Ibrahim Kayode Suleiman, Olutayo James, Hector Oladapo Olasoji
{"title":"地塞米松、酮洛芬和冷敷对影响下第三磨牙手术后生活质量的影响比较:随机临床试验。","authors":"Ibrahim Kayode Suleiman, Olutayo James, Hector Oladapo Olasoji","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01268-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the effect of dexamethasone, ketoprofen and cold compress on the quality of life (QoL) following surgical removal of impacted lower third molars (ILTMs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eligible patients requiring ILTM extraction with a modified Pederson difficulty index score of 5-6 were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated into Groups A, B and C. Groups A and C received 100 mg of ketoprofen and 8 mg of dexamethasone per-oral respectively, preoperatively. Subjects in group B applied a pre-standardized ice pack over the angle of the mandible for 6 h postoperatively. The QoL questionnaire was administered on postoperative days 1, 2 and 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, seventy-eight subjects completed the study: 46 (59%) were male and had a mean age of 27.8 ± 4.9 years. The groups were similar sociodemographically. The overall QoL and appearance domain score were significantly better in patients on oral dexamethasone on postoperative day 1 than in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral dexamethasone demonstrates better improvement in postoperative QoL and appearance on day 1 following ILTM surgery compared to ice packs and ketoprofen. Although ice packs are readily available, can be used repeatedly and are a low-cost option, more research is necessary to determine their optimum therapeutic use in outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Oral dexamethasone is superior to ice pack compress and ketoprofen in improving the postoperative QoL in ILTM surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registry registration number: </strong>PACTR202005593102009 at Pan African Clinical Trial Registry.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effect of dexamethasone, ketoprofen and cold compress on postoperative quality of life following impacted lower third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Kayode Suleiman, Olutayo James, Hector Oladapo Olasoji\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-024-01268-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the effect of dexamethasone, ketoprofen and cold compress on the quality of life (QoL) following surgical removal of impacted lower third molars (ILTMs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eligible patients requiring ILTM extraction with a modified Pederson difficulty index score of 5-6 were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated into Groups A, B and C. Groups A and C received 100 mg of ketoprofen and 8 mg of dexamethasone per-oral respectively, preoperatively. Subjects in group B applied a pre-standardized ice pack over the angle of the mandible for 6 h postoperatively. The QoL questionnaire was administered on postoperative days 1, 2 and 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, seventy-eight subjects completed the study: 46 (59%) were male and had a mean age of 27.8 ± 4.9 years. The groups were similar sociodemographically. The overall QoL and appearance domain score were significantly better in patients on oral dexamethasone on postoperative day 1 than in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral dexamethasone demonstrates better improvement in postoperative QoL and appearance on day 1 following ILTM surgery compared to ice packs and ketoprofen. Although ice packs are readily available, can be used repeatedly and are a low-cost option, more research is necessary to determine their optimum therapeutic use in outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Oral dexamethasone is superior to ice pack compress and ketoprofen in improving the postoperative QoL in ILTM surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registry registration number: </strong>PACTR202005593102009 at Pan African Clinical Trial Registry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01268-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01268-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估并比较地塞米松、酮洛芬和冷敷对手术拔除下第三磨牙(ILTM)后生活质量(QoL)的影响:招募需要拔除下第三磨牙(ILTM)且改良 Pederson 难度指数为 5-6 分的合格患者。A 组和 C 组患者术前分别口服 100 毫克酮洛芬和 8 毫克地塞米松。B 组受试者术后在下颌角上敷上预先标准化的冰袋 6 小时。在术后第 1、2 和 7 天进行了 QoL 问卷调查:共有 78 名受试者完成了研究:46人(59%)为男性,平均年龄为(27.8 ± 4.9)岁。两组受试者的社会人口统计学特征相似。口服地塞米松的患者在术后第1天的总体QoL和外观领域得分明显优于其他组别:结论:与冰袋和酮洛芬相比,口服地塞米松能更好地改善 ILTM 术后第 1 天的 QoL 和外观。虽然冰袋很容易获得,可以反复使用,而且成本较低,但仍有必要开展更多研究,以确定冰袋在门诊环境中的最佳治疗效果:口服地塞米松在改善 ILTM 手术的术后 QoL 方面优于冰袋热敷和酮洛芬:泛非临床试验注册中心PACTR202005593102009。
Comparison of the effect of dexamethasone, ketoprofen and cold compress on postoperative quality of life following impacted lower third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effect of dexamethasone, ketoprofen and cold compress on the quality of life (QoL) following surgical removal of impacted lower third molars (ILTMs).
Materials and methods: Eligible patients requiring ILTM extraction with a modified Pederson difficulty index score of 5-6 were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated into Groups A, B and C. Groups A and C received 100 mg of ketoprofen and 8 mg of dexamethasone per-oral respectively, preoperatively. Subjects in group B applied a pre-standardized ice pack over the angle of the mandible for 6 h postoperatively. The QoL questionnaire was administered on postoperative days 1, 2 and 7.
Results: In total, seventy-eight subjects completed the study: 46 (59%) were male and had a mean age of 27.8 ± 4.9 years. The groups were similar sociodemographically. The overall QoL and appearance domain score were significantly better in patients on oral dexamethasone on postoperative day 1 than in the other groups.
Conclusions: Oral dexamethasone demonstrates better improvement in postoperative QoL and appearance on day 1 following ILTM surgery compared to ice packs and ketoprofen. Although ice packs are readily available, can be used repeatedly and are a low-cost option, more research is necessary to determine their optimum therapeutic use in outpatient settings.
Clinical relevance: Oral dexamethasone is superior to ice pack compress and ketoprofen in improving the postoperative QoL in ILTM surgery.
Trial registry registration number: PACTR202005593102009 at Pan African Clinical Trial Registry.
期刊介绍:
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).