmacokinetic models for piperacillin which included neonates in their study population were identified. From the reference models, structured models, population pharmacokinetic parameters, and interindividual and residual variability data were extracted to be replicated in pharmacokinetic software (NONMEM® version 7.4). For the clinical study, a sampling schedule was designed, and 2-3 blood samples of 250 µL were taken from neonates who met the inclusion criteria. Piperacillin plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The clinical treatment data were collected, and piperacillin plasma concentrations were estimated using reference pharmacokinetic models for an a priori or Bayesian approach. Statistical methods were used in terms of bias and precision to evaluate the differences between observed and estimated neonatal piperacillin plasma concentrations with the different approaches and to identify the pharmacokinetic model that best fits the neonatal data.

Results: A total of 70 plasma samples were collected from 25 neonatal patients, of which 15 were preterm neonates. The overall median value (range) postnatal age, gestational age, body weight, and serum creatinine at the sampling collecting day were 12 (3-26) days, 34.2 (26-41.1) weeks, 1.78 (0.08-3.90) Kg, 0.47 (0.20-0.90) mg/dL, respectively. Three population pharmacokinetic models for piperacillin in infants up to 2 months were identified, and their predictive performance in neonatal data was evaluated. No pharmacokinetic model was suitable for our population using an a priori approach. The model published by Cohen-Wolkowiez et al. in 2014 with a Bayesian approach showed the best performance of the pharmacokinetic models evaluated in our neonatal data. The procedure requires two blood samples (predose and postdose), and, when applied, it predicted 66.6% of the observations with a relative median absolute predicted error of less than 30%.

Conclusions: The population pharmacokinetic model developed by Cohen-Wolkowiez et al. in 2014 demonstrated superior performance in predicting the plasma concentration of piperacillin in preterm and term Mexican neonatal intensive care patients. The Bayesian approach, including two different piperacillin plasma concentrations, was clinically acceptable regarding bias and precision. Its application for model-informed precision dosing can be an option to optimize the piperacillin dosage in our population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal focuses mainly on new and emerging diagnostic and treatment options, protocols and molecular and cellular basis of disease pathogenesis, new technologies, in liver and biliary sciences. Hepatology International publishes original research articles related to clinical care and basic research; review articles; consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment; invited editorials, and controversies in contemporary issues. The journal does not publish case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信