肾脏异体移植急性排斥反应的通用尿细胞基因特征。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Thalia Salinas , Carol Li , Catherine Snopkowski , Vijay K. Sharma , Darshana M. Dadhania , Karsten Suhre , Thangamani Muthukumar , Manikkam Suthanthiran
{"title":"肾脏异体移植急性排斥反应的通用尿细胞基因特征。","authors":"Thalia Salinas ,&nbsp;Carol Li ,&nbsp;Catherine Snopkowski ,&nbsp;Vijay K. Sharma ,&nbsp;Darshana M. Dadhania ,&nbsp;Karsten Suhre ,&nbsp;Thangamani Muthukumar ,&nbsp;Manikkam Suthanthiran","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Acute rejection (AR) undermines the life-extending benefits of kidney transplantation and is diagnosed using the invasive biopsy procedure. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (Mixed Rejection [MR]) are the three major types of AR. Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of AR due to any of the three types is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy numbers in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients. We determined whether the urinary cell three-gene signature diagnostic of TCMR (<span>Suthanthiran et al., 2013</span>) discriminates patients with no rejection biopsies (NR, <em>n</em> = 50) from those with ABMR (<em>n</em> = 28) or MR (<em>n</em> = 20) biopsies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated all three types of rejection biopsies from NR biopsies (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). All three rejection categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature score discriminates AR due to TCMR, ABMR or MR from NR biopsies in human kidney allograft recipients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"532 ","pages":"Article 113714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A universal urinary cell gene signature of acute rejection in kidney allografts\",\"authors\":\"Thalia Salinas ,&nbsp;Carol Li ,&nbsp;Catherine Snopkowski ,&nbsp;Vijay K. Sharma ,&nbsp;Darshana M. Dadhania ,&nbsp;Karsten Suhre ,&nbsp;Thangamani Muthukumar ,&nbsp;Manikkam Suthanthiran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Acute rejection (AR) undermines the life-extending benefits of kidney transplantation and is diagnosed using the invasive biopsy procedure. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (Mixed Rejection [MR]) are the three major types of AR. Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of AR due to any of the three types is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy numbers in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients. We determined whether the urinary cell three-gene signature diagnostic of TCMR (<span>Suthanthiran et al., 2013</span>) discriminates patients with no rejection biopsies (NR, <em>n</em> = 50) from those with ABMR (<em>n</em> = 28) or MR (<em>n</em> = 20) biopsies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated all three types of rejection biopsies from NR biopsies (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). All three rejection categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature score discriminates AR due to TCMR, ABMR or MR from NR biopsies in human kidney allograft recipients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of immunological methods\",\"volume\":\"532 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of immunological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924000991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924000991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:急性排斥反应(AR)有损肾移植延长生命的益处,可通过侵入性活检程序进行诊断。T细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR)、抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)或同时发生的TCMR+ABMR(混合排斥反应[MR])是AR的三种主要类型。开发诊断这三种类型中任何一种 AR 的无创生物标记物是对诊断手段的有益补充:方法:我们开发了定制的 RT-qPCR 检测方法,并测量了来自 126 名肾脏异体移植受者的 145 份活检匹配尿液样本中的尿细胞 mRNA 拷贝数。我们确定了诊断 TCMR 的尿细胞三基因特征(Suthanthiran 等人,2013 年)是否能区分无排斥活检患者(NR,n = 50)与 ABMR(n = 28)或 MR(n = 20)活检患者:结果:尿液细胞三基因特征可将所有三种类型的排斥活检与NR活检区分开来(P 0.05):结论:尿液细胞三基因特征得分可区分人肾移植受者因TCMR、ABMR或MR引起的AR与NR活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A universal urinary cell gene signature of acute rejection in kidney allografts

Introduction

Acute rejection (AR) undermines the life-extending benefits of kidney transplantation and is diagnosed using the invasive biopsy procedure. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (Mixed Rejection [MR]) are the three major types of AR. Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of AR due to any of the three types is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.

Methods

We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy numbers in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients. We determined whether the urinary cell three-gene signature diagnostic of TCMR (Suthanthiran et al., 2013) discriminates patients with no rejection biopsies (NR, n = 50) from those with ABMR (n = 28) or MR (n = 20) biopsies.

Results

The urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated all three types of rejection biopsies from NR biopsies (P < 0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded P < 0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; P < 0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and P < 0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (P < 0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (P < 0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (P < 0.0001). All three rejection categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The urinary cell three-gene signature score discriminates AR due to TCMR, ABMR or MR from NR biopsies in human kidney allograft recipients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信