癌症多学科医护人员在 "打破坏消息 "时患者与医生沟通的体验:定性系统回顾

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"癌症多学科医护人员在 \"打破坏消息 \"时患者与医生沟通的体验:定性系统回顾","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore patient experiences of patient–clinician communication during the critical moments of “breaking bad news” in cancer care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and has been reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus, were searched from the beginning of their date range coverage to April 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and a meta-aggregation approach was used for data synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-eight studies were included and represented 976 patients. Key themes included (1) sensing something is wrong (prior to diagnosis), (2) reaction to the diagnosis, (3) information (during breaking bad news), (4) communication with health care professionals, (5) specialist versus nonspecialist centers, (6) decision-making, and (7) feeling supported. The review underscores the need for health care professionals to adeptly navigate and respond to individual patient needs during confronting and distressing times.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The complexity and individuality of patient–clinician communication suggest that further education is needed among the cancer multidisciplinary team to develop personalized, empathetic communication strategies in clinical practice, catering to diverse patient preferences. The findings call for more inclusive research across different cultures and languages, and a need to understand evolving communication needs, especially in the context of increasing digital communication modalities in health care.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Cancer Survivorship</h3><p>This review provides valuable new insights into developing effective communication strategies that are responsive to the diverse needs of patients undergoing cancer treatment. Its findings emphasize the importance of empathy, flexibility, and a personalized approach in delivering bad news and supporting patients throughout survivorship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001414/pdfft?md5=211ab73748b79f92867ceac41a46a923&pid=1-s2.0-S0749208124001414-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Experiences of Patient–Clinician Communication Among Cancer Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professionals During “Breaking Bad News”: A Qualitative Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore patient experiences of patient–clinician communication during the critical moments of “breaking bad news” in cancer care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and has been reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus, were searched from the beginning of their date range coverage to April 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and a meta-aggregation approach was used for data synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-eight studies were included and represented 976 patients. Key themes included (1) sensing something is wrong (prior to diagnosis), (2) reaction to the diagnosis, (3) information (during breaking bad news), (4) communication with health care professionals, (5) specialist versus nonspecialist centers, (6) decision-making, and (7) feeling supported. The review underscores the need for health care professionals to adeptly navigate and respond to individual patient needs during confronting and distressing times.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The complexity and individuality of patient–clinician communication suggest that further education is needed among the cancer multidisciplinary team to develop personalized, empathetic communication strategies in clinical practice, catering to diverse patient preferences. The findings call for more inclusive research across different cultures and languages, and a need to understand evolving communication needs, especially in the context of increasing digital communication modalities in health care.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Cancer Survivorship</h3><p>This review provides valuable new insights into developing effective communication strategies that are responsive to the diverse needs of patients undergoing cancer treatment. Its findings emphasize the importance of empathy, flexibility, and a personalized approach in delivering bad news and supporting patients throughout survivorship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001414/pdfft?md5=211ab73748b79f92867ceac41a46a923&pid=1-s2.0-S0749208124001414-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨患者在癌症治疗中 "告知坏消息 "的关键时刻与医生沟通的体验:定性系统综述采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法,并根据 PRISMA 指南进行报告。检索的数据库包括 APA PsycINFO、CINAHL、MEDLINE 和 Scopus,检索时间从其覆盖日期范围开始至 2023 年 4 月。进行了数据提取和质量评估,并采用元聚合法进行数据综合:结果:共纳入 28 项研究,代表了 976 名患者。关键主题包括:(1) 感觉到不对劲(诊断前);(2) 对诊断的反应;(3) 信息(噩耗传来时);(4) 与医护人员的沟通;(5) 专科中心与非专科中心;(6) 决策;(7) 感受到支持。综述强调,医护人员需要在病人面临困难和痛苦的时候善于引导和应对病人的个性化需求:患者与医生沟通的复杂性和个性化表明,需要在癌症多学科团队中开展进一步的教育,以便在临床实践中制定个性化、富有同情心的沟通策略,满足不同患者的偏好。研究结果呼吁开展更具包容性的跨文化和跨语言研究,并需要了解不断变化的沟通需求,尤其是在医疗保健领域数字沟通模式不断增加的背景下:本综述为制定有效的沟通策略提供了宝贵的新见解,这些策略能够满足接受癌症治疗的患者的不同需求。其研究结果强调了在传递坏消息和支持患者的整个生存过程中,同理心、灵活性和个性化方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Experiences of Patient–Clinician Communication Among Cancer Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professionals During “Breaking Bad News”: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Purpose

To explore patient experiences of patient–clinician communication during the critical moments of “breaking bad news” in cancer care.

Methods

A qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and has been reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus, were searched from the beginning of their date range coverage to April 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and a meta-aggregation approach was used for data synthesis.

Results

Twenty-eight studies were included and represented 976 patients. Key themes included (1) sensing something is wrong (prior to diagnosis), (2) reaction to the diagnosis, (3) information (during breaking bad news), (4) communication with health care professionals, (5) specialist versus nonspecialist centers, (6) decision-making, and (7) feeling supported. The review underscores the need for health care professionals to adeptly navigate and respond to individual patient needs during confronting and distressing times.

Conclusions

The complexity and individuality of patient–clinician communication suggest that further education is needed among the cancer multidisciplinary team to develop personalized, empathetic communication strategies in clinical practice, catering to diverse patient preferences. The findings call for more inclusive research across different cultures and languages, and a need to understand evolving communication needs, especially in the context of increasing digital communication modalities in health care.

Implications for Cancer Survivorship

This review provides valuable new insights into developing effective communication strategies that are responsive to the diverse needs of patients undergoing cancer treatment. Its findings emphasize the importance of empathy, flexibility, and a personalized approach in delivering bad news and supporting patients throughout survivorship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信