测量日常生活中的情绪失调：经验取样研究。

IF 2.3 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2024.2366031

Nicole H Weiss, Katherine L Dixon-Gordon, Leslie A Brick, Silvi C Goldstein, Melissa R Schick, Holly Laws, Reina Kiefer, Ateka A Contractor, Tami P Sullivan

{"title":"测量日常生活中的情绪失调：经验取样研究。","authors":"Nicole H Weiss, Katherine L Dixon-Gordon, Leslie A Brick, Silvi C Goldstein, Melissa R Schick, Holly Laws, Reina Kiefer, Ateka A Contractor, Tami P Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2024.2366031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Literature underscores the importance of emotion dysregulation in clinical research. However, one critical limitation of the existing investigations in this area involves the lack of psychometrically valid measures for assessing emotion dysregulation in individuals' daily lives. This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of momentary versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (mDERS) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Positive (mDERS-P).Methods: Participants were 145 community women (M age = 40.66, 40.7% white) experiencing intimate partner violence and using substances who participated in a baseline interview and then completed surveys three times a day for 30 days.Results: Analyses supported the reliability of the mDERS and the mDERS-P. The two-state, two-trait model, with separate factors for negative and positive emotion dysregulation at both the within-and between-levels, fit the data best. Momentary negative, but not positive, emotions were positively related to the mDERS; both momentary negative and positive emotions were positively related to the mDERS-P. Baseline trait negative, but not positive, emotion dysregulation, was related to greater variability in momentary negative and positive emotion dysregulation.Conclusion: Findings advance our understanding and measurement of emotion dysregulation using intensive longitudinal approaches.","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring emotion dysregulation in daily life: an experience sampling study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole H Weiss, Katherine L Dixon-Gordon, Leslie A Brick, Silvi C Goldstein, Melissa R Schick, Holly Laws, Reina Kiefer, Ateka A Contractor, Tami P Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2024.2366031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Literature underscores the importance of emotion dysregulation in clinical research. However, one critical limitation of the existing investigations in this area involves the lack of psychometrically valid measures for assessing emotion dysregulation in individuals' daily lives. This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of momentary versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (mDERS) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Positive (mDERS-P).Methods: Participants were 145 community women (M age = 40.66, 40.7% white) experiencing intimate partner violence and using substances who participated in a baseline interview and then completed surveys three times a day for 30 days.Results: Analyses supported the reliability of the mDERS and the mDERS-P. The two-state, two-trait model, with separate factors for negative and positive emotion dysregulation at both the within-and between-levels, fit the data best. Momentary negative, but not positive, emotions were positively related to the mDERS; both momentary negative and positive emotions were positively related to the mDERS-P. Baseline trait negative, but not positive, emotion dysregulation, was related to greater variability in momentary negative and positive emotion dysregulation.Conclusion: Findings advance our understanding and measurement of emotion dysregulation using intensive longitudinal approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2366031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2366031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：文献强调了情绪失调在临床研究中的重要性。然而，该领域现有研究的一个重要局限是缺乏心理计量学上有效的测量方法来评估个人日常生活中的情绪失调。本研究考察了瞬间版情绪调节困难量表（mDERS）和情绪调节困难量表-阳性（mDERS-P）的因子结构和心理测量特性：参与者为 145 名遭受亲密伴侣暴力并使用药物的社区妇女（中位年龄 = 40.66 岁，40.7% 为白人），她们参加了基线访谈，然后在 30 天内每天完成三次调查：分析支持 mDERS 和 mDERS-P 的可靠性。双状态、双特质模型最适合数据，该模型在内部和不同水平上分别包含消极和积极情绪失调因子。瞬间的消极情绪（而非积极情绪）与 mDERS 呈正相关；瞬间的消极情绪和积极情绪均与 mDERS-P 呈正相关。基线特质消极情绪（而非积极情绪）失调与瞬间消极情绪和积极情绪失调的变异性有关：研究结果推进了我们对情绪失调的理解，并利用密集的纵向方法对情绪失调进行了测量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Measuring emotion dysregulation in daily life: an experience sampling study.

Background: Literature underscores the importance of emotion dysregulation in clinical research. However, one critical limitation of the existing investigations in this area involves the lack of psychometrically valid measures for assessing emotion dysregulation in individuals' daily lives. This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of momentary versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (mDERS) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Positive (mDERS-P).

Methods: Participants were 145 community women (M age = 40.66, 40.7% white) experiencing intimate partner violence and using substances who participated in a baseline interview and then completed surveys three times a day for 30 days.

Results: Analyses supported the reliability of the mDERS and the mDERS-P. The two-state, two-trait model, with separate factors for negative and positive emotion dysregulation at both the within-and between-levels, fit the data best. Momentary negative, but not positive, emotions were positively related to the mDERS; both momentary negative and positive emotions were positively related to the mDERS-P. Baseline trait negative, but not positive, emotion dysregulation, was related to greater variability in momentary negative and positive emotion dysregulation.

Conclusion: Findings advance our understanding and measurement of emotion dysregulation using intensive longitudinal approaches.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Anxiety Stress and Coping Multiple-

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.