Alexandre Henrique dos Reis-Prado, Caroline Andrade Maia, Gabriel Pereira Nunes, Lara Cancella de Arantes, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Henry F. Duncan, Marco C. Bottino, Francine Benetti
{"title":"2019-2023 年牙髓再生学领域被引用次数最多的 100 篇科学文章:文献计量学分析。","authors":"Alexandre Henrique dos Reis-Prado, Caroline Andrade Maia, Gabriel Pereira Nunes, Lara Cancella de Arantes, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Henry F. Duncan, Marco C. Bottino, Francine Benetti","doi":"10.1111/iej.14117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Bibliometric analysis is a critical indicator of the influence and relevance of scientific papers, whilst also highlighting key contributors and gaps in knowledge in a scientific field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To update and analyse the 100 most-cited papers in regenerative endodontics from 2019 to 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A search of the most-cited recent papers focusing on regenerative endodontics using journals included in the category, ‘Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine’, in the Clarivate Web of Science database from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Three researchers conducted the study selection and data extraction. Data extraction included publication title and year, authors, number and mean number of citations, institution, country and continent, study design, journal title, keywords and research topic. Citation counts were also collected in Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Graphical bibliometric networks were created using VOSviewer software.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The number of citations of the 100 most-cited articles ranged from 6 to 85. Most were published in 2020 (<i>n</i> = 48), principally in the <i>Journal of Endodontics</i> (47%), followed by <i>International Endodontic Journal</i> (13%), <i>Journal of Dental Research</i> (6%) and <i>Dental Materials</i> (6%). Laboratory study was the most common study design amongst the included papers (<i>n</i> = 47), followed by narrative reviews (<i>n</i> = 17) and observational studies (<i>n</i> = 16). The most frequent first author on the top three most-cited papers was Hacer Aksel, whilst Adham A. Azim (<i>n</i> = 6; 89 citations) contributed most to the top 100 articles. The institution from which most articles originated was the University of Hong Kong (China) (<i>n</i> = 5; 81 citations), whereas the corresponding authors were predominantly from the United States of America (USA) (<i>n</i> = 31; 560 citations). The VOSviewer map of co-authorship demonstrated research collaborative clusters. ‘Regenerative endodontics’ and ‘stem-cells’ were the most employed keywords (37 and 36 occurrences respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The current study was designed not only to showcase the most influential papers in regenerative endodontics since 2019 but also to provide a better understanding of global research in this area over the last five years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This bibliometric analysis highlighted papers, authors, institutions and keywords in regenerative endodontics. The 100 most-cited papers primarily consisted of laboratory studies published in the USA, focusing on evaluating biomaterials and scaffold design strategies in contact with stem cells. Clinical studies and systematic reviews representing higher levels of scientific evidence are currently not the most influential in the regenerative endodontic field.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iej.14117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Top 100 most-cited scientific articles in regenerative endodontics 2019–2023: A bibliometric analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Henrique dos Reis-Prado, Caroline Andrade Maia, Gabriel Pereira Nunes, Lara Cancella de Arantes, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Henry F. Duncan, Marco C. Bottino, Francine Benetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iej.14117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bibliometric analysis is a critical indicator of the influence and relevance of scientific papers, whilst also highlighting key contributors and gaps in knowledge in a scientific field.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To update and analyse the 100 most-cited papers in regenerative endodontics from 2019 to 2023.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A search of the most-cited recent papers focusing on regenerative endodontics using journals included in the category, ‘Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine’, in the Clarivate Web of Science database from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Three researchers conducted the study selection and data extraction. Data extraction included publication title and year, authors, number and mean number of citations, institution, country and continent, study design, journal title, keywords and research topic. Citation counts were also collected in Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Graphical bibliometric networks were created using VOSviewer software.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The number of citations of the 100 most-cited articles ranged from 6 to 85. Most were published in 2020 (<i>n</i> = 48), principally in the <i>Journal of Endodontics</i> (47%), followed by <i>International Endodontic Journal</i> (13%), <i>Journal of Dental Research</i> (6%) and <i>Dental Materials</i> (6%). Laboratory study was the most common study design amongst the included papers (<i>n</i> = 47), followed by narrative reviews (<i>n</i> = 17) and observational studies (<i>n</i> = 16). The most frequent first author on the top three most-cited papers was Hacer Aksel, whilst Adham A. Azim (<i>n</i> = 6; 89 citations) contributed most to the top 100 articles. The institution from which most articles originated was the University of Hong Kong (China) (<i>n</i> = 5; 81 citations), whereas the corresponding authors were predominantly from the United States of America (USA) (<i>n</i> = 31; 560 citations). The VOSviewer map of co-authorship demonstrated research collaborative clusters. ‘Regenerative endodontics’ and ‘stem-cells’ were the most employed keywords (37 and 36 occurrences respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The current study was designed not only to showcase the most influential papers in regenerative endodontics since 2019 but also to provide a better understanding of global research in this area over the last five years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This bibliometric analysis highlighted papers, authors, institutions and keywords in regenerative endodontics. The 100 most-cited papers primarily consisted of laboratory studies published in the USA, focusing on evaluating biomaterials and scaffold design strategies in contact with stem cells. Clinical studies and systematic reviews representing higher levels of scientific evidence are currently not the most influential in the regenerative endodontic field.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iej.14117\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14117\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Top 100 most-cited scientific articles in regenerative endodontics 2019–2023: A bibliometric analysis
Background
Bibliometric analysis is a critical indicator of the influence and relevance of scientific papers, whilst also highlighting key contributors and gaps in knowledge in a scientific field.
Objectives
To update and analyse the 100 most-cited papers in regenerative endodontics from 2019 to 2023.
Methods
A search of the most-cited recent papers focusing on regenerative endodontics using journals included in the category, ‘Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine’, in the Clarivate Web of Science database from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Three researchers conducted the study selection and data extraction. Data extraction included publication title and year, authors, number and mean number of citations, institution, country and continent, study design, journal title, keywords and research topic. Citation counts were also collected in Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Graphical bibliometric networks were created using VOSviewer software.
Results
The number of citations of the 100 most-cited articles ranged from 6 to 85. Most were published in 2020 (n = 48), principally in the Journal of Endodontics (47%), followed by International Endodontic Journal (13%), Journal of Dental Research (6%) and Dental Materials (6%). Laboratory study was the most common study design amongst the included papers (n = 47), followed by narrative reviews (n = 17) and observational studies (n = 16). The most frequent first author on the top three most-cited papers was Hacer Aksel, whilst Adham A. Azim (n = 6; 89 citations) contributed most to the top 100 articles. The institution from which most articles originated was the University of Hong Kong (China) (n = 5; 81 citations), whereas the corresponding authors were predominantly from the United States of America (USA) (n = 31; 560 citations). The VOSviewer map of co-authorship demonstrated research collaborative clusters. ‘Regenerative endodontics’ and ‘stem-cells’ were the most employed keywords (37 and 36 occurrences respectively).
Discussion
The current study was designed not only to showcase the most influential papers in regenerative endodontics since 2019 but also to provide a better understanding of global research in this area over the last five years.
Conclusions
This bibliometric analysis highlighted papers, authors, institutions and keywords in regenerative endodontics. The 100 most-cited papers primarily consisted of laboratory studies published in the USA, focusing on evaluating biomaterials and scaffold design strategies in contact with stem cells. Clinical studies and systematic reviews representing higher levels of scientific evidence are currently not the most influential in the regenerative endodontic field.
期刊介绍:
The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted.
The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.