识别模拟开腹手术视频中的术中事件:一项关于麻醉师注意力不集中的多国研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Glenio B Mizubuti, Lais H N E Lima, Rodrigo M E Lima, Adrienne K Ho, Rita de Cássia Rodrigues, Daniel Carlos Cagnolati, Victório Dos Santos Júnior, Elio B R Belfiore, Filipe N C Santos, Wai Shun Vincent Lam, Mandy Chu, Linda T C Korz, Adam Szulewski, Michael McMullen, Jessica Burjorjee, Devin Sydor, Kathleen Carten, Louie Wang, Rachel Phelan, Bethany Smethurst, Camilyn Cheng, Wilma M Hopman, Anthony M-H Ho
{"title":"识别模拟开腹手术视频中的术中事件:一项关于麻醉师注意力不集中的多国研究。","authors":"Glenio B Mizubuti, Lais H N E Lima, Rodrigo M E Lima, Adrienne K Ho, Rita de Cássia Rodrigues, Daniel Carlos Cagnolati, Victório Dos Santos Júnior, Elio B R Belfiore, Filipe N C Santos, Wai Shun Vincent Lam, Mandy Chu, Linda T C Korz, Adam Szulewski, Michael McMullen, Jessica Burjorjee, Devin Sydor, Kathleen Carten, Louie Wang, Rachel Phelan, Bethany Smethurst, Camilyn Cheng, Wilma M Hopman, Anthony M-H Ho","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02788-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30 yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":"1229-1237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying intraoperative events in a simulated laparotomy video: a multinational study of inattentional blindness among anesthesiologists.\",\"authors\":\"Glenio B Mizubuti, Lais H N E Lima, Rodrigo M E Lima, Adrienne K Ho, Rita de Cássia Rodrigues, Daniel Carlos Cagnolati, Victório Dos Santos Júnior, Elio B R Belfiore, Filipe N C Santos, Wai Shun Vincent Lam, Mandy Chu, Linda T C Korz, Adam Szulewski, Michael McMullen, Jessica Burjorjee, Devin Sydor, Kathleen Carten, Louie Wang, Rachel Phelan, Bethany Smethurst, Camilyn Cheng, Wilma M Hopman, Anthony M-H Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-024-02788-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30 yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1229-1237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02788-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02788-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医疗失误偶尔可以用 "无意盲"(inattentional blindness,IB)来解释,即没有注意到某个事件/物体就在眼前。我们旨在确定在麻醉/手术环境中,年龄/经验、休息/疲劳以及以前接受过模拟教育是否会影响注意力盲区:在这项多中心/跨国研究中,方便抽样的 280 名麻醉师观看了一段模拟创伤患者进行开腹手术的视频,并(独立/匿名)记录了他们注意到的异常情况。视频中包含四种预期/常见异常(低血压、心动过速、缺氧、体温过低)和两种突出显示的意外/罕见事件(患者头部移动、中心静脉管泄漏)。我们分析了参与者注意到预期/非预期事件的能力(主要结果),以及根据年龄组和之前接受模拟教育的情况而得出的预期/非预期事件比例(次要结果):结果:所有年龄段的麻醉师注意到的意外/罕见事件都少于预期/常见事件。总体而言,年轻麻醉师错过的常见事件少于年长者(P = 0.02)。年龄与对意外/罕见事件的感知之间没有一致的联系(P = 0.28),但最年轻的组群(小于 30 岁)的表现优于其他年龄组。之前的模拟教育并不影响意外/罕见事件的失误比例,但与预期/常见事件的失误较少有关。结论:麻醉医师注意到的意外/罕见事件较少:麻醉医师在模拟创伤病人的注意力集中视频中注意到的意外/罕见临床事件少于预期/常见事件,这与 IB 一致。之前的模拟训练与预期/意料事件感知能力的提高有关,但并没有降低IB。我们的研究结果可能会对理解医疗事故和努力提高情景意识产生影响,尤其是在急性围手术期和重症监护环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying intraoperative events in a simulated laparotomy video: a multinational study of inattentional blindness among anesthesiologists.

Identifying intraoperative events in a simulated laparotomy video: a multinational study of inattentional blindness among anesthesiologists.

Purpose: Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting.

Methods: In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes).

Results: Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30 yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events.

Conclusion: Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信