复发性和转移性头颈部粘膜鳞状细胞癌试验终点定义评估:头颈癌国际小组共识建议。

IF 41.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Annette M Lim, Christophe Le Tourneau, Chris Hurt, Sarbani G Laskar, Conor E Steuer, Velda L Y Chow, Petr Szturz, Christina Henson, Andrew T Day, James E Bates, Smaro Lazarakis, Lachlan McDowell, Hisham Mehanna, Sue S Yom
{"title":"复发性和转移性头颈部粘膜鳞状细胞癌试验终点定义评估:头颈癌国际小组共识建议。","authors":"Annette M Lim, Christophe Le Tourneau, Chris Hurt, Sarbani G Laskar, Conor E Steuer, Velda L Y Chow, Petr Szturz, Christina Henson, Andrew T Day, James E Bates, Smaro Lazarakis, Lachlan McDowell, Hisham Mehanna, Sue S Yom","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00068-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transparent and precise endpoint definitions are a crucial aspect of clinical trial conduct and reporting, and are used to communicate the benefit of an intervention. Previous studies have identified inconsistencies in endpoint definitions across oncological clinical trials. Here, the Head and Neck Cancer International Group assessed endpoint definitions from phase 3 trials or trials considered practice-changing for patients with recurrent or metastatic mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, published between 2008 and 2021. We identify considerable and global heterogeneity in endpoint definitions, which undermines the interpretation of results and development of future studies. We show how fundamental components of even incontrovertible endpoints such as overall survival vary widely, highlighting an urgent need for increased rigour in reporting and harmonisation of endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":17942,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":41.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of endpoint definitions in recurrent and metastatic mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma trials: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Annette M Lim, Christophe Le Tourneau, Chris Hurt, Sarbani G Laskar, Conor E Steuer, Velda L Y Chow, Petr Szturz, Christina Henson, Andrew T Day, James E Bates, Smaro Lazarakis, Lachlan McDowell, Hisham Mehanna, Sue S Yom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00068-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transparent and precise endpoint definitions are a crucial aspect of clinical trial conduct and reporting, and are used to communicate the benefit of an intervention. Previous studies have identified inconsistencies in endpoint definitions across oncological clinical trials. Here, the Head and Neck Cancer International Group assessed endpoint definitions from phase 3 trials or trials considered practice-changing for patients with recurrent or metastatic mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, published between 2008 and 2021. We identify considerable and global heterogeneity in endpoint definitions, which undermines the interpretation of results and development of future studies. We show how fundamental components of even incontrovertible endpoints such as overall survival vary widely, highlighting an urgent need for increased rigour in reporting and harmonisation of endpoints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":41.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00068-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00068-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

透明、准确的终点定义是临床试验实施和报告的一个重要方面,用于传达干预措施的益处。以往的研究发现,肿瘤临床试验的终点定义并不一致。在此,头颈癌国际小组评估了2008年至2021年间发表的针对复发性或转移性头颈部粘膜鳞状细胞癌患者的3期试验或被认为改变实践的试验的终点定义。我们发现终点定义存在相当大的全球性异质性,这影响了对结果的解读和未来研究的发展。我们展示了即使是总生存期等无可争议的终点,其基本组成部分也存在很大差异,这凸显了加强报告严谨性和统一终点的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of endpoint definitions in recurrent and metastatic mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma trials: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations.

Transparent and precise endpoint definitions are a crucial aspect of clinical trial conduct and reporting, and are used to communicate the benefit of an intervention. Previous studies have identified inconsistencies in endpoint definitions across oncological clinical trials. Here, the Head and Neck Cancer International Group assessed endpoint definitions from phase 3 trials or trials considered practice-changing for patients with recurrent or metastatic mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, published between 2008 and 2021. We identify considerable and global heterogeneity in endpoint definitions, which undermines the interpretation of results and development of future studies. We show how fundamental components of even incontrovertible endpoints such as overall survival vary widely, highlighting an urgent need for increased rigour in reporting and harmonisation of endpoints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Oncology
Lancet Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
62.10
自引率
1.00%
发文量
913
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Oncology is a trusted international journal that addresses various topics in clinical practice, health policy, and global oncology. It covers a wide range of cancer types, including breast, endocrine system, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynaecological, haematological, head and neck, neurooncology, paediatric, thoracic, sarcoma, and skin cancers. Additionally, it includes articles on epidemiology, cancer prevention and control, supportive care, imaging, and health-care systems. The journal has an Impact Factor of 51.1, making it the leading clinical oncology research journal worldwide. It publishes different types of articles, such as Articles, Reviews, Policy Reviews, Personal Views, Clinical Pictures, Comments, Correspondence, News, and Perspectives. The Lancet Oncology also collaborates with societies, governments, NGOs, and academic centers to publish Series and Commissions that aim to drive positive changes in clinical practice and health policy in areas of global oncology that require attention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信