激素受体阳性/人类表皮生长因子 2 阴性晚期乳腺癌 21 基因乳腺复发评分®测定的预后价值:日本乳腺癌研究小组-M07(FUTURE 试验)的子分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07414-7
Takayuki Iwamoto, Naoki Niikura, Kenichi Watanabe, Takashi Takeshita, Yuichiro Kikawa, Kokoro Kobayashi, Nobutaka Iwakuma, Takuho Okamura, Takayuki Kobayashi, Yuriko Katagiri, Masahiro Kitada, Nobumoto Tomioka, Yasuo Miyoshi, Hideo Shigematsu, Minoru Miyashita, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Norikazu Masuda, Shigehira Saji
{"title":"激素受体阳性/人类表皮生长因子 2 阴性晚期乳腺癌 21 基因乳腺复发评分®测定的预后价值:日本乳腺癌研究小组-M07(FUTURE 试验)的子分析。","authors":"Takayuki Iwamoto, Naoki Niikura, Kenichi Watanabe, Takashi Takeshita, Yuichiro Kikawa, Kokoro Kobayashi, Nobutaka Iwakuma, Takuho Okamura, Takayuki Kobayashi, Yuriko Katagiri, Masahiro Kitada, Nobumoto Tomioka, Yasuo Miyoshi, Hideo Shigematsu, Minoru Miyashita, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Norikazu Masuda, Shigehira Saji","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07414-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay from primary breast tissue predicts the prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancers (ABCs) treated with fulvestrant monotherapy (Group A) and the addition of palbociclib combined with fulvestrant (Group B), which included those who had progression in Group A from the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis based on original recurrence score (RS) categories (Low: 0-17, Intermediate: 18-30, High: 31-100) by treatment groups (A and B) and types of ABCs (recurrence and de novo stage IV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 102 patients [Low: n = 44 (43.1%), Intermediate: n = 38 (37.5%), High: n = 20 (19.6%)] in Group A, and 45 in Group B, who had progression in Group A were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23.8 months for Group A and 8.9 months for Group B. Multivariate analysis in Group A showed that low-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.53, P = 0.003] and intermediate-risk (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78) with de novo stage IV breast cancer were significantly associated with better prognosis compared to high-risk. However, no significant difference was observed among patients with recurrence. No prognostic significance was observed in Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a distinct prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay by the types of ABCs and a poor prognostic value of the high RS for patients with de novo stage IV BC treated with fulvestrant monotherapy. Further validations of these findings are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"253-262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: subanalysis from Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).\",\"authors\":\"Takayuki Iwamoto, Naoki Niikura, Kenichi Watanabe, Takashi Takeshita, Yuichiro Kikawa, Kokoro Kobayashi, Nobutaka Iwakuma, Takuho Okamura, Takayuki Kobayashi, Yuriko Katagiri, Masahiro Kitada, Nobumoto Tomioka, Yasuo Miyoshi, Hideo Shigematsu, Minoru Miyashita, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Norikazu Masuda, Shigehira Saji\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-024-07414-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay from primary breast tissue predicts the prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancers (ABCs) treated with fulvestrant monotherapy (Group A) and the addition of palbociclib combined with fulvestrant (Group B), which included those who had progression in Group A from the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis based on original recurrence score (RS) categories (Low: 0-17, Intermediate: 18-30, High: 31-100) by treatment groups (A and B) and types of ABCs (recurrence and de novo stage IV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 102 patients [Low: n = 44 (43.1%), Intermediate: n = 38 (37.5%), High: n = 20 (19.6%)] in Group A, and 45 in Group B, who had progression in Group A were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23.8 months for Group A and 8.9 months for Group B. Multivariate analysis in Group A showed that low-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.53, P = 0.003] and intermediate-risk (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78) with de novo stage IV breast cancer were significantly associated with better prognosis compared to high-risk. However, no significant difference was observed among patients with recurrence. No prognostic significance was observed in Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a distinct prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay by the types of ABCs and a poor prognostic value of the high RS for patients with de novo stage IV BC treated with fulvestrant monotherapy. Further validations of these findings are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"253-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07414-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07414-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定原发性乳腺组织的21-基因乳腺复发评分®检测是否能预测激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子2阴性晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者接受氟维司群单一疗法(A组)和帕博西利联合氟维司群(B组)治疗后的预后,B组包括日本乳腺癌研究组-M07(FUTURE试验)A组中病情进展的患者:根据治疗组(A 组和 B 组)和 ABCs 类型(复发和新发 IV 期)的原始复发评分(RS)类别(低:0-17 分,中:18-30 分,高:31-100 分),使用对数秩检验和 Cox 回归分析比较无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS):结果:共分析了 102 例 A 组患者(低:44 例(43.1%),中:38 例(37.5%),高:20 例(19.6%))和 45 例 B 组患者(A 组患者病情进展)。A 组的中位随访时间为 23.8 个月,B 组为 8.9 个月。A 组的多变量分析显示,与高风险相比,低风险[危险比(HR)0.15,95% 置信区间(CI)0.04-0.53,P = 0.003]和中风险(HR 0.22,95% CI 0.06-0.78)的新发 IV 期乳腺癌患者预后较好。但在复发患者中未观察到明显差异。在 B 组中没有观察到预后意义:我们发现,对于接受氟维司群单药治疗的新发Ⅳ期乳腺癌患者,21-基因乳腺复发评分®检测的ABC类型具有明显的预后价值,而高RS的预后价值较差。这些发现还需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: subanalysis from Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).

Prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: subanalysis from Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay from primary breast tissue predicts the prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancers (ABCs) treated with fulvestrant monotherapy (Group A) and the addition of palbociclib combined with fulvestrant (Group B), which included those who had progression in Group A from the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).

Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis based on original recurrence score (RS) categories (Low: 0-17, Intermediate: 18-30, High: 31-100) by treatment groups (A and B) and types of ABCs (recurrence and de novo stage IV).

Results: In total, 102 patients [Low: n = 44 (43.1%), Intermediate: n = 38 (37.5%), High: n = 20 (19.6%)] in Group A, and 45 in Group B, who had progression in Group A were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23.8 months for Group A and 8.9 months for Group B. Multivariate analysis in Group A showed that low-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.53, P = 0.003] and intermediate-risk (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78) with de novo stage IV breast cancer were significantly associated with better prognosis compared to high-risk. However, no significant difference was observed among patients with recurrence. No prognostic significance was observed in Group B.

Conclusion: We found a distinct prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay by the types of ABCs and a poor prognostic value of the high RS for patients with de novo stage IV BC treated with fulvestrant monotherapy. Further validations of these findings are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信