腰椎间盘退变与腰背痛的关系因潜在的疼痛遗传倾向而改变。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018
Pradeep Suri, Maryam Kazemi Naeini, Patrick J Heagerty, Maxim B Freidin, Isabelle Granville Smith, Elizaveta E Elgaeva, Roger Compte, Yakov A Tsepilov, Frances M K Williams
{"title":"腰椎间盘退变与腰背痛的关系因潜在的疼痛遗传倾向而改变。","authors":"Pradeep Suri, Maryam Kazemi Naeini, Patrick J Heagerty, Maxim B Freidin, Isabelle Granville Smith, Elizaveta E Elgaeva, Roger Compte, Yakov A Tsepilov, Frances M K Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Associations between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and LBP are often of modest magnitude. This association may be larger in specific patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether the association between LDD and LBP is modified by underlying genetic predispositions to pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study in UK Biobank (UKB) and Twins UK.</p><p><strong>Patient samples: </strong>A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the number of anatomical chronic pain locations was conducted in 347,538 UKB participants. The GWAS was used to develop a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) in a holdout sample of 30,000 UKB participants. The PRS model was then used in analyses of 645 TwinsUK participants with standardized LDD MRI assessments.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Ever having had LBP associated with disability lasting ≥1 month (LBP1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PRS as a proxy for \"genetically-predicted propensity to pain\", we stratified TwinsUK participants into PRS quartiles. A \"basic\" model examined the association between an LDD summary score (LSUM) and LBP1, adjusting for covariates. A \"fully-adjusted\" model also adjusted for PRS quartile and LSUM x PRS quartile interaction terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the basic model, the odds ratio (OR) of LBP1 was 1.8 per standard deviation of LSUM (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.3). In the fully-adjusted model, there was a statistically significant LSUM-LBP1 association in quartile 4, the highest PRS quartile (OR=2.5 [95% CI 1.7-3.7], p=2.6×10<sup>-6</sup>), and in quartile 3 (OR=2.0, [95% CI 1.3-3.0]; p=.002), with small-magnitude and/or nonsignificant associations in the lowest 2 PRS quartiles. PRS quartile was a significant effect modifier of the LSUM-LBP1 association (interaction p≤.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetically-predicted propensity to pain modifies the LDD-LBP association, with the strongest association present in people with the highest genetic propensity to pain. Lumbar MRI findings may have stronger connections to LBP in specific subgroups of people.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"8-17"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration with low back pain is modified by underlying genetic propensity to pain.\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Suri, Maryam Kazemi Naeini, Patrick J Heagerty, Maxim B Freidin, Isabelle Granville Smith, Elizaveta E Elgaeva, Roger Compte, Yakov A Tsepilov, Frances M K Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Associations between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and LBP are often of modest magnitude. This association may be larger in specific patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether the association between LDD and LBP is modified by underlying genetic predispositions to pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study in UK Biobank (UKB) and Twins UK.</p><p><strong>Patient samples: </strong>A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the number of anatomical chronic pain locations was conducted in 347,538 UKB participants. The GWAS was used to develop a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) in a holdout sample of 30,000 UKB participants. The PRS model was then used in analyses of 645 TwinsUK participants with standardized LDD MRI assessments.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Ever having had LBP associated with disability lasting ≥1 month (LBP1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PRS as a proxy for \\\"genetically-predicted propensity to pain\\\", we stratified TwinsUK participants into PRS quartiles. A \\\"basic\\\" model examined the association between an LDD summary score (LSUM) and LBP1, adjusting for covariates. A \\\"fully-adjusted\\\" model also adjusted for PRS quartile and LSUM x PRS quartile interaction terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the basic model, the odds ratio (OR) of LBP1 was 1.8 per standard deviation of LSUM (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.3). In the fully-adjusted model, there was a statistically significant LSUM-LBP1 association in quartile 4, the highest PRS quartile (OR=2.5 [95% CI 1.7-3.7], p=2.6×10<sup>-6</sup>), and in quartile 3 (OR=2.0, [95% CI 1.3-3.0]; p=.002), with small-magnitude and/or nonsignificant associations in the lowest 2 PRS quartiles. PRS quartile was a significant effect modifier of the LSUM-LBP1 association (interaction p≤.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetically-predicted propensity to pain modifies the LDD-LBP association, with the strongest association present in people with the highest genetic propensity to pain. Lumbar MRI findings may have stronger connections to LBP in specific subgroups of people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景情况:磁共振成像(MRI)检测到的腰椎间盘退变(LDD)与枸杞痛之间的关联通常不大。目的:研究 LDD 与腰椎间盘突出症之间的关联是否会因潜在的疼痛遗传倾向而改变:研究设计:英国生物库(UKB)和英国双胞胎(TwinsUK)的横断面研究:对 347,538 名英国生物库参与者进行了解剖学慢性疼痛部位数量的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)。在 30,000 名英国广播公司参与者的保留样本中,利用全基因组关联研究制定了全基因组多基因风险评分 (PRS)。随后,PRS模型被用于对645名进行了标准化LDD MRI评估的TwinsUK参与者进行分析:结果测量:曾经患有与残疾持续时间≥1个月相关的腰椎间盘突出症(LBP1):我们使用PRS作为 "遗传预测疼痛倾向 "的替代指标,将英国双胞胎参加者按PRS四分位数进行分层。一个 "基本 "模型检验了 LDD 总分(LSUM)与 LBP1 之间的关联,并对协变量进行了调整。完全调整 "模型还对PRS四分位数和LSUM x PRS四分位数交互项进行了调整:在基本模型中,LBP1 的几率比(OR)为 LSUM 每标准差 1.8(95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.4 -2.3)。在完全调整模型中,PRS最高的四分位数即四分位数4(OR=2.5 [95% CI 1.7-3.7],p=2.6×10-6)和四分位数3(OR=2.0,[95% CI 1.3-3.0];p=0.002)的LSUM-LBP1相关性具有统计学意义,而PRS最低的两个四分位数的相关性较小和/或不显著。PRS四分位数是LSUM-LBP1关联的一个显著的效应调节因子(交互作用P≤0.05):结论:遗传预测的疼痛倾向会改变 LDD-LBP 关联,遗传疼痛倾向最高的人群关联性最强。腰椎核磁共振成像结果可能与特定亚组人群的枸杞痛有更紧密的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration with low back pain is modified by underlying genetic propensity to pain.

Background context: Associations between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and LBP are often of modest magnitude. This association may be larger in specific patient subgroups.

Purpose: To examine whether the association between LDD and LBP is modified by underlying genetic predispositions to pain.

Study design: Cross-sectional study in UK Biobank (UKB) and Twins UK.

Patient samples: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the number of anatomical chronic pain locations was conducted in 347,538 UKB participants. The GWAS was used to develop a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) in a holdout sample of 30,000 UKB participants. The PRS model was then used in analyses of 645 TwinsUK participants with standardized LDD MRI assessments.

Outcome measures: Ever having had LBP associated with disability lasting ≥1 month (LBP1).

Methods: Using the PRS as a proxy for "genetically-predicted propensity to pain", we stratified TwinsUK participants into PRS quartiles. A "basic" model examined the association between an LDD summary score (LSUM) and LBP1, adjusting for covariates. A "fully-adjusted" model also adjusted for PRS quartile and LSUM x PRS quartile interaction terms.

Results: In the basic model, the odds ratio (OR) of LBP1 was 1.8 per standard deviation of LSUM (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.3). In the fully-adjusted model, there was a statistically significant LSUM-LBP1 association in quartile 4, the highest PRS quartile (OR=2.5 [95% CI 1.7-3.7], p=2.6×10-6), and in quartile 3 (OR=2.0, [95% CI 1.3-3.0]; p=.002), with small-magnitude and/or nonsignificant associations in the lowest 2 PRS quartiles. PRS quartile was a significant effect modifier of the LSUM-LBP1 association (interaction p≤.05).

Conclusions: Genetically-predicted propensity to pain modifies the LDD-LBP association, with the strongest association present in people with the highest genetic propensity to pain. Lumbar MRI findings may have stronger connections to LBP in specific subgroups of people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信