经颅直流电刺激能否减轻休闲跑步者的中枢和外周肌肉疲劳?一项三盲、假对照、随机、交叉临床研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Laura Uehara , Daniel Boari Coelho , Abrahão Fontes Baptista , Lucas Santana , Rafael Jardim Duarte Moreira , Yossi Zana , Luciana Malosá , Taiane Lima , Gabriela Valentim , Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas , Felipe Fregni , João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa , Fernanda Ishida Corrêa
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激能否减轻休闲跑步者的中枢和外周肌肉疲劳?一项三盲、假对照、随机、交叉临床研究。","authors":"Laura Uehara ,&nbsp;Daniel Boari Coelho ,&nbsp;Abrahão Fontes Baptista ,&nbsp;Lucas Santana ,&nbsp;Rafael Jardim Duarte Moreira ,&nbsp;Yossi Zana ,&nbsp;Luciana Malosá ,&nbsp;Taiane Lima ,&nbsp;Gabriela Valentim ,&nbsp;Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas ,&nbsp;Felipe Fregni ,&nbsp;João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa ,&nbsp;Fernanda Ishida Corrêa","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Runners seek health benefits and performance improvement. However, fatigue might be considered a limiting factor. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated to improve performance and reduce fatigue in athletes. While some studies showing that tDCS may improve a variety of physical measures, other studies failed to show any benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the acute effects of tDCS on central and peripheral fatigue compared to a sham intervention in recreational runners.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a triple-blind, controlled, crossover study of 30 recreational runners who were randomized to receive one of the two interventions, anodal or sham tDCS, after the fatigue protocol. The interventions were applied to the quadriceps muscle hotspot for 20 min. Peak torque, motor-evoked potential, and perceived exertion rate were assessed before and after the interventions, and blood lactate level was assessed before, during, and after the interventions. A generalized estimated equation was used to analyze the peak torque, motor-evoked potential, and blood lactate data, and the Wilcoxon test was used for perceived exertion rate data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our findings showed no difference between anodal tDCS and sham tDCS on peak torque, motor-evoked potential, blood lactate, and perceived exertion rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The tDCS protocol was not effective in improving performance and reducing fatigue compared to a sham control intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry</h3><p>RBR-8zpnxz.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation reduce central and peripheral muscle fatigue in recreational runners? A triple-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, crossover clinical study\",\"authors\":\"Laura Uehara ,&nbsp;Daniel Boari Coelho ,&nbsp;Abrahão Fontes Baptista ,&nbsp;Lucas Santana ,&nbsp;Rafael Jardim Duarte Moreira ,&nbsp;Yossi Zana ,&nbsp;Luciana Malosá ,&nbsp;Taiane Lima ,&nbsp;Gabriela Valentim ,&nbsp;Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas ,&nbsp;Felipe Fregni ,&nbsp;João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa ,&nbsp;Fernanda Ishida Corrêa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Runners seek health benefits and performance improvement. However, fatigue might be considered a limiting factor. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated to improve performance and reduce fatigue in athletes. While some studies showing that tDCS may improve a variety of physical measures, other studies failed to show any benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the acute effects of tDCS on central and peripheral fatigue compared to a sham intervention in recreational runners.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a triple-blind, controlled, crossover study of 30 recreational runners who were randomized to receive one of the two interventions, anodal or sham tDCS, after the fatigue protocol. The interventions were applied to the quadriceps muscle hotspot for 20 min. Peak torque, motor-evoked potential, and perceived exertion rate were assessed before and after the interventions, and blood lactate level was assessed before, during, and after the interventions. A generalized estimated equation was used to analyze the peak torque, motor-evoked potential, and blood lactate data, and the Wilcoxon test was used for perceived exertion rate data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our findings showed no difference between anodal tDCS and sham tDCS on peak torque, motor-evoked potential, blood lactate, and perceived exertion rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The tDCS protocol was not effective in improving performance and reducing fatigue compared to a sham control intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry</h3><p>RBR-8zpnxz.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524004982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524004982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跑步者追求健康和提高成绩。然而,疲劳可能被认为是一个限制因素。经颅直流电刺激(transcranial Direct Current Stimulation,tDCS)已被研究用于提高运动员的成绩和减少疲劳。虽然一些研究显示经颅直流电刺激可改善各种体能指标,但其他研究却未显示出任何益处:与假干预相比,评估 tDCS 对休闲跑步者中枢和外周疲劳的急性影响:这是一项三盲、对照、交叉研究,研究对象是 30 名休闲跑步者,他们在疲劳协议后被随机分配接受阳极或假 tDCS 两种干预中的一种。干预措施作用于股四头肌热点 20 分钟。在干预前后对峰值扭矩、运动诱发电位和感知用力率进行了评估,在干预前、干预期间和干预后对血乳酸水平进行了评估。使用广义估计方程分析峰值扭矩、运动诱发电位和血乳酸数据,使用 Wilcoxon 检验分析感知用力率数据:我们的研究结果表明,阳极 tDCS 与假 tDCS 对峰值扭矩、运动诱发电位、血乳酸和感知用力率没有影响:巴西临床试验登记处:RBR-8zpnxz。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation reduce central and peripheral muscle fatigue in recreational runners? A triple-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, crossover clinical study

Background

Runners seek health benefits and performance improvement. However, fatigue might be considered a limiting factor. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated to improve performance and reduce fatigue in athletes. While some studies showing that tDCS may improve a variety of physical measures, other studies failed to show any benefit.

Objective

To evaluate the acute effects of tDCS on central and peripheral fatigue compared to a sham intervention in recreational runners.

Methods

This is a triple-blind, controlled, crossover study of 30 recreational runners who were randomized to receive one of the two interventions, anodal or sham tDCS, after the fatigue protocol. The interventions were applied to the quadriceps muscle hotspot for 20 min. Peak torque, motor-evoked potential, and perceived exertion rate were assessed before and after the interventions, and blood lactate level was assessed before, during, and after the interventions. A generalized estimated equation was used to analyze the peak torque, motor-evoked potential, and blood lactate data, and the Wilcoxon test was used for perceived exertion rate data.

Results

Our findings showed no difference between anodal tDCS and sham tDCS on peak torque, motor-evoked potential, blood lactate, and perceived exertion rate.

Conclusion

The tDCS protocol was not effective in improving performance and reducing fatigue compared to a sham control intervention.

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry

RBR-8zpnxz.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信