对以患者为导向的研究网络的知识转化计划进行现实主义过程评估。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sakiko Yamaguchi, Alix Zerbo, Roberta Cardoso, Mayada Elsabbagh, Aryeh Gitterman, Stephanie Glegg, Miriam Gonzalez, Connie Putterman, Jonathan A Weiss, Keiko Shikako
{"title":"对以患者为导向的研究网络的知识转化计划进行现实主义过程评估。","authors":"Sakiko Yamaguchi, Alix Zerbo, Roberta Cardoso, Mayada Elsabbagh, Aryeh Gitterman, Stephanie Glegg, Miriam Gonzalez, Connie Putterman, Jonathan A Weiss, Keiko Shikako","doi":"10.1111/jep.14056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The Knowledge Translation (KT) Programme of a pan-Canadian strategic patient-oriented research network focused on brain-based developmental disabilities aimed to mobilize knowledge relevant to the network members. The programme also promotes and studies integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approaches involving different interested parties, such as researchers, patient-partners and decision-makers, in all parts of the knowledge creation process.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to advance research programme evaluation methods through a realist evaluation of the process of implementing iKT activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Realist process evaluation included: (1) development of initial programme theories (using the partnership synergy theory); (2) data collection and analysis; (3) synthesis and refinement of theories through engagement with literature; and (4) presentation of findings in context-mechanism-outcome (C-M-O) configurations. A range of project documentation records were reviewed for analysis, and three co-leads, a programme coordinator, and a senior research associate were consulted to contextualize the implementation process of relevant KT activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the developed C-M-O configurations, we identified five key mechanisms of generating synergy in the iKT processes: (1) Visible shared leadership that embodies what iKT looks like; (2) Researchers' readiness for iKT; (3) Adaptation and flexible allocation of resources to emerging needs; (4) Power sharing to create practical and creative knowledge; and (5) Collective voice for potential transformative impacts at the policy level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current realist evaluation demonstrated how partnerships between researchers, patient-partners and other interested parties can synergistically generate new ways of thinking among all interested parties, actionable strategies to integrate users in research, and solutions to disseminate knowledge. In particular, we identified a pivotal role for patient-partners to act as equal decision-maker helps building and maintaining partnerships and consolidating KT strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realist process evaluation of the knowledge translation programme of a patient-oriented research network.\",\"authors\":\"Sakiko Yamaguchi, Alix Zerbo, Roberta Cardoso, Mayada Elsabbagh, Aryeh Gitterman, Stephanie Glegg, Miriam Gonzalez, Connie Putterman, Jonathan A Weiss, Keiko Shikako\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The Knowledge Translation (KT) Programme of a pan-Canadian strategic patient-oriented research network focused on brain-based developmental disabilities aimed to mobilize knowledge relevant to the network members. The programme also promotes and studies integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approaches involving different interested parties, such as researchers, patient-partners and decision-makers, in all parts of the knowledge creation process.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to advance research programme evaluation methods through a realist evaluation of the process of implementing iKT activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Realist process evaluation included: (1) development of initial programme theories (using the partnership synergy theory); (2) data collection and analysis; (3) synthesis and refinement of theories through engagement with literature; and (4) presentation of findings in context-mechanism-outcome (C-M-O) configurations. A range of project documentation records were reviewed for analysis, and three co-leads, a programme coordinator, and a senior research associate were consulted to contextualize the implementation process of relevant KT activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the developed C-M-O configurations, we identified five key mechanisms of generating synergy in the iKT processes: (1) Visible shared leadership that embodies what iKT looks like; (2) Researchers' readiness for iKT; (3) Adaptation and flexible allocation of resources to emerging needs; (4) Power sharing to create practical and creative knowledge; and (5) Collective voice for potential transformative impacts at the policy level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current realist evaluation demonstrated how partnerships between researchers, patient-partners and other interested parties can synergistically generate new ways of thinking among all interested parties, actionable strategies to integrate users in research, and solutions to disseminate knowledge. In particular, we identified a pivotal role for patient-partners to act as equal decision-maker helps building and maintaining partnerships and consolidating KT strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:泛加拿大以患者为导向的战略研究网络的知识转化(KT)计划侧重于脑发育障碍,旨在调动与网络成员相关的知识。该计划还推广和研究综合知识转化(iKT)方法,让研究人员、患者合作伙伴和决策者等不同利益方参与知识创造过程的各个环节:本研究的目的是通过对 iKT 活动的实施过程进行现实主义评估,推进研究计划评估方法的发展:现实主义过程评估包括(方法:现实主义过程评估包括:(1) 发展初步的计划理论(使用伙伴关系协同作用理论);(2) 数据收集和分析;(3) 通过参考文献对理论进行综合和完善;(4) 以背景--机制--结果(C-M-O)组合的方式介绍评估结果。为进行分析,审查了一系列项目文件记录,并咨询了三位共同领导、一位计划协调员和一位高级研究助理,以了解相关知识、技术和创新活动的实施过程:根据开发的 C-M-O 配置,我们确定了在 iKT 过程中产生协同作用的五个关键机制:(1) 体现 iKT 的明显共同领导;(2) 研究人员为 iKT 做好准备;(3) 根据新出现的需求调整和灵活分配资源;(4) 分享权力,创造实用和创造性的知识;(5) 在政策层面为潜在的变革性影响集体发声:当前的现实主义评估表明,研究人员、患者合作伙伴和其他相关方之间的伙伴关系如何能够协同产生所有相关方的新思维方式、将用户纳入研究的可行战略以及传播知识的解决方案。特别是,我们发现患者伙伴作为平等的决策者在帮助建立和维护伙伴关系以及巩固知识、态度和价值观战略方面发挥着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realist process evaluation of the knowledge translation programme of a patient-oriented research network.

Rationale: The Knowledge Translation (KT) Programme of a pan-Canadian strategic patient-oriented research network focused on brain-based developmental disabilities aimed to mobilize knowledge relevant to the network members. The programme also promotes and studies integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approaches involving different interested parties, such as researchers, patient-partners and decision-makers, in all parts of the knowledge creation process.

Aims and objectives: The objective of this study is to advance research programme evaluation methods through a realist evaluation of the process of implementing iKT activities.

Methods: Realist process evaluation included: (1) development of initial programme theories (using the partnership synergy theory); (2) data collection and analysis; (3) synthesis and refinement of theories through engagement with literature; and (4) presentation of findings in context-mechanism-outcome (C-M-O) configurations. A range of project documentation records were reviewed for analysis, and three co-leads, a programme coordinator, and a senior research associate were consulted to contextualize the implementation process of relevant KT activities.

Results: Based on the developed C-M-O configurations, we identified five key mechanisms of generating synergy in the iKT processes: (1) Visible shared leadership that embodies what iKT looks like; (2) Researchers' readiness for iKT; (3) Adaptation and flexible allocation of resources to emerging needs; (4) Power sharing to create practical and creative knowledge; and (5) Collective voice for potential transformative impacts at the policy level.

Conclusions: The current realist evaluation demonstrated how partnerships between researchers, patient-partners and other interested parties can synergistically generate new ways of thinking among all interested parties, actionable strategies to integrate users in research, and solutions to disseminate knowledge. In particular, we identified a pivotal role for patient-partners to act as equal decision-maker helps building and maintaining partnerships and consolidating KT strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信