神经介入技能的培训与评估--范围界定审查方案。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Martine S Nielsen, Frederik V Ilkjær, Anders M Grejs, Anders B Nielsen, Lars Konge, Anne C Brøchner
{"title":"神经介入技能的培训与评估--范围界定审查方案。","authors":"Martine S Nielsen, Frederik V Ilkjær, Anders M Grejs, Anders B Nielsen, Lars Konge, Anne C Brøchner","doi":"10.1111/aas.14483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to the neuraxial space, including lumbar punctures and neuraxial anaesthesia, is an everyday procedure in clinical practice. Traditionally these procedures rely on manual palpation technique, but ultrasound is a useful tool when patients prove challenging. Presently, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for technical skills acquisition, both with and without ultrasound, and likewise, competency assessment approaches vary globally. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence regarding learning and assessment in neuraxial access <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ultrasound, for future educational recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, together with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search strategy will be based on a PICO approach, focusing on physicians, medical students, or nurses being exposed to education, training, or assessment in procedural neuraxial access <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ultrasound. No comparators are obligated, but outcomes should be assessable using the Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. The search will be performed in Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Independently, two authors will screen the studies and conflicts will be resolved by a third author. Relevant predefined data will be extracted and analysed using a descriptive approach. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This scoping review will contribute by presenting gathered evidence of an overview of the different approaches to achieving education and training of technical skills in neuraxial access, and how skills are tested, which could guide research and future recommendations for skills development and assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial access-Protocol of a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Martine S Nielsen, Frederik V Ilkjær, Anders M Grejs, Anders B Nielsen, Lars Konge, Anne C Brøchner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.14483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to the neuraxial space, including lumbar punctures and neuraxial anaesthesia, is an everyday procedure in clinical practice. Traditionally these procedures rely on manual palpation technique, but ultrasound is a useful tool when patients prove challenging. Presently, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for technical skills acquisition, both with and without ultrasound, and likewise, competency assessment approaches vary globally. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence regarding learning and assessment in neuraxial access <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ultrasound, for future educational recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, together with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search strategy will be based on a PICO approach, focusing on physicians, medical students, or nurses being exposed to education, training, or assessment in procedural neuraxial access <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\pm $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ultrasound. No comparators are obligated, but outcomes should be assessable using the Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. The search will be performed in Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Independently, two authors will screen the studies and conflicts will be resolved by a third author. Relevant predefined data will be extracted and analysed using a descriptive approach. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This scoping review will contribute by presenting gathered evidence of an overview of the different approaches to achieving education and training of technical skills in neuraxial access, and how skills are tested, which could guide research and future recommendations for skills development and assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:进入神经轴空间,包括腰椎穿刺和神经轴麻醉,是临床实践中的日常程序。传统上,这些程序依赖于人工触诊技术,但当病人被证明具有挑战性时,超声波是一种有用的工具。目前,无论是使用超声还是不使用超声,都缺乏以证据为基础的技术技能学习指南,同样,全球各地的能力评估方法也不尽相同。因此,我们旨在评估目前有关神经通路超声学习和评估的证据,以便为未来的教育提供建议:本次范围界定综述将根据系统和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明以及范围界定综述的 PRISMA 扩展进行。系统性检索策略将以 PICO 方法为基础,重点关注医生、医科学生或护士在程序性神经通路± $ \pm $ $ 超声方面所接受的教育、培训或评估。无需进行比较,但结果应可使用 Kirkpatrick 四级培训评估进行评估。检索将在 Cochrane Library、Embase、Medline、Scopus、PubMed 和 CINAHL 中进行。两位作者将独立筛选研究,冲突将由第三位作者解决。相关的预定义数据将采用描述性方法进行提取和分析。研究质量将使用医学教育研究质量工具进行评估:本范围界定综述将提供所收集的证据,概述实现神经通路技术技能教育和培训的不同方法,以及如何测试技能,从而为研究和未来的技能开发和评估建议提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial access-Protocol of a scoping review.

Background: Access to the neuraxial space, including lumbar punctures and neuraxial anaesthesia, is an everyday procedure in clinical practice. Traditionally these procedures rely on manual palpation technique, but ultrasound is a useful tool when patients prove challenging. Presently, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for technical skills acquisition, both with and without ultrasound, and likewise, competency assessment approaches vary globally. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence regarding learning and assessment in neuraxial access ± $$ \pm $$ ultrasound, for future educational recommendations.

Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, together with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search strategy will be based on a PICO approach, focusing on physicians, medical students, or nurses being exposed to education, training, or assessment in procedural neuraxial access ± $$ \pm $$ ultrasound. No comparators are obligated, but outcomes should be assessable using the Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. The search will be performed in Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Independently, two authors will screen the studies and conflicts will be resolved by a third author. Relevant predefined data will be extracted and analysed using a descriptive approach. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.

Discussion: This scoping review will contribute by presenting gathered evidence of an overview of the different approaches to achieving education and training of technical skills in neuraxial access, and how skills are tested, which could guide research and future recommendations for skills development and assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信