Thalia Salinas , Carol Li , Catherine Snopkowski , Vijay K. Sharma , Darshana M. Dadhania , Karsten Suhre , Thangamani Muthukumar , Manikkam Suthanthiran
{"title":"肾脏异体移植急性排斥反应的通用尿细胞基因特征。","authors":"Thalia Salinas , Carol Li , Catherine Snopkowski , Vijay K. Sharma , Darshana M. Dadhania , Karsten Suhre , Thangamani Muthukumar , Manikkam Suthanthiran","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Acute rejection (AR) undermines the life-extending benefits of kidney transplantation and is diagnosed using the invasive biopsy procedure. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (Mixed Rejection [MR]) are the three major types of AR. Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of AR due to any of the three types is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy numbers in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients. We determined whether the urinary cell three-gene signature diagnostic of TCMR (<span>Suthanthiran et al., 2013</span>) discriminates patients with no rejection biopsies (NR, <em>n</em> = 50) from those with ABMR (<em>n</em> = 28) or MR (<em>n</em> = 20) biopsies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated all three types of rejection biopsies from NR biopsies (<em>P</em> < 0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded <em>P</em> < 0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; <em>P</em> < 0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and <em>P</em> < 0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (<em>P</em> < 0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (<em>P</em> < 0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). All three rejection categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons <em>P</em> > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature score discriminates AR due to TCMR, ABMR or MR from NR biopsies in human kidney allograft recipients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"532 ","pages":"Article 113714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A universal urinary cell gene signature of acute rejection in kidney allografts\",\"authors\":\"Thalia Salinas , Carol Li , Catherine Snopkowski , Vijay K. Sharma , Darshana M. Dadhania , Karsten Suhre , Thangamani Muthukumar , Manikkam Suthanthiran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Acute rejection (AR) undermines the life-extending benefits of kidney transplantation and is diagnosed using the invasive biopsy procedure. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (Mixed Rejection [MR]) are the three major types of AR. Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of AR due to any of the three types is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy numbers in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients. We determined whether the urinary cell three-gene signature diagnostic of TCMR (<span>Suthanthiran et al., 2013</span>) discriminates patients with no rejection biopsies (NR, <em>n</em> = 50) from those with ABMR (<em>n</em> = 28) or MR (<em>n</em> = 20) biopsies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated all three types of rejection biopsies from NR biopsies (<em>P</em> < 0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded <em>P</em> < 0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; <em>P</em> < 0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and <em>P</em> < 0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (<em>P</em> < 0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (<em>P</em> < 0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). All three rejection categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons <em>P</em> > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The urinary cell three-gene signature score discriminates AR due to TCMR, ABMR or MR from NR biopsies in human kidney allograft recipients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of immunological methods\",\"volume\":\"532 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of immunological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924000991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924000991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A universal urinary cell gene signature of acute rejection in kidney allografts
Introduction
Acute rejection (AR) undermines the life-extending benefits of kidney transplantation and is diagnosed using the invasive biopsy procedure. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (Mixed Rejection [MR]) are the three major types of AR. Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of AR due to any of the three types is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.
Methods
We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy numbers in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients. We determined whether the urinary cell three-gene signature diagnostic of TCMR (Suthanthiran et al., 2013) discriminates patients with no rejection biopsies (NR, n = 50) from those with ABMR (n = 28) or MR (n = 20) biopsies.
Results
The urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated all three types of rejection biopsies from NR biopsies (P < 0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded P < 0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; P < 0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and P < 0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (P < 0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (P < 0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (P < 0.0001). All three rejection categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons P > 0.05).
Conclusion
The urinary cell three-gene signature score discriminates AR due to TCMR, ABMR or MR from NR biopsies in human kidney allograft recipients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.
In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.