物理治疗师和患者报告的腰背痛积极物理治疗指南实施障碍:基于理论的定性研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Liedewij Bogaert , Simon Brumagne , Charlotte Léonard , Amber Lauwers , Sanne Peters
{"title":"物理治疗师和患者报告的腰背痛积极物理治疗指南实施障碍:基于理论的定性研究。","authors":"Liedewij Bogaert ,&nbsp;Simon Brumagne ,&nbsp;Charlotte Léonard ,&nbsp;Amber Lauwers ,&nbsp;Sanne Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Adoption of low back pain (LBP) guidelines in physiotherapeutic management is a well-documented problem. Thereby, an in-depth understanding of the barriers to implement an active approach for both patients and physiotherapists is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists and patients with non-specific LBP. Interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 20 participants were interviewed, including ten physiotherapists and ten patients. Our findings reveal that patients and physiotherapists face each 23 barriers spanning 14 TDF domains. The TDF domain “social influences” revealed the most barriers, followed by “beliefs about consequences” and “environmental context” for patients and physiotherapists, respectively. Five barriers did overlap between both groups (lack of guideline awareness, incorrect exercise performance, interdisciplinary communication gaps, time constraints and challenges in patient compliance).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Barriers to LBP guideline recommended physiotherapeutic practices span all 14 TDF domains. Consequently, future implementation interventions need to address multiple TDF domains for effective LBP guideline implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 103129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Liedewij Bogaert ,&nbsp;Simon Brumagne ,&nbsp;Charlotte Léonard ,&nbsp;Amber Lauwers ,&nbsp;Sanne Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Adoption of low back pain (LBP) guidelines in physiotherapeutic management is a well-documented problem. Thereby, an in-depth understanding of the barriers to implement an active approach for both patients and physiotherapists is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists and patients with non-specific LBP. Interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 20 participants were interviewed, including ten physiotherapists and ten patients. Our findings reveal that patients and physiotherapists face each 23 barriers spanning 14 TDF domains. The TDF domain “social influences” revealed the most barriers, followed by “beliefs about consequences” and “environmental context” for patients and physiotherapists, respectively. Five barriers did overlap between both groups (lack of guideline awareness, incorrect exercise performance, interdisciplinary communication gaps, time constraints and challenges in patient compliance).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Barriers to LBP guideline recommended physiotherapeutic practices span all 14 TDF domains. Consequently, future implementation interventions need to address multiple TDF domains for effective LBP guideline implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在物理治疗管理中采用腰背痛(LBP)指南是一个有据可查的问题。因此,需要深入了解患者和物理治疗师在实施积极方法时遇到的障碍:设计:对物理治疗师和非特异性腰椎间盘突出症患者进行了半结构式访谈。访谈以理论领域框架(TDF)为指导,使用鲁汶定性分析指南进行分析:共有 20 名参与者接受了访谈,其中包括 10 名物理治疗师和 10 名患者。我们的研究结果表明,患者和物理治疗师分别面临 23 种障碍,跨越 14 个 TDF 领域。在 TDF 的 "社会影响 "领域,患者和物理治疗师面临的障碍最多,其次分别是 "对后果的信念 "和 "环境背景"。有五个障碍在两组之间存在重叠(缺乏指南意识、不正确的运动表现、跨学科沟通差距、时间限制和患者依从性方面的挑战):结论:枸杞多糖症指南所推荐的理疗实践面临的障碍涉及所有 14 个 TDF 领域。因此,未来的实施干预措施需要涉及多个 TDF 领域,以有效实施枸杞多糖指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study

Background and objective

Adoption of low back pain (LBP) guidelines in physiotherapeutic management is a well-documented problem. Thereby, an in-depth understanding of the barriers to implement an active approach for both patients and physiotherapists is needed.

Design

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists and patients with non-specific LBP. Interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.

Results

A total of 20 participants were interviewed, including ten physiotherapists and ten patients. Our findings reveal that patients and physiotherapists face each 23 barriers spanning 14 TDF domains. The TDF domain “social influences” revealed the most barriers, followed by “beliefs about consequences” and “environmental context” for patients and physiotherapists, respectively. Five barriers did overlap between both groups (lack of guideline awareness, incorrect exercise performance, interdisciplinary communication gaps, time constraints and challenges in patient compliance).

Conclusions

Barriers to LBP guideline recommended physiotherapeutic practices span all 14 TDF domains. Consequently, future implementation interventions need to address multiple TDF domains for effective LBP guideline implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信