偏重肌肉的手动疗法对肩周炎患者的肩关节运动学、肌肉表现、功能障碍和疼痛的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Chun-Kai Tang, Yi-Fen Shih, Chun-Shou Lee
{"title":"偏重肌肉的手动疗法对肩周炎患者的肩关节运动学、肌肉表现、功能障碍和疼痛的影响。","authors":"Chun-Kai Tang, Yi-Fen Shih, Chun-Shou Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frozen shoulder (FS) is characterized by restricted active and passive shoulder mobility and pain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Compare the effect of muscle-biased manual therapy (MM) and regular physical therapy (RPT) in patients with FS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pretest-post-test control group study design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 34 patients with FS and compared the effect of 12-session MM and RPT. The outcome measures were scapular kinematics and muscle activation, scapular alignment, shoulder range of motion, and pain intensity. Two-way analysis of variance was used to examine the intervention effect with α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both programs resulted in similar improvements in pain and shoulder function. Compared to the RPT, MM resulted in increased posterior tilt (MM: 7.04°-16.09°, RPT: -2.50° to -4.37°; p = 0.002; ES = 0.261) and lower trapezius activation (MM: 260.61%-470.90%, RPT: 322.64%-313.33%; p = 0.033; ES = 0.134) during scaption, and increased posterior tilt (MM: 0.70°-15.16°, RPT: -9.66° to -6.44°; p = 0.007; ES = 0.205) during the hand-to-neck task. The MM group also showed increased GH backward elevation (MM: 37.18°-42.79°, RPT: 43.64°-40.83°; p = 0.004, ES = 0.237) and scapular downward rotation (MM: -2.48° to 6.80°, RPT: 1.93°-1.44°; p < 0.001; ES = 0.404) during the thumb-to-waist task, enhanced shoulder abduction (MM: 84.6°-102.3°, RPT: 85.1°-92.9°; p = 0.02; ES = 0.153), and improved scapular alignment (MM: 10.4-9.65 cm, RPT: 9.41-9.56 cm; p = 0.02; ES = 0.114).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MM was superior to the RPT regarding scapular neuromuscular performance. Clinicians should consider adding muscle-biased treatment when treating FS.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of muscle-biased manual therapy on shoulder kinematics, muscle performance, functional impairment, and pain in patients with frozen shoulder.\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Kai Tang, Yi-Fen Shih, Chun-Shou Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2024.02.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frozen shoulder (FS) is characterized by restricted active and passive shoulder mobility and pain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Compare the effect of muscle-biased manual therapy (MM) and regular physical therapy (RPT) in patients with FS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pretest-post-test control group study design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 34 patients with FS and compared the effect of 12-session MM and RPT. The outcome measures were scapular kinematics and muscle activation, scapular alignment, shoulder range of motion, and pain intensity. Two-way analysis of variance was used to examine the intervention effect with α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both programs resulted in similar improvements in pain and shoulder function. Compared to the RPT, MM resulted in increased posterior tilt (MM: 7.04°-16.09°, RPT: -2.50° to -4.37°; p = 0.002; ES = 0.261) and lower trapezius activation (MM: 260.61%-470.90%, RPT: 322.64%-313.33%; p = 0.033; ES = 0.134) during scaption, and increased posterior tilt (MM: 0.70°-15.16°, RPT: -9.66° to -6.44°; p = 0.007; ES = 0.205) during the hand-to-neck task. The MM group also showed increased GH backward elevation (MM: 37.18°-42.79°, RPT: 43.64°-40.83°; p = 0.004, ES = 0.237) and scapular downward rotation (MM: -2.48° to 6.80°, RPT: 1.93°-1.44°; p < 0.001; ES = 0.404) during the thumb-to-waist task, enhanced shoulder abduction (MM: 84.6°-102.3°, RPT: 85.1°-92.9°; p = 0.02; ES = 0.153), and improved scapular alignment (MM: 10.4-9.65 cm, RPT: 9.41-9.56 cm; p = 0.02; ES = 0.114).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MM was superior to the RPT regarding scapular neuromuscular performance. Clinicians should consider adding muscle-biased treatment when treating FS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.02.010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.02.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩周炎(FS)以肩部主动和被动活动受限及疼痛为特征:肩周炎(FS)以肩部主动和被动活动受限及疼痛为特征。目的:比较肌肉偏倚手法治疗(MM)和常规物理治疗(RPT)对肩周炎患者的效果:研究设计:前测-后测对照组研究设计:我们招募了34名FS患者,并比较了为期12个疗程的MM和RPT的效果。结果测量指标包括肩胛骨运动学和肌肉激活、肩胛骨排列、肩关节活动范围和疼痛强度。采用双向方差分析来检验干预效果,α = 0.05:结果:两种方案对疼痛和肩部功能的改善效果相似。与 RPT 相比,MM 增加了后倾(MM:7.04°-16.09°,RPT:-2.50°至-4.37°;p = 0.002;ES = 0.261),降低了斜方肌激活(MM:260.61%-470.90%,RPT:322.64%-313.33%;p = 0.033;ES = 0.134),并且在手到颈任务中后倾增加(MM:0.70°-15.16°,RPT:-9.66°至-6.44°;p = 0.007;ES = 0.205)。MM 组的 GH 后仰(MM:37.18°-42.79°,RPT:43.64°-40.83°;p = 0.004,ES = 0.237)和肩胛骨下旋(MM:-2.48°至 6.80°,RPT:-1.93°-1.44°)也有所增加:MM:-2.48°至 6.80°,RPT:1.93°至 1.44°;P在肩胛骨神经肌肉表现方面,MM优于RPT。临床医生在治疗 FS 时应考虑增加以肌肉为基础的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of muscle-biased manual therapy on shoulder kinematics, muscle performance, functional impairment, and pain in patients with frozen shoulder.

Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is characterized by restricted active and passive shoulder mobility and pain.

Purpose: Compare the effect of muscle-biased manual therapy (MM) and regular physical therapy (RPT) in patients with FS.

Study design: Pretest-post-test control group study design.

Methods: We recruited 34 patients with FS and compared the effect of 12-session MM and RPT. The outcome measures were scapular kinematics and muscle activation, scapular alignment, shoulder range of motion, and pain intensity. Two-way analysis of variance was used to examine the intervention effect with α = 0.05.

Results: Both programs resulted in similar improvements in pain and shoulder function. Compared to the RPT, MM resulted in increased posterior tilt (MM: 7.04°-16.09°, RPT: -2.50° to -4.37°; p = 0.002; ES = 0.261) and lower trapezius activation (MM: 260.61%-470.90%, RPT: 322.64%-313.33%; p = 0.033; ES = 0.134) during scaption, and increased posterior tilt (MM: 0.70°-15.16°, RPT: -9.66° to -6.44°; p = 0.007; ES = 0.205) during the hand-to-neck task. The MM group also showed increased GH backward elevation (MM: 37.18°-42.79°, RPT: 43.64°-40.83°; p = 0.004, ES = 0.237) and scapular downward rotation (MM: -2.48° to 6.80°, RPT: 1.93°-1.44°; p < 0.001; ES = 0.404) during the thumb-to-waist task, enhanced shoulder abduction (MM: 84.6°-102.3°, RPT: 85.1°-92.9°; p = 0.02; ES = 0.153), and improved scapular alignment (MM: 10.4-9.65 cm, RPT: 9.41-9.56 cm; p = 0.02; ES = 0.114).

Conclusions: MM was superior to the RPT regarding scapular neuromuscular performance. Clinicians should consider adding muscle-biased treatment when treating FS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信