在社区居住的高跌倒风险老年人中进行的四项功能测试的重复测试可靠性和最小检测变化。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Roongnapa Intaruk, Supaporn Phadungkit, Anongnat Kanpai, Ketmanee Pawanta, Nuttanicha Srihapol, Jittima Saengsuwan, Sugalya Amatachaya, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij
{"title":"在社区居住的高跌倒风险老年人中进行的四项功能测试的重复测试可靠性和最小检测变化。","authors":"Roongnapa Intaruk, Supaporn Phadungkit, Anongnat Kanpai, Ketmanee Pawanta, Nuttanicha Srihapol, Jittima Saengsuwan, Sugalya Amatachaya, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to quantify test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the four commonly used functional tests in older adults with a high risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 community-dwelling older adults (26 females, 4 males; mean age: 73.7±6.0 years; range, 65 to 88 years) with a high fall risk identified by the Thai falls risk assessment test between November 2018 and May 2019. Data from the 10-m walk test at a comfortable gait speed (CGS) and fast gait speed (FGS), timed up and go (TUG) test, five times sit to stand test (FTSST), and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were collected twice for each participant. The interval between test sessions was one week. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and MDC at the 95% confidence interval (MDC<sub>95</sub>) were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four functional tests had ICC in the range of 0.92 to 0.97. The SEM values of the CGS, FGS, TUG, FTSST, and 6MWT were 0.06 m/sec, 0.04 m/sec, 1.10 sec, 1.30 sec, and 20.60 m, respectively. The MDC<sub>95</sub> values of the CGS, FGS, TUG, FTSST, and 6MWT were 0.16 m/sec, 0.12 m/sec, 3.00 sec, 3.50 sec, and 57.20 m, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All functional tests demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability. The SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> of all functional tests were established. These findings can help clinicians interpret the effectiveness of interventions and determine changes in functional ability over time in older adults at high risk of falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 2","pages":"164-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of four functional tests in community-dwelling older adults with high risk of falls.\",\"authors\":\"Roongnapa Intaruk, Supaporn Phadungkit, Anongnat Kanpai, Ketmanee Pawanta, Nuttanicha Srihapol, Jittima Saengsuwan, Sugalya Amatachaya, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to quantify test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the four commonly used functional tests in older adults with a high risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 community-dwelling older adults (26 females, 4 males; mean age: 73.7±6.0 years; range, 65 to 88 years) with a high fall risk identified by the Thai falls risk assessment test between November 2018 and May 2019. Data from the 10-m walk test at a comfortable gait speed (CGS) and fast gait speed (FGS), timed up and go (TUG) test, five times sit to stand test (FTSST), and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were collected twice for each participant. The interval between test sessions was one week. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and MDC at the 95% confidence interval (MDC<sub>95</sub>) were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four functional tests had ICC in the range of 0.92 to 0.97. The SEM values of the CGS, FGS, TUG, FTSST, and 6MWT were 0.06 m/sec, 0.04 m/sec, 1.10 sec, 1.30 sec, and 20.60 m, respectively. The MDC<sub>95</sub> values of the CGS, FGS, TUG, FTSST, and 6MWT were 0.16 m/sec, 0.12 m/sec, 3.00 sec, 3.50 sec, and 57.20 m, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All functional tests demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability. The SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> of all functional tests were established. These findings can help clinicians interpret the effectiveness of interventions and determine changes in functional ability over time in older adults at high risk of falls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"70 2\",\"pages\":\"164-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在量化四种常用功能测试在高跌倒风险老年人中的重复测试可靠性和最小可检测变化(MDC):这项横断面研究在 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 5 月期间对 30 名社区居住的老年人(26 名女性,4 名男性;平均年龄:73.7±6.0 岁;范围:65 岁至 88 岁)进行了研究,这些老年人通过泰国跌倒风险评估测试确定具有较高的跌倒风险。每位参与者均收集了两次舒适步速(CGS)和快速步速(FGS)10米步行测试、定时起立(TUG)测试、五次坐立测试(FTSST)和6分钟步行测试(6MWT)的数据。两次测试之间的间隔为一周。采用类内相关系数(ICC)分析重测可靠性。此外,还计算了测量标准误差(SEM)和 95% 置信区间的 MDC(MDC95):四项功能测试的 ICC 在 0.92 至 0.97 之间。CGS、FGS、TUG、FTSST 和 6MWT 的 SEM 值分别为 0.06 米/秒、0.04 米/秒、1.10 秒、1.30 秒和 20.60 米。CGS、FGS、TUG、FTSST 和 6MWT 的 MDC95 值分别为 0.16 米/秒、0.12 米/秒、3.00 秒、3.50 秒和 57.20 米:结论:所有功能测试均显示出极佳的测试-再测试可靠性。所有功能测试的 SEM 和 MDC95 均已确定。这些发现有助于临床医生解释干预措施的有效性,并确定高跌倒风险老年人的功能能力随时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of four functional tests in community-dwelling older adults with high risk of falls.

Objectives: This study aimed to quantify test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the four commonly used functional tests in older adults with a high risk of falling.

Patients and methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 community-dwelling older adults (26 females, 4 males; mean age: 73.7±6.0 years; range, 65 to 88 years) with a high fall risk identified by the Thai falls risk assessment test between November 2018 and May 2019. Data from the 10-m walk test at a comfortable gait speed (CGS) and fast gait speed (FGS), timed up and go (TUG) test, five times sit to stand test (FTSST), and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were collected twice for each participant. The interval between test sessions was one week. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and MDC at the 95% confidence interval (MDC95) were also calculated.

Results: The four functional tests had ICC in the range of 0.92 to 0.97. The SEM values of the CGS, FGS, TUG, FTSST, and 6MWT were 0.06 m/sec, 0.04 m/sec, 1.10 sec, 1.30 sec, and 20.60 m, respectively. The MDC95 values of the CGS, FGS, TUG, FTSST, and 6MWT were 0.16 m/sec, 0.12 m/sec, 3.00 sec, 3.50 sec, and 57.20 m, respectively.

Conclusion: All functional tests demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability. The SEM and MDC95 of all functional tests were established. These findings can help clinicians interpret the effectiveness of interventions and determine changes in functional ability over time in older adults at high risk of falls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信