学术介入放射科医生的学术影响力与行业贡献之间的关联。

Mahee Islam, Jasmine Lee, Bunchhin Huy, Srinidhi Shanmugasundaram, Abhishek Kumar, Pratik Shukla
{"title":"学术介入放射科医生的学术影响力与行业贡献之间的关联。","authors":"Mahee Islam, Jasmine Lee, Bunchhin Huy, Srinidhi Shanmugasundaram, Abhishek Kumar, Pratik Shukla","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Physician Sunshine Act of 2010 aimed to increase public awareness of physician-industry relationships. Our objective was to evaluate whether there is an association between scholarly impact and industry funding among academic interventional radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database from a prior study with our group was used in which we had investigated H-indices among US interventional radiologists; academic rank, gender, institution, and geographic location were obtained. The Scopus database was queried to determine all physicians' H-index. The CMS Open Payments database was used to determine industry payments from 2015 to 2021 for each interventional radiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>H-index and professor rank positively and significantly correlated with industrial funding (H-index coefficient = $6,977, P < .001 and professor rank coefficient = $183,902, P = .003). Industry funding was found to be significantly different between all ranks. Among 830 academic interventional radiologists, the mean industrial funding of male physicians was $130,034, which was significantly higher than female physicians' $28,166 (P = .00013). By academic rank, male primary investigators of associate professor and unranked position had higher industrial funding than female primary investigators (Wilcoxon test, P = .029 and P= .039, respectively). Professor and assistant professor ranks had no significant difference in industrial funding between male and female physicians (Wilcoxon's test, P = .080 and P = .053, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scholarly activity as defined by the H-index and academic rank seem to have a positive association with industry funding of academic interventional radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Scholarly Impact to Industrial Contributions Among Academic Interventional Radiologists.\",\"authors\":\"Mahee Islam, Jasmine Lee, Bunchhin Huy, Srinidhi Shanmugasundaram, Abhishek Kumar, Pratik Shukla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Physician Sunshine Act of 2010 aimed to increase public awareness of physician-industry relationships. Our objective was to evaluate whether there is an association between scholarly impact and industry funding among academic interventional radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database from a prior study with our group was used in which we had investigated H-indices among US interventional radiologists; academic rank, gender, institution, and geographic location were obtained. The Scopus database was queried to determine all physicians' H-index. The CMS Open Payments database was used to determine industry payments from 2015 to 2021 for each interventional radiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>H-index and professor rank positively and significantly correlated with industrial funding (H-index coefficient = $6,977, P < .001 and professor rank coefficient = $183,902, P = .003). Industry funding was found to be significantly different between all ranks. Among 830 academic interventional radiologists, the mean industrial funding of male physicians was $130,034, which was significantly higher than female physicians' $28,166 (P = .00013). By academic rank, male primary investigators of associate professor and unranked position had higher industrial funding than female primary investigators (Wilcoxon test, P = .029 and P= .039, respectively). Professor and assistant professor ranks had no significant difference in industrial funding between male and female physicians (Wilcoxon's test, P = .080 and P = .053, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scholarly activity as defined by the H-index and academic rank seem to have a positive association with industry funding of academic interventional radiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.06.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.06.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2010 年《医生阳光法案》旨在提高公众对医生与行业关系的认识。我们的目的是评估学术介入放射医师的学术影响力与行业资助之间是否存在关联:我们使用了我们小组之前研究的一个数据库,在该数据库中我们调查了美国介入放射科医生的 H 指数;并获得了学术排名、性别、机构和地理位置。我们查询了 Scopus 数据库,以确定所有医生的 H 指数。利用 CMS Open Payments 数据库确定了每位介入放射科医生 2015 年至 2021 年的行业薪酬:H指数和教授级别与行业资助呈显著正相关(H指数系数=6,977美元,P < .001;教授级别系数=183,902美元,P = .003)。所有级别之间的行业资助均有明显差异。在 830 名学术介入放射科医生中,男性医生的平均行业资助为 130,034 美元,明显高于女性医生的 28,166 美元(P = .00013)。按学术职级划分,副教授和无职级的男性主要研究人员的行业资助高于女性主要研究人员(Wilcoxon 检验,P = .029 和 P= .039)。教授和助理教授级别的男女医生在工业资助方面没有显著差异(Wilcoxon 检验,P = .080 和 P = .053):结论:由 H 指数和学术级别定义的学术活动似乎与介入放射科医师的行业资助有积极的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Scholarly Impact to Industrial Contributions Among Academic Interventional Radiologists.

Objective: The Physician Sunshine Act of 2010 aimed to increase public awareness of physician-industry relationships. Our objective was to evaluate whether there is an association between scholarly impact and industry funding among academic interventional radiologists.

Methods: A database from a prior study with our group was used in which we had investigated H-indices among US interventional radiologists; academic rank, gender, institution, and geographic location were obtained. The Scopus database was queried to determine all physicians' H-index. The CMS Open Payments database was used to determine industry payments from 2015 to 2021 for each interventional radiologist.

Results: H-index and professor rank positively and significantly correlated with industrial funding (H-index coefficient = $6,977, P < .001 and professor rank coefficient = $183,902, P = .003). Industry funding was found to be significantly different between all ranks. Among 830 academic interventional radiologists, the mean industrial funding of male physicians was $130,034, which was significantly higher than female physicians' $28,166 (P = .00013). By academic rank, male primary investigators of associate professor and unranked position had higher industrial funding than female primary investigators (Wilcoxon test, P = .029 and P= .039, respectively). Professor and assistant professor ranks had no significant difference in industrial funding between male and female physicians (Wilcoxon's test, P = .080 and P = .053, respectively).

Conclusion: Scholarly activity as defined by the H-index and academic rank seem to have a positive association with industry funding of academic interventional radiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信