现代诊断程序--在罗马尼亚急诊医生的日常工作中引入护理点超声波。

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
George-Catalin Bouros, Tudor Ovidiu Popa, Paul Lucian Nedelea, Emilian Manolescu, Anca Haisan, Iulia Roca, Petruta Morosanu, Alexandra Hauta, Gabriela Grigorasi, Mihaela Corlade-Andrei, Diana Cimpoesu
{"title":"现代诊断程序--在罗马尼亚急诊医生的日常工作中引入护理点超声波。","authors":"George-Catalin Bouros, Tudor Ovidiu Popa, Paul Lucian Nedelea, Emilian Manolescu, Anca Haisan, Iulia Roca, Petruta Morosanu, Alexandra Hauta, Gabriela Grigorasi, Mihaela Corlade-Andrei, Diana Cimpoesu","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14030090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medicine in Romania has developed fast since inception. The need for faster diagnostic capabilities due to the high workload pre- and in-hospital made point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) a logical next step. The advantages of POCUS are well known, but implementation presents challenges. Our goal was to study how a straightforward method of implementation would work locally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two prospective observational studies were conducted at 6 months (prehospital) and 4 months (in-hospital). The protocol used was extended focused assessment sonography in trauma (eFAST), and the shock index (SI) was used to stratify patients. Voluntary sampling was conducted by emergency physicians. The primary outcomes were patient numbers, type of case use, results, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prehospital study registered 34 patients: 41% traumas, 35% cardiac arrest, 18% shock, and 6% acute respiratory distress. The in-hospital study patients were 78: 36% traumas, 6% cardiac arrests, 41% shock, and 17% acute respiratory distress. A total of 88.5% of the cases were confirmed with definitive imagistic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The studies mark an increase in POCUS usage and use in complicated cases. Providing supervision and feedback into clinical practice resulted in a further increase in POCUS usage, the second study having an 88.5% accuracy when compared to the final diagnostic proving the increased efficiency of a longitudinal training approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"1137-1148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11203034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Modern Diagnostic Procedure-The Introduction of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Romanian Emergency Physicians' Daily Routine.\",\"authors\":\"George-Catalin Bouros, Tudor Ovidiu Popa, Paul Lucian Nedelea, Emilian Manolescu, Anca Haisan, Iulia Roca, Petruta Morosanu, Alexandra Hauta, Gabriela Grigorasi, Mihaela Corlade-Andrei, Diana Cimpoesu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract14030090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medicine in Romania has developed fast since inception. The need for faster diagnostic capabilities due to the high workload pre- and in-hospital made point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) a logical next step. The advantages of POCUS are well known, but implementation presents challenges. Our goal was to study how a straightforward method of implementation would work locally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two prospective observational studies were conducted at 6 months (prehospital) and 4 months (in-hospital). The protocol used was extended focused assessment sonography in trauma (eFAST), and the shock index (SI) was used to stratify patients. Voluntary sampling was conducted by emergency physicians. The primary outcomes were patient numbers, type of case use, results, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prehospital study registered 34 patients: 41% traumas, 35% cardiac arrest, 18% shock, and 6% acute respiratory distress. The in-hospital study patients were 78: 36% traumas, 6% cardiac arrests, 41% shock, and 17% acute respiratory distress. A total of 88.5% of the cases were confirmed with definitive imagistic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The studies mark an increase in POCUS usage and use in complicated cases. Providing supervision and feedback into clinical practice resulted in a further increase in POCUS usage, the second study having an 88.5% accuracy when compared to the final diagnostic proving the increased efficiency of a longitudinal training approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"1137-1148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11203034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14030090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14030090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:罗马尼亚的急诊医学自诞生以来发展迅速。由于院前和院内工作量大,需要更快的诊断能力,因此下一步理所当然地需要进行床旁超声检查(POCUS)。POCUS 的优势众所周知,但实施起来却面临挑战。我们的目标是研究如何在当地采用一种简单易行的方法:我们分别在 6 个月(院前)和 4 个月(院内)进行了两项前瞻性观察研究。采用的方案是扩展的创伤聚焦超声评估(eFAST),并使用休克指数(SI)对患者进行分层。急诊医生进行自愿抽样。主要结果包括患者人数、病例使用类型、结果和准确性:院前研究登记了 34 名患者:结果:院前研究登记了 34 名患者:41% 为外伤,35% 为心脏骤停,18% 为休克,6% 为急性呼吸窘迫。院内研究患者为 78 人:外伤占 36%,心脏骤停占 6%,休克占 41%,急性呼吸困难占 17%。88.5%的病例得到了明确的影像学证实:研究表明,POCUS 的使用率和复杂病例的使用率均有所提高。在临床实践中提供监督和反馈,进一步提高了 POCUS 的使用率,与最终诊断结果相比,第二次研究的准确率达到 88.5%,证明纵向培训方法提高了效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Modern Diagnostic Procedure-The Introduction of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Romanian Emergency Physicians' Daily Routine.

Background: Emergency medicine in Romania has developed fast since inception. The need for faster diagnostic capabilities due to the high workload pre- and in-hospital made point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) a logical next step. The advantages of POCUS are well known, but implementation presents challenges. Our goal was to study how a straightforward method of implementation would work locally.

Methods: Two prospective observational studies were conducted at 6 months (prehospital) and 4 months (in-hospital). The protocol used was extended focused assessment sonography in trauma (eFAST), and the shock index (SI) was used to stratify patients. Voluntary sampling was conducted by emergency physicians. The primary outcomes were patient numbers, type of case use, results, and accuracy.

Results: The prehospital study registered 34 patients: 41% traumas, 35% cardiac arrest, 18% shock, and 6% acute respiratory distress. The in-hospital study patients were 78: 36% traumas, 6% cardiac arrests, 41% shock, and 17% acute respiratory distress. A total of 88.5% of the cases were confirmed with definitive imagistic findings.

Conclusion: The studies mark an increase in POCUS usage and use in complicated cases. Providing supervision and feedback into clinical practice resulted in a further increase in POCUS usage, the second study having an 88.5% accuracy when compared to the final diagnostic proving the increased efficiency of a longitudinal training approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信