改善对有学习障碍的老年人和家庭照顾者的支持并提前规划:一项混合方法研究。

Sara Ryan, Louise Wallace, Elizabeth Tilley, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, Magdalena Mikulak, Rebecca Anderson, Angeli Vaid, Pam Bebbington, Richard Keagan-Bull, Emmie Morrissey, Angela Martin
{"title":"改善对有学习障碍的老年人和家庭照顾者的支持并提前规划:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Sara Ryan, Louise Wallace, Elizabeth Tilley, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, Magdalena Mikulak, Rebecca Anderson, Angeli Vaid, Pam Bebbington, Richard Keagan-Bull, Emmie Morrissey, Angela Martin","doi":"10.3310/MTHW2644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with learning disabilities are living longer. Despite government policy to encourage people to lead supported lives in their community, family carers often maintain support due to dissatisfaction with services. This can lead to people moving from the family home in a crisis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Find out what is known about health needs and resources for older people with learning disabilities (aged ≥ 40 years); (2) identify exemplars of good services for older people with learning disabilities; (3) explore service exemplars through ethnographic case studies; (4) evaluate support for older people with learning disabilities and their families through co-producing and testing future planning tools and (5) co-produce recommendations and resources.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Work package 1 rapid scoping reviews - three reviews focused on the health and social care needs of older people with learning disabilities and 'behaviours that challenge others', and family carers, and the co-ordination of support for this group. Work package 2 scoping and mapping exemplars of good practice - analysis of published service standards to assess excellence criteria, by mapping services, interviews (<i>n</i> = 30), survey (<i>n</i> = 9) and informal discussion with commissioners. Work package 3 ethnography of case studies of exemplar provision; independent supported living (<i>n</i> = 4); residential/nursing home (<i>n</i> = 2); day activities (<i>n</i> = 1), Shared Lives (<i>n</i> = 2). Fieldwork (20 days per model), interviews (<i>n</i> = 77) with older people with learning disabilities, family carers, support staff and commissioners. Work package 4 - co-producing and testing resources for older people with learning disabilities and their families involved interviews and focus groups with 36 people with learning disabilities, parents, and siblings, and experience-based co-design with 11 participants. Eight families evaluated the resources. Work package 5 - three stakeholder workshops co-produced service recommendations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The reviews confirmed an inadequate evidence base concerning the experiences and support of family carers and older people with learning disabilities and 'behaviours that challenge others'. Criteria of excellence were produced, and a shortlist of 15 services was identified for consideration in work package 3. The ethnographic work found that environmental, organisational and social factors were important, including supporting independence and choice about who people live with, matching staff to people, consistent relationships and adapting to ageing. Practices of institutionalisation were observed. In work package 4, we found that families were worried about the future and unsupported to explore options. 'Planning Ahead' cards and a booklet to record discussions were produced, and the evaluation was positively rated. Finally, formative discussion informed recommendations. Outputs include training packages, a carers' forum, a film, a podcast and academic papers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is little focus on older people with learning disabilities and family carers. Services vary in their approach to planning for older-age support. Families are unsupported to plan, leaving people without choice. 'Behaviours that challenge others' was found to be unhelpful terminology. Recommendations: A new strategy is recommended for older people with learning disabilities and family carers that encompasses commissioning practices, professional input and peer learning, proactive support in ageing well and excellent service design.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic created recruitment challenges. Reliance on providers for recruitment resulted in a lack of diversity in work package 3. Families' plans, and therefore change, may be frustrated by insufficient service resources.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Given the lack of focus in this area, there is a range of future work to consider: experiences of older people with learning disabilities from diverse ethnic backgrounds; supporting people to age and die 'in place'; best practice regarding designing/commissioning services, including housing; the role of social workers; access to nature; accessing mainstream support; and evaluation of the 'Planning Ahead' cards.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN74264887.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129491) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 16. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"12 16","pages":"1-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Ryan, Louise Wallace, Elizabeth Tilley, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, Magdalena Mikulak, Rebecca Anderson, Angeli Vaid, Pam Bebbington, Richard Keagan-Bull, Emmie Morrissey, Angela Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/MTHW2644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with learning disabilities are living longer. Despite government policy to encourage people to lead supported lives in their community, family carers often maintain support due to dissatisfaction with services. This can lead to people moving from the family home in a crisis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Find out what is known about health needs and resources for older people with learning disabilities (aged ≥ 40 years); (2) identify exemplars of good services for older people with learning disabilities; (3) explore service exemplars through ethnographic case studies; (4) evaluate support for older people with learning disabilities and their families through co-producing and testing future planning tools and (5) co-produce recommendations and resources.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Work package 1 rapid scoping reviews - three reviews focused on the health and social care needs of older people with learning disabilities and 'behaviours that challenge others', and family carers, and the co-ordination of support for this group. Work package 2 scoping and mapping exemplars of good practice - analysis of published service standards to assess excellence criteria, by mapping services, interviews (<i>n</i> = 30), survey (<i>n</i> = 9) and informal discussion with commissioners. Work package 3 ethnography of case studies of exemplar provision; independent supported living (<i>n</i> = 4); residential/nursing home (<i>n</i> = 2); day activities (<i>n</i> = 1), Shared Lives (<i>n</i> = 2). Fieldwork (20 days per model), interviews (<i>n</i> = 77) with older people with learning disabilities, family carers, support staff and commissioners. Work package 4 - co-producing and testing resources for older people with learning disabilities and their families involved interviews and focus groups with 36 people with learning disabilities, parents, and siblings, and experience-based co-design with 11 participants. Eight families evaluated the resources. Work package 5 - three stakeholder workshops co-produced service recommendations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The reviews confirmed an inadequate evidence base concerning the experiences and support of family carers and older people with learning disabilities and 'behaviours that challenge others'. Criteria of excellence were produced, and a shortlist of 15 services was identified for consideration in work package 3. The ethnographic work found that environmental, organisational and social factors were important, including supporting independence and choice about who people live with, matching staff to people, consistent relationships and adapting to ageing. Practices of institutionalisation were observed. In work package 4, we found that families were worried about the future and unsupported to explore options. 'Planning Ahead' cards and a booklet to record discussions were produced, and the evaluation was positively rated. Finally, formative discussion informed recommendations. Outputs include training packages, a carers' forum, a film, a podcast and academic papers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is little focus on older people with learning disabilities and family carers. Services vary in their approach to planning for older-age support. Families are unsupported to plan, leaving people without choice. 'Behaviours that challenge others' was found to be unhelpful terminology. Recommendations: A new strategy is recommended for older people with learning disabilities and family carers that encompasses commissioning practices, professional input and peer learning, proactive support in ageing well and excellent service design.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic created recruitment challenges. Reliance on providers for recruitment resulted in a lack of diversity in work package 3. Families' plans, and therefore change, may be frustrated by insufficient service resources.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Given the lack of focus in this area, there is a range of future work to consider: experiences of older people with learning disabilities from diverse ethnic backgrounds; supporting people to age and die 'in place'; best practice regarding designing/commissioning services, including housing; the role of social workers; access to nature; accessing mainstream support; and evaluation of the 'Planning Ahead' cards.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN74264887.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129491) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 16. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"volume\":\"12 16\",\"pages\":\"1-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/MTHW2644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/MTHW2644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有学习障碍的人寿命越来越长。尽管政府的政策是鼓励他们在社区中过有支持的生活,但由于对服务不满意,家庭照护者通常会继续提供支持。目标:(1)了解有学习障碍的老年人(年龄≥ 40 岁)的健康需求和资源;(2)确定为有学习障碍的老年人提供良好服务的范例;(3)通过人种学案例研究探索服务范例;(4)通过共同制作和测试未来规划工具,评估为有学习障碍的老年人及其家人提供的支持;(5)共同制作建议和资源:工作包 1 快速范围界定审查--三项审查的重点是有学习障碍和 "挑战他人的行为 "的老年人、家庭照顾者的健康和社会护理需求,以及对这一群体的支持协调。工作包 2 确定范围并绘制良好实践范例图--通过绘制服务图、访谈(30 人)、调查(9 人)以及与专员进行非正式讨论,分析已发布的服务标准,以评估卓越标准。工作包 3:对示范服务案例进行人种学研究;独立辅助生活(4 个);寄宿/护理之家(2 个);日间活动(1 个);共享生活(2 个)。实地调查(每种模式 20 天),与有学习障碍的老年人、家庭照顾者、辅助人员和专员进行访谈(n = 77)。工作包 4--为有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭共同制作和测试资源,包括与 36 名有学习障碍的老年人、父母和兄弟姐妹进行访谈和焦点小组讨论,以及与 11 名参与者进行基于经验的共同设计。8 个家庭对资源进行了评估。工作包 5--三个利益相关者研讨会共同提出了服务建议:审查证实,有关家庭照顾者和有学习障碍及 "挑战他人的行为 "的老年人的经验和支持的证据基础不足。制定了卓越标准,并确定了一份包含 15 项服务的短名单,供工作包 3 审议。人种学工作发现,环境、组织和社会因素都很重要,包括支持独立和选择与谁生活在一起、工作人员与人的匹配、一致的关系和适应老龄化。我们还观察到了机构化的做法。在工作包 4 中,我们发现家庭对未来忧心忡忡,在探索各种选择时得不到支持。我们制作了 "未雨绸缪 "卡和小册子来记录讨论情况,评估结果得到了积极评价。最后,通过形成性讨论提出了建议。成果包括培训教材、照顾者论坛、电影、播客和学术论文:对有学习障碍的老年人和家庭照顾者的关注很少。服务机构对老年支持的规划方法各不相同。家庭在规划方面得不到支持,使人们没有选择的余地。挑战他人的行为 "被认为是无益的术语。建议:建议为有学习障碍的老年人和家庭照顾者制定一项新的战略,其中包括委托实践、专业投入和同伴学习、积极主动的老龄化支持以及优秀的服务设计:局限性:COVID-19 大流行给招聘工作带来了挑战。局限性:COVID-19 大流行带来了招聘方面的挑战,依赖于提供者的招聘导致工作包 3 缺乏多样性。未来的工作:鉴于在这一领域缺乏重点,未来有一系列工作需要考虑:来自不同种族背景的有学习障碍的老年人的经验;支持人们 "就地 "养老和死亡;设计/委托服务(包括住房)的最佳实践;社工的作用;接触自然;获得主流支持;以及对 "提前规划 "卡的评估:该试验的注册号为 ISRCTN74264887:该奖项由国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)的健康与社会护理服务研究计划(NIHR奖项编号:NIHR129491)资助,全文发表于《健康与社会护理服务研究》第12卷第16期。如需了解更多奖项信息,请访问 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.

Background: People with learning disabilities are living longer. Despite government policy to encourage people to lead supported lives in their community, family carers often maintain support due to dissatisfaction with services. This can lead to people moving from the family home in a crisis.

Objectives: (1) Find out what is known about health needs and resources for older people with learning disabilities (aged ≥ 40 years); (2) identify exemplars of good services for older people with learning disabilities; (3) explore service exemplars through ethnographic case studies; (4) evaluate support for older people with learning disabilities and their families through co-producing and testing future planning tools and (5) co-produce recommendations and resources.

Design and methods: Work package 1 rapid scoping reviews - three reviews focused on the health and social care needs of older people with learning disabilities and 'behaviours that challenge others', and family carers, and the co-ordination of support for this group. Work package 2 scoping and mapping exemplars of good practice - analysis of published service standards to assess excellence criteria, by mapping services, interviews (n = 30), survey (n = 9) and informal discussion with commissioners. Work package 3 ethnography of case studies of exemplar provision; independent supported living (n = 4); residential/nursing home (n = 2); day activities (n = 1), Shared Lives (n = 2). Fieldwork (20 days per model), interviews (n = 77) with older people with learning disabilities, family carers, support staff and commissioners. Work package 4 - co-producing and testing resources for older people with learning disabilities and their families involved interviews and focus groups with 36 people with learning disabilities, parents, and siblings, and experience-based co-design with 11 participants. Eight families evaluated the resources. Work package 5 - three stakeholder workshops co-produced service recommendations.

Findings: The reviews confirmed an inadequate evidence base concerning the experiences and support of family carers and older people with learning disabilities and 'behaviours that challenge others'. Criteria of excellence were produced, and a shortlist of 15 services was identified for consideration in work package 3. The ethnographic work found that environmental, organisational and social factors were important, including supporting independence and choice about who people live with, matching staff to people, consistent relationships and adapting to ageing. Practices of institutionalisation were observed. In work package 4, we found that families were worried about the future and unsupported to explore options. 'Planning Ahead' cards and a booklet to record discussions were produced, and the evaluation was positively rated. Finally, formative discussion informed recommendations. Outputs include training packages, a carers' forum, a film, a podcast and academic papers.

Conclusions: There is little focus on older people with learning disabilities and family carers. Services vary in their approach to planning for older-age support. Families are unsupported to plan, leaving people without choice. 'Behaviours that challenge others' was found to be unhelpful terminology. Recommendations: A new strategy is recommended for older people with learning disabilities and family carers that encompasses commissioning practices, professional input and peer learning, proactive support in ageing well and excellent service design.

Limitations: The COVID-19 pandemic created recruitment challenges. Reliance on providers for recruitment resulted in a lack of diversity in work package 3. Families' plans, and therefore change, may be frustrated by insufficient service resources.

Future work: Given the lack of focus in this area, there is a range of future work to consider: experiences of older people with learning disabilities from diverse ethnic backgrounds; supporting people to age and die 'in place'; best practice regarding designing/commissioning services, including housing; the role of social workers; access to nature; accessing mainstream support; and evaluation of the 'Planning Ahead' cards.

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN74264887.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129491) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 16. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信