南卡罗来纳州 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间剖宫产率的城乡和种族差异。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Cassie L. Odahowski , Peiyin Hung , Berry A. Campbell , Jihong Liu , Nansi S. Boghossian , Anirban Chatterjee , Yiwen Shih , Chelsea Norregaard , Bo Cai , Xiaoming Li
{"title":"南卡罗来纳州 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间剖宫产率的城乡和种族差异。","authors":"Cassie L. Odahowski ,&nbsp;Peiyin Hung ,&nbsp;Berry A. Campbell ,&nbsp;Jihong Liu ,&nbsp;Nansi S. Boghossian ,&nbsp;Anirban Chatterjee ,&nbsp;Yiwen Shih ,&nbsp;Chelsea Norregaard ,&nbsp;Bo Cai ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>Unnecessary cesarean delivery increases the risk of complications for birthing people and infants.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Examining the intersectionality of rural and racial disparities in low-risk cesarean delivery is necessary to improve equity in quality obstetrics care.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To evaluate rural and racial/ethnic differences in Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV) and primary cesarean delivery rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study used birth certificates linked to all-payer hospital discharge data for South Carolina childbirths from 2018 to 2021. Multilevel logistic regressions examined differences in cesarean outcomes by rural/urban hospital location and race/ethnicity of birthing people during pre-pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and peri-pandemic periods (March 2020–December 2021), adjusting for maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics among two low-risk pregnancy cohorts: 1) Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV, <em>n</em> = 65,974) and 2) those without prior cesarean (primary, <em>n</em> = 167,928).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Black vs. White disparities remained for NTSV cesarean in adjusted models (urban pre-pandemic aOR = 1.34, 95 %CI 1.23–1.46) but were not significantly different for primary cesarean, apart from rural settings peri-pandemic (aOR = 0.87, 95 %CI 0.79–0.96). Hispanic individuals had higher adjusted odds of NTSV cesarean only for rural settings pre-pandemic (aOR = 1.28, 95 %CI 1.05–1.56), but this disparity was not significant during the pandemic (aOR = 1.13, 95 %CI 0.93–1.37).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Observed rural and racial/ethnic disparities in cesarean delivery outcomes were present before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies effective in reducing racial disparities in primary cesarean may be useful in also reducing Black vs. White NTSV cesarean disparities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural-urban and racial differences in cesarean deliveries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina\",\"authors\":\"Cassie L. Odahowski ,&nbsp;Peiyin Hung ,&nbsp;Berry A. Campbell ,&nbsp;Jihong Liu ,&nbsp;Nansi S. Boghossian ,&nbsp;Anirban Chatterjee ,&nbsp;Yiwen Shih ,&nbsp;Chelsea Norregaard ,&nbsp;Bo Cai ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>Unnecessary cesarean delivery increases the risk of complications for birthing people and infants.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Examining the intersectionality of rural and racial disparities in low-risk cesarean delivery is necessary to improve equity in quality obstetrics care.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To evaluate rural and racial/ethnic differences in Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV) and primary cesarean delivery rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study used birth certificates linked to all-payer hospital discharge data for South Carolina childbirths from 2018 to 2021. Multilevel logistic regressions examined differences in cesarean outcomes by rural/urban hospital location and race/ethnicity of birthing people during pre-pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and peri-pandemic periods (March 2020–December 2021), adjusting for maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics among two low-risk pregnancy cohorts: 1) Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV, <em>n</em> = 65,974) and 2) those without prior cesarean (primary, <em>n</em> = 167,928).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Black vs. White disparities remained for NTSV cesarean in adjusted models (urban pre-pandemic aOR = 1.34, 95 %CI 1.23–1.46) but were not significantly different for primary cesarean, apart from rural settings peri-pandemic (aOR = 0.87, 95 %CI 0.79–0.96). Hispanic individuals had higher adjusted odds of NTSV cesarean only for rural settings pre-pandemic (aOR = 1.28, 95 %CI 1.05–1.56), but this disparity was not significant during the pandemic (aOR = 1.13, 95 %CI 0.93–1.37).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Observed rural and racial/ethnic disparities in cesarean delivery outcomes were present before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies effective in reducing racial disparities in primary cesarean may be useful in also reducing Black vs. White NTSV cesarean disparities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661382400158X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661382400158X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:不必要的剖宫产会增加分娩者和婴儿出现并发症的风险:目的:评估南卡罗来纳州COVID-19大流行之前和期间无子宫、足月、单胎、顶体(NTSV)和初次剖宫产率的农村和种族/族裔差异:这项回顾性队列研究使用的出生证明与南卡罗来纳州 2018 年至 2021 年所有付费者医院出院数据相关联。多层次逻辑回归研究了大流行前(2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月)和大流行期间(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月)按农村/城市医院地点和分娩者种族/民族划分的剖宫产结果差异,并对两个低风险妊娠队列中的产妇、婴儿和医院特征进行了调整:1) 无子宫、足月、单胎、顶点(NTSV,n = 65974)和 2) 无剖宫产史(primary,n = 167928):在调整后的模型中,黑人与白人在 NTSV 剖宫产方面仍存在差异(大流行前的城市 aOR = 1.34,95 %CI 1.23-1.46),但除了大流行前的农村环境(aOR = 0.87,95 %CI 0.79-0.96)外,在初次剖宫产方面没有显著差异。只有在大流行前的农村地区,西班牙裔的 NTSV 剖宫产调整后几率更高(aOR = 1.28,95 %CI 1.05-1.56),但在大流行期间,这一差异并不显著(aOR = 1.13,95 %CI 0.93-1.37):讨论与结论:在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间,在剖宫产结果方面观察到的农村和种族/民族差异是存在的。减少初次剖宫产种族差异的有效策略可能也有助于减少黑人与白人 NTSV 剖宫产的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rural-urban and racial differences in cesarean deliveries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina

Problem

Unnecessary cesarean delivery increases the risk of complications for birthing people and infants.

Background

Examining the intersectionality of rural and racial disparities in low-risk cesarean delivery is necessary to improve equity in quality obstetrics care.

Aim

To evaluate rural and racial/ethnic differences in Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV) and primary cesarean delivery rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used birth certificates linked to all-payer hospital discharge data for South Carolina childbirths from 2018 to 2021. Multilevel logistic regressions examined differences in cesarean outcomes by rural/urban hospital location and race/ethnicity of birthing people during pre-pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and peri-pandemic periods (March 2020–December 2021), adjusting for maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics among two low-risk pregnancy cohorts: 1) Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV, n = 65,974) and 2) those without prior cesarean (primary, n = 167,928).

Findings

Black vs. White disparities remained for NTSV cesarean in adjusted models (urban pre-pandemic aOR = 1.34, 95 %CI 1.23–1.46) but were not significantly different for primary cesarean, apart from rural settings peri-pandemic (aOR = 0.87, 95 %CI 0.79–0.96). Hispanic individuals had higher adjusted odds of NTSV cesarean only for rural settings pre-pandemic (aOR = 1.28, 95 %CI 1.05–1.56), but this disparity was not significant during the pandemic (aOR = 1.13, 95 %CI 0.93–1.37).

Discussion and conclusion

Observed rural and racial/ethnic disparities in cesarean delivery outcomes were present before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies effective in reducing racial disparities in primary cesarean may be useful in also reducing Black vs. White NTSV cesarean disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信