{"title":"小学教育中组合评估的有效性:多元互补的研究方法。","authors":"Yunus Doğan , Nazife Tuğba Yıldırım , Veli Batdı","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current study represents a comprehensive exploration of the efficacy of portfolio assessment within primary school contexts, employing a Multi-Complementary Research (McA) framework comprising three distinct stages. In the pre-complementary knowledge stage, data collection commenced utilizing the document analysis method, concurrently conducting meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis. From 18 studies, a meta-analysis of 23 datasets revealed a medium-level overall effect size. Simultaneously, meta-thematic analysis was conducted on 6 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, analyzing themes and codes through content analysis. Transitioning to the post-complementary knowledge stage, an experimental study employing a pretest-posttest control group design was undertaken with third-grade primary school students. Additionally, thematic analysis based on participant perspectives was conducted. Subsequently, an eventual complementary knowledge stage was achieved by synthesizing findings from the initial two stages. Key themes emerged, titled \"the effect of portfolio use in primary education on academic success, 21st century skills, and attitudes.\" The collective findings indicate that portfolio assessment in primary schools yields positive effects across all three identified themes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of portfolio assessment in primary education: A multi-complementary research approach\",\"authors\":\"Yunus Doğan , Nazife Tuğba Yıldırım , Veli Batdı\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The current study represents a comprehensive exploration of the efficacy of portfolio assessment within primary school contexts, employing a Multi-Complementary Research (McA) framework comprising three distinct stages. In the pre-complementary knowledge stage, data collection commenced utilizing the document analysis method, concurrently conducting meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis. From 18 studies, a meta-analysis of 23 datasets revealed a medium-level overall effect size. Simultaneously, meta-thematic analysis was conducted on 6 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, analyzing themes and codes through content analysis. Transitioning to the post-complementary knowledge stage, an experimental study employing a pretest-posttest control group design was undertaken with third-grade primary school students. Additionally, thematic analysis based on participant perspectives was conducted. Subsequently, an eventual complementary knowledge stage was achieved by synthesizing findings from the initial two stages. Key themes emerged, titled \\\"the effect of portfolio use in primary education on academic success, 21st century skills, and attitudes.\\\" The collective findings indicate that portfolio assessment in primary schools yields positive effects across all three identified themes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000636\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of portfolio assessment in primary education: A multi-complementary research approach
The current study represents a comprehensive exploration of the efficacy of portfolio assessment within primary school contexts, employing a Multi-Complementary Research (McA) framework comprising three distinct stages. In the pre-complementary knowledge stage, data collection commenced utilizing the document analysis method, concurrently conducting meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis. From 18 studies, a meta-analysis of 23 datasets revealed a medium-level overall effect size. Simultaneously, meta-thematic analysis was conducted on 6 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, analyzing themes and codes through content analysis. Transitioning to the post-complementary knowledge stage, an experimental study employing a pretest-posttest control group design was undertaken with third-grade primary school students. Additionally, thematic analysis based on participant perspectives was conducted. Subsequently, an eventual complementary knowledge stage was achieved by synthesizing findings from the initial two stages. Key themes emerged, titled "the effect of portfolio use in primary education on academic success, 21st century skills, and attitudes." The collective findings indicate that portfolio assessment in primary schools yields positive effects across all three identified themes.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.