德克萨斯州转移性黑色素瘤患者生存结果的差异:免疫检查点抑制剂时代的政策和干预措施的意义》(Implications for Policy and Interventions in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors)。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Olajumoke A Olateju, Osaro Mgbere, J Douglas Thornton, Zhen Zeng, Ekere J Essien
{"title":"德克萨斯州转移性黑色素瘤患者生存结果的差异:免疫检查点抑制剂时代的政策和干预措施的意义》(Implications for Policy and Interventions in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors)。","authors":"Olajumoke A Olateju, Osaro Mgbere, J Douglas Thornton, Zhen Zeng, Ekere J Essien","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disparities exist in the length and quality of survival from melanoma. This study evaluated, in a Texas cohort, patient factors associated with melanoma survival and examined if newer immune-oncologic agents extend survival compared with conventional therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma from 2011 to 2018 in the Texas Cancer Registry database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The patient cohort was then grouped based on receipt of first-line immunotherapy or other therapies. The association between receipt of immunotherapy and survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and inverse probability treatment weighted Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1372 patients with metastatic melanoma. Factors associated with increased melanoma mortality risk (CSS) included being male (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), non-Hispanic black (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13-1.45), living in poorer counties (HR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.20-1.64), and having multimorbidity (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.74). All minority races and Hispanics had poorer OS compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Patients who received first-line immunotherapy had significantly longer median (interquartile range) survival (CSS: 27.00 [21.00 to 42.00] mo vs. 16.00 [14.00 to 19.00] mo; OS: 22.00 [17.00 to 27.00] mo vs. 12.00 [11.00 to 14.00] mo). They also had reduced mortality risk (HR for CSS: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P <0.0001; HR for OS: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.83; P <0.0001) compared with the nonimmunotherapy cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed differences in risks from melanoma survival based on patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Low socioeconomic status increased mortality risk, and first-line immunotherapy use favored survival. Health policies and tailored interventions that will promote equity in patient survival and survivorship are essential for managing metastatic melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"517-525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Melanoma in Texas: Implications for Policy and Interventions in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Olajumoke A Olateju, Osaro Mgbere, J Douglas Thornton, Zhen Zeng, Ekere J Essien\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COC.0000000000001128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disparities exist in the length and quality of survival from melanoma. This study evaluated, in a Texas cohort, patient factors associated with melanoma survival and examined if newer immune-oncologic agents extend survival compared with conventional therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma from 2011 to 2018 in the Texas Cancer Registry database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The patient cohort was then grouped based on receipt of first-line immunotherapy or other therapies. The association between receipt of immunotherapy and survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and inverse probability treatment weighted Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1372 patients with metastatic melanoma. Factors associated with increased melanoma mortality risk (CSS) included being male (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), non-Hispanic black (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13-1.45), living in poorer counties (HR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.20-1.64), and having multimorbidity (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.74). All minority races and Hispanics had poorer OS compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Patients who received first-line immunotherapy had significantly longer median (interquartile range) survival (CSS: 27.00 [21.00 to 42.00] mo vs. 16.00 [14.00 to 19.00] mo; OS: 22.00 [17.00 to 27.00] mo vs. 12.00 [11.00 to 14.00] mo). They also had reduced mortality risk (HR for CSS: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P <0.0001; HR for OS: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.83; P <0.0001) compared with the nonimmunotherapy cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed differences in risks from melanoma survival based on patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Low socioeconomic status increased mortality risk, and first-line immunotherapy use favored survival. Health policies and tailored interventions that will promote equity in patient survival and survivorship are essential for managing metastatic melanoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"517-525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:黑色素瘤患者的生存期和生存质量存在差异。本研究在德克萨斯州队列中评估了与黑色素瘤生存相关的患者因素,并考察了与传统疗法相比,新型免疫肿瘤药物是否能延长患者的生存期:对德克萨斯州癌症登记数据库中2011年至2018年确诊的转移性黑色素瘤患者进行回顾性分析。采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归评估与癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)相关的患者特征。然后根据接受一线免疫疗法或其他疗法的情况对患者队列进行分组。采用卡普兰-梅耶分析法和逆概率治疗加权考克斯回归法评估接受免疫疗法与生存率之间的关系:结果:共有1372名转移性黑色素瘤患者。与黑色素瘤死亡风险(CSS)增加相关的因素包括男性(HR:1.13,95% CI:1.02-1.26)、非西班牙裔黑人(HR:1.28,95% CI:1.13-1.45)、居住在贫困县(HR:1.40,95% CI:1.20-1.64)和多病(HR:1.35,95% CI:1.05-1.74)。与非西班牙裔白人相比,所有少数种族和西班牙裔的OS都较差。接受一线免疫疗法的患者的中位生存期(四分位数间距)明显更长(CSS:27.00 [21.00 至 42.00] 个月 vs. 16.00 [14.00 至 19.00] 个月;OS:22.00 [17.00 至 27.00] 个月 vs. 12.00 [11.00 至 14.00] 个月)。他们的死亡风险也有所降低(CSS 的 HR:0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; PConclusions:这项研究表明,根据患者的人口统计学和临床特征,黑色素瘤患者的生存风险存在差异。社会经济地位低会增加死亡风险,而使用一线免疫疗法则有利于生存。医疗政策和有针对性的干预措施将促进患者生存和存活的公平性,这对转移性黑色素瘤的管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Melanoma in Texas: Implications for Policy and Interventions in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Objectives: Disparities exist in the length and quality of survival from melanoma. This study evaluated, in a Texas cohort, patient factors associated with melanoma survival and examined if newer immune-oncologic agents extend survival compared with conventional therapies.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma from 2011 to 2018 in the Texas Cancer Registry database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The patient cohort was then grouped based on receipt of first-line immunotherapy or other therapies. The association between receipt of immunotherapy and survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and inverse probability treatment weighted Cox regression.

Results: There were 1372 patients with metastatic melanoma. Factors associated with increased melanoma mortality risk (CSS) included being male (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), non-Hispanic black (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13-1.45), living in poorer counties (HR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.20-1.64), and having multimorbidity (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.74). All minority races and Hispanics had poorer OS compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Patients who received first-line immunotherapy had significantly longer median (interquartile range) survival (CSS: 27.00 [21.00 to 42.00] mo vs. 16.00 [14.00 to 19.00] mo; OS: 22.00 [17.00 to 27.00] mo vs. 12.00 [11.00 to 14.00] mo). They also had reduced mortality risk (HR for CSS: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P <0.0001; HR for OS: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.83; P <0.0001) compared with the nonimmunotherapy cohort.

Conclusions: This study showed differences in risks from melanoma survival based on patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Low socioeconomic status increased mortality risk, and first-line immunotherapy use favored survival. Health policies and tailored interventions that will promote equity in patient survival and survivorship are essential for managing metastatic melanoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信