[popi 工具的共识更新]。

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Wala Ammor, Christele Gras Le Guen, François Angoulvant, Sonia Prot-Labarthe
{"title":"[popi 工具的共识更新]。","authors":"Wala Ammor, Christele Gras Le Guen, François Angoulvant, Sonia Prot-Labarthe","doi":"10.1016/j.pharma.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medication errors are one of the causes of iatrogenic medication use in children. The POPI tool for detecting inappropriate drug prescriptions and prescription omissions in paediatrics was the first tool to be published in this field in 2014. Our aim was to update the POPI tool for French use based on current recommendations and practice. Criteria were removed, updated or added based on recommendations from learned societies and national bodies. The two-round Delphi method was used to reach a consensus of experts. The level of agreement of the healthcare professionals' proposals was rated on a 9-point Likert scale. In the first round, only proposals with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and an agreement of more than 65% were retained. In the second round, only those with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and over 75% agreement were retained. The POPI tool now includes eight categories (various, infectiology, gastroenterology, pneumonology, dermatology, neurology/pedopsychiatry, haematology and excipients). All the criteria were supported by bibliographical references. They were submitted to 20 French healthcare professionals: 9 pharmacists and 11 doctors (17 hospital-based and 3 self-employed). After two rounds of Delphi testing, 166 criteria were retained and validated (111 inappropriate prescriptions and 55 omissions). In conclusion, this study made it possible to update the POPI tool, which is still available for assessing paediatric prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8332,"journal":{"name":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Consensus update of the POPI tool].\",\"authors\":\"Wala Ammor, Christele Gras Le Guen, François Angoulvant, Sonia Prot-Labarthe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pharma.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medication errors are one of the causes of iatrogenic medication use in children. The POPI tool for detecting inappropriate drug prescriptions and prescription omissions in paediatrics was the first tool to be published in this field in 2014. Our aim was to update the POPI tool for French use based on current recommendations and practice. Criteria were removed, updated or added based on recommendations from learned societies and national bodies. The two-round Delphi method was used to reach a consensus of experts. The level of agreement of the healthcare professionals' proposals was rated on a 9-point Likert scale. In the first round, only proposals with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and an agreement of more than 65% were retained. In the second round, only those with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and over 75% agreement were retained. The POPI tool now includes eight categories (various, infectiology, gastroenterology, pneumonology, dermatology, neurology/pedopsychiatry, haematology and excipients). All the criteria were supported by bibliographical references. They were submitted to 20 French healthcare professionals: 9 pharmacists and 11 doctors (17 hospital-based and 3 self-employed). After two rounds of Delphi testing, 166 criteria were retained and validated (111 inappropriate prescriptions and 55 omissions). In conclusion, this study made it possible to update the POPI tool, which is still available for assessing paediatric prescriptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2024.06.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2024.06.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用药错误是儿童先天性用药的原因之一。用于检测儿科不当用药处方和处方遗漏的 POPI 工具是该领域于 2014 年发布的首个工具。我们的目的是根据当前的建议和实践,更新 POPI 工具,供法国使用。根据学术团体和国家机构的建议,我们删除、更新或增加了一些标准。为了达成专家共识,我们采用了两轮德尔菲法。医护专业人员对建议的同意程度采用 9 分制的李克特量表进行评分。在第一轮中,只有同意度中位数为 7 至 9 且同意度超过 65% 的建议才会被采纳。在第二轮中,只有同意度中位数为 7 至 9 且同意度超过 75% 的建议书才被保留。POPI 工具目前包括八个类别(各种、感染学、肠胃病学、肺病学、皮肤病学、神经病学/儿 童精神病学、血液病学和辅料)。所有标准均有参考文献支持。这些标准提交给了 20 位法国医疗保健专业人士:其中包括 9 名药剂师和 11 名医生(17 名医院医生和 3 名个体医生)。经过两轮德尔菲测试,166 项标准得到保留和验证(111 项不当处方和 54 项遗漏)。总之,这项研究使 POPI 工具得以更新,该工具仍可用于评估儿科处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Consensus update of the POPI tool].

Medication errors are one of the causes of iatrogenic medication use in children. The POPI tool for detecting inappropriate drug prescriptions and prescription omissions in paediatrics was the first tool to be published in this field in 2014. Our aim was to update the POPI tool for French use based on current recommendations and practice. Criteria were removed, updated or added based on recommendations from learned societies and national bodies. The two-round Delphi method was used to reach a consensus of experts. The level of agreement of the healthcare professionals' proposals was rated on a 9-point Likert scale. In the first round, only proposals with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and an agreement of more than 65% were retained. In the second round, only those with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and over 75% agreement were retained. The POPI tool now includes eight categories (various, infectiology, gastroenterology, pneumonology, dermatology, neurology/pedopsychiatry, haematology and excipients). All the criteria were supported by bibliographical references. They were submitted to 20 French healthcare professionals: 9 pharmacists and 11 doctors (17 hospital-based and 3 self-employed). After two rounds of Delphi testing, 166 criteria were retained and validated (111 inappropriate prescriptions and 55 omissions). In conclusion, this study made it possible to update the POPI tool, which is still available for assessing paediatric prescriptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: This journal proposes a scientific information validated and indexed to be informed about the last research works in all the domains interesting the pharmacy. The original works, general reviews, the focusing, the brief notes, subjected by the best academics and the professionals, propose a synthetic approach of the last progress accomplished in the concerned sectors. The thematic Sessions and the – life of the Academy – resume the communications which, presented in front of the national Academy of pharmacy, are in the heart of the current events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信