在初级医疗保健中实施新的合作和参与形式:利用过去的经验为未来的举措提供信息。

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Lesley Middleton, Claire O'Loughlin, Tim Tenbensel, Pushkar Silwal, Marianna Churchward, Lynne Russell, Jacqueline Cumming
{"title":"在初级医疗保健中实施新的合作和参与形式:利用过去的经验为未来的举措提供信息。","authors":"Lesley Middleton, Claire O'Loughlin, Tim Tenbensel, Pushkar Silwal, Marianna Churchward, Lynne Russell, Jacqueline Cumming","doi":"10.1071/HC24026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Within primary health care policy, there is an increasing focus on enhancing involvement with secondary health care, social care services and communities. Yet, translating these expectations into tangible changes frequently encounters significant obstacles. As part of an investigation into the progress made in achieving primary health care reform in Aotearoa New Zealand, realist research was undertaken with those charged with responsibility for national and local policies. The specific analysis in this paper probes primary health care leaders' assessments of progress towards more collaboration with other health and non-health agencies, and communities. Aim This study aimed to investigate how ideas for more integration and joinedup care have found their way into the practice of primary health care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Methods Applying a realist logic of inquiry, data from semi-structured interviews with primary health care leaders were analysed to identify key contextual characteristics and mechanisms. Explanations were developed of what influenced leaders to invest energy in joined-up and integrated care activities. Results Our findings highlight three explanatory mechanisms and their associated contexts: a willingness to share power, build trusting relationships and manage task complexity. These underpin leaders' accounts of the success (or otherwise) of collaborative arrangements. Discussion Such insights have import in the context of the current health reforms for stakeholders charged with developing local approaches to the planning and delivery of health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"16 2","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing new forms of collaboration and participation in primary health care: leveraging past learnings to inform future initiatives.\",\"authors\":\"Lesley Middleton, Claire O'Loughlin, Tim Tenbensel, Pushkar Silwal, Marianna Churchward, Lynne Russell, Jacqueline Cumming\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HC24026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Within primary health care policy, there is an increasing focus on enhancing involvement with secondary health care, social care services and communities. Yet, translating these expectations into tangible changes frequently encounters significant obstacles. As part of an investigation into the progress made in achieving primary health care reform in Aotearoa New Zealand, realist research was undertaken with those charged with responsibility for national and local policies. The specific analysis in this paper probes primary health care leaders' assessments of progress towards more collaboration with other health and non-health agencies, and communities. Aim This study aimed to investigate how ideas for more integration and joinedup care have found their way into the practice of primary health care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Methods Applying a realist logic of inquiry, data from semi-structured interviews with primary health care leaders were analysed to identify key contextual characteristics and mechanisms. Explanations were developed of what influenced leaders to invest energy in joined-up and integrated care activities. Results Our findings highlight three explanatory mechanisms and their associated contexts: a willingness to share power, build trusting relationships and manage task complexity. These underpin leaders' accounts of the success (or otherwise) of collaborative arrangements. Discussion Such insights have import in the context of the current health reforms for stakeholders charged with developing local approaches to the planning and delivery of health services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of primary health care\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"198-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of primary health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 在初级医疗保健政策中,人们越来越重视加强与二级医疗保健、社会医疗保健服务和社区的合作。然而,要将这些期望转化为切实的变化,往往会遇到巨大的障碍。作为对新西兰奥特亚罗瓦初级医疗改革进展情况调查的一部分,我们对那些负责国家和地方政策的人员进行了现实主义研究。本文的具体分析探究了初级医疗保健领导者对与其他医疗保健和非医疗保健机构以及社区开展更多合作的进展情况的评估。研究目的 本研究旨在调查新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区的初级医疗保健实践中是如何实现更多整合和联合护理的。方法 采用现实主义的调查逻辑,对来自初级医疗保健领导者的半结构式访谈数据进行分析,以确定关键的背景特征和机制。对影响领导者在联合和综合医疗活动中投入精力的因素进行了解释。结果 我们的研究结果强调了三种解释机制及其相关背景:分享权力的意愿、建立相互信任的关系和管理任务的复杂性。这些都是领导者说明合作安排成功与否的基础。讨论 在当前医疗改革的背景下,这些见解对负责制定当地医疗服务规划和提供方法的利益相关者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing new forms of collaboration and participation in primary health care: leveraging past learnings to inform future initiatives.

Introduction Within primary health care policy, there is an increasing focus on enhancing involvement with secondary health care, social care services and communities. Yet, translating these expectations into tangible changes frequently encounters significant obstacles. As part of an investigation into the progress made in achieving primary health care reform in Aotearoa New Zealand, realist research was undertaken with those charged with responsibility for national and local policies. The specific analysis in this paper probes primary health care leaders' assessments of progress towards more collaboration with other health and non-health agencies, and communities. Aim This study aimed to investigate how ideas for more integration and joinedup care have found their way into the practice of primary health care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Methods Applying a realist logic of inquiry, data from semi-structured interviews with primary health care leaders were analysed to identify key contextual characteristics and mechanisms. Explanations were developed of what influenced leaders to invest energy in joined-up and integrated care activities. Results Our findings highlight three explanatory mechanisms and their associated contexts: a willingness to share power, build trusting relationships and manage task complexity. These underpin leaders' accounts of the success (or otherwise) of collaborative arrangements. Discussion Such insights have import in the context of the current health reforms for stakeholders charged with developing local approaches to the planning and delivery of health services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信