用 136 例边缘性和恶性蝶形花瘤病例验证新提出的恶性蝶形花瘤细化诊断标准。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Surgical Pathology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000002264
Xiaoxian Li, Thi Truc Anh Nguyen, Jilun Zhang, Anupma Nayak, Yi Liu, Lauren A Duckworth, Gloria Zhang, Rania Bakkar, Indu Agarwal, Yanjun Hou, Hua Guo, Xiao Huang, Shi Wei, Sayeeda Yasmeen, Thaer Khoury, Huifeng Huang, Huina Zhang, Geoffrey Hughes Smith, Gulisa Turashvili, Limin Peng, Yueping Liu, Wentao Yang, Kalliopi P Siziopikou
{"title":"用 136 例边缘性和恶性蝶形花瘤病例验证新提出的恶性蝶形花瘤细化诊断标准。","authors":"Xiaoxian Li, Thi Truc Anh Nguyen, Jilun Zhang, Anupma Nayak, Yi Liu, Lauren A Duckworth, Gloria Zhang, Rania Bakkar, Indu Agarwal, Yanjun Hou, Hua Guo, Xiao Huang, Shi Wei, Sayeeda Yasmeen, Thaer Khoury, Huifeng Huang, Huina Zhang, Geoffrey Hughes Smith, Gulisa Turashvili, Limin Peng, Yueping Liu, Wentao Yang, Kalliopi P Siziopikou","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for malignant phyllodes tumor (MPT) may miss a significant number of MPTs with metastatic potential. New refined diagnostic criteria (Refined Criteria) for MPT were recently proposed. The aim of this study is to validate the Refined Criteria. This validation study included 136 borderline (borderline phyllodes tumor [BoPT]) and MPT cases that were not included in the initial study. We evaluated tumor classifications based on both the Refined Criteria and the WHO criteria. The Refined Criteria defines MPT when these criteria are met (1) stromal overgrowth with ≥ 1 feature(s) of marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, or ≥10 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (10 mitoses/10 HPFs) or (2) marked stromal cellularity with ≥1 feature(s) of marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs or permeative border. The WHO criteria require all 5 morphologic features (stromal overgrowth, permeative border, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, and ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs) for an MPT diagnosis. Using the Refined Criteria, none of the 61 BoPTs developed metastasis and 40.0% of the 75 MPTs developed metastases; local recurrence was seen in 11.5% BoPTs and 25.3% MPTs. Using the WHO criteria, 9.6% of the 94 BoPTs developed metastases and 50.0% of the 42 MPTs developed metastases; 14.9% of the BoPTs had local recurrence and 28.6% of the MPTs had local recurrence. Nine (30.0%) of the 30 tumors that developed distant metastases were diagnosed as BoPTs by the WHO criteria. When we combined the 75 MPTs from this validation cohort with the 65 MPT cases from the published data using the Refined Criteria, 50 (35.7%) of the 140 MPTs developed metastases, whereas 8 cases with metastases were <5 cm. In the univariate analysis with log-rank test, stromal overgrowth, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs, presence of heterologous components other than liposarcomatous component, and presence of stromal necrosis were significantly associated with the risk of metastasis (all with P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard regression, stromal overgrowth and marked stromal cellularity were significantly associated with metastasis (both with P < 0.001). The Refined Criteria are superior to the WHO criteria in predicting the clinical outcomes of BoPTs and MPTs. Using the Refined Criteria, 35.7% of 140 patients with MPT developed metastases, whereas none (0%) of the patients with BoPT developed metastases. Patients with MPT have a high metastatic rate; these patients may benefit from systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapies. In contrast, patients with BoPT may be managed with complete local excision alone without chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7772,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1146-1153"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation Study of the Newly Proposed Refined Diagnostic Criteria for Malignant Phyllodes Tumor With 136 Borderline and Malignant Phyllodes Tumor Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxian Li, Thi Truc Anh Nguyen, Jilun Zhang, Anupma Nayak, Yi Liu, Lauren A Duckworth, Gloria Zhang, Rania Bakkar, Indu Agarwal, Yanjun Hou, Hua Guo, Xiao Huang, Shi Wei, Sayeeda Yasmeen, Thaer Khoury, Huifeng Huang, Huina Zhang, Geoffrey Hughes Smith, Gulisa Turashvili, Limin Peng, Yueping Liu, Wentao Yang, Kalliopi P Siziopikou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for malignant phyllodes tumor (MPT) may miss a significant number of MPTs with metastatic potential. New refined diagnostic criteria (Refined Criteria) for MPT were recently proposed. The aim of this study is to validate the Refined Criteria. This validation study included 136 borderline (borderline phyllodes tumor [BoPT]) and MPT cases that were not included in the initial study. We evaluated tumor classifications based on both the Refined Criteria and the WHO criteria. The Refined Criteria defines MPT when these criteria are met (1) stromal overgrowth with ≥ 1 feature(s) of marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, or ≥10 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (10 mitoses/10 HPFs) or (2) marked stromal cellularity with ≥1 feature(s) of marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs or permeative border. The WHO criteria require all 5 morphologic features (stromal overgrowth, permeative border, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, and ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs) for an MPT diagnosis. Using the Refined Criteria, none of the 61 BoPTs developed metastasis and 40.0% of the 75 MPTs developed metastases; local recurrence was seen in 11.5% BoPTs and 25.3% MPTs. Using the WHO criteria, 9.6% of the 94 BoPTs developed metastases and 50.0% of the 42 MPTs developed metastases; 14.9% of the BoPTs had local recurrence and 28.6% of the MPTs had local recurrence. Nine (30.0%) of the 30 tumors that developed distant metastases were diagnosed as BoPTs by the WHO criteria. When we combined the 75 MPTs from this validation cohort with the 65 MPT cases from the published data using the Refined Criteria, 50 (35.7%) of the 140 MPTs developed metastases, whereas 8 cases with metastases were <5 cm. In the univariate analysis with log-rank test, stromal overgrowth, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs, presence of heterologous components other than liposarcomatous component, and presence of stromal necrosis were significantly associated with the risk of metastasis (all with P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard regression, stromal overgrowth and marked stromal cellularity were significantly associated with metastasis (both with P < 0.001). The Refined Criteria are superior to the WHO criteria in predicting the clinical outcomes of BoPTs and MPTs. Using the Refined Criteria, 35.7% of 140 patients with MPT developed metastases, whereas none (0%) of the patients with BoPT developed metastases. Patients with MPT have a high metastatic rate; these patients may benefit from systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapies. In contrast, patients with BoPT may be managed with complete local excision alone without chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1146-1153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002264\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)的恶性植物瘤(MPT)诊断标准可能会漏诊大量具有转移潜力的植物瘤。最近提出了新的恶性葡萄胎诊断标准(改良标准)。本研究的目的是验证 "改良标准"。这项验证研究包括 136 例边界线肿瘤(borderline phyllodes tumor [BoPT])和 MPT 病例,这些病例未被纳入最初的研究中。我们根据《改良标准》和世界卫生组织标准对肿瘤分类进行了评估。当符合以下标准时,细化标准即定义为 MPT:(1)基质过度生长,且≥1 个明显的基质细胞学特征、明显的基质细胞学不典型性或每 10 个高倍视野中≥10 个有丝分裂(10 个有丝分裂/10 HPFs);或(2)明显的基质细胞学特征,且≥1 个明显的基质细胞学不典型性特征、≥10 个有丝分裂/10 HPFs 或渗透性边界。世卫组织标准要求具备所有 5 个形态学特征(基质过度生长、渗透性边界、明显的基质细胞性、明显的基质细胞学不典型性和≥10 个有丝分裂/10 HPFs)才能诊断为 MPT。使用 "细化标准",61 例 BoPTs 中无一发生转移,75 例 MPTs 中 40.0% 发生转移;11.5% 的 BoPTs 和 25.3% 的 MPTs 出现局部复发。根据世界卫生组织的标准,94 例 BoPT 中有 9.6% 出现转移,42 例 MPT 中有 50.0% 出现转移;14.9% 的 BoPT 出现局部复发,28.6% 的 MPT 出现局部复发。根据世界卫生组织的标准,30 例发生远处转移的肿瘤中有 9 例(30.0%)被诊断为 BoPTs。当我们将该验证队列中的 75 例 MPT 病例与已发表数据中的 65 例 MPT 病例合并使用 "改良标准 "时,140 例 MPT 中有 50 例(35.7%)发生了转移,而有 8 例转移的病例是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation Study of the Newly Proposed Refined Diagnostic Criteria for Malignant Phyllodes Tumor With 136 Borderline and Malignant Phyllodes Tumor Cases.

The World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for malignant phyllodes tumor (MPT) may miss a significant number of MPTs with metastatic potential. New refined diagnostic criteria (Refined Criteria) for MPT were recently proposed. The aim of this study is to validate the Refined Criteria. This validation study included 136 borderline (borderline phyllodes tumor [BoPT]) and MPT cases that were not included in the initial study. We evaluated tumor classifications based on both the Refined Criteria and the WHO criteria. The Refined Criteria defines MPT when these criteria are met (1) stromal overgrowth with ≥ 1 feature(s) of marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, or ≥10 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (10 mitoses/10 HPFs) or (2) marked stromal cellularity with ≥1 feature(s) of marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs or permeative border. The WHO criteria require all 5 morphologic features (stromal overgrowth, permeative border, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, and ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs) for an MPT diagnosis. Using the Refined Criteria, none of the 61 BoPTs developed metastasis and 40.0% of the 75 MPTs developed metastases; local recurrence was seen in 11.5% BoPTs and 25.3% MPTs. Using the WHO criteria, 9.6% of the 94 BoPTs developed metastases and 50.0% of the 42 MPTs developed metastases; 14.9% of the BoPTs had local recurrence and 28.6% of the MPTs had local recurrence. Nine (30.0%) of the 30 tumors that developed distant metastases were diagnosed as BoPTs by the WHO criteria. When we combined the 75 MPTs from this validation cohort with the 65 MPT cases from the published data using the Refined Criteria, 50 (35.7%) of the 140 MPTs developed metastases, whereas 8 cases with metastases were <5 cm. In the univariate analysis with log-rank test, stromal overgrowth, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs, presence of heterologous components other than liposarcomatous component, and presence of stromal necrosis were significantly associated with the risk of metastasis (all with P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard regression, stromal overgrowth and marked stromal cellularity were significantly associated with metastasis (both with P < 0.001). The Refined Criteria are superior to the WHO criteria in predicting the clinical outcomes of BoPTs and MPTs. Using the Refined Criteria, 35.7% of 140 patients with MPT developed metastases, whereas none (0%) of the patients with BoPT developed metastases. Patients with MPT have a high metastatic rate; these patients may benefit from systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapies. In contrast, patients with BoPT may be managed with complete local excision alone without chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgical Pathology has achieved worldwide recognition for its outstanding coverage of the state of the art in human surgical pathology. In each monthly issue, experts present original articles, review articles, detailed case reports, and special features, enhanced by superb illustrations. Coverage encompasses technical methods, diagnostic aids, and frozen-section diagnosis, in addition to detailed pathologic studies of a wide range of disease entities. Official Journal of The Arthur Purdy Stout Society of Surgical Pathologists and The Gastrointestinal Pathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信