METTE BORBJERG, ANNIKA V. KVIST, KALA MEHTA, NIELS EJSKJAER, JENISE C. WONG
{"title":"1910-LB: 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年患者开始连续血糖监测的差异及其对血糖控制的影响","authors":"METTE BORBJERG, ANNIKA V. KVIST, KALA MEHTA, NIELS EJSKJAER, JENISE C. WONG","doi":"10.2337/db24-1910-lb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & Objective: The American Diabetes Association recommends continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for all people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) as early as the time of diagnosis. CGM has been associated with reductions in HbA1c, and it has been recommended that CGM should be initiated within 12 months of diagnosis. We aimed to determine the impact of insurance and race/ethnicity on the timing of CGM initiation in children with T1D and to compare glycemic control in those initiating CGM within six months of diagnosis compared to later initiation. Methods: Children up to age 21 years followed at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital diagnosed with T1D between February 2015 and September 2021 were included (n = 270) and grouped according to time of CGM initiation. Analysis of insurance and race/ethnicity was done using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis H-test. T-test and Wilcoxon test were performed to compare early and late CGM initiation. Results: The median time from T1D diagnosis to CGM initiation was 6 months for publicly insured individuals compared to 2 months for privately insured individuals (p-value < 0.001), similar differences were found between individuals of racial or ethnic minority (minority) groups and individuals identified as white, non-Hispanic. Median HbA1c was 7.5% for children with time-of-initiation < 6 months; 8.4% for children with time-of-initiation > 6 months (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Publicly insured children and children of minority groups experience delays in starting recommended T1D treatment with CGM, with a longer time-to-initiation as compared to privately insured children and white, non-Hispanic children. This is of clinical importance, as more optimal glycemic control has been associated with earlier initiation of CGM. Barriers to CGM initiation may result in less optimal glycemic control for publicly insured children and children of minority groups with diabetes. Disclosure M. Borbjerg: None. K. Mehta: None. N. Ejskjaer: None. J.C. Wong: Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Abbott.","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1910-LB: Disparities in Initiation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Impact on Glycemic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes\",\"authors\":\"METTE BORBJERG, ANNIKA V. KVIST, KALA MEHTA, NIELS EJSKJAER, JENISE C. WONG\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/db24-1910-lb\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction & Objective: The American Diabetes Association recommends continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for all people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) as early as the time of diagnosis. CGM has been associated with reductions in HbA1c, and it has been recommended that CGM should be initiated within 12 months of diagnosis. We aimed to determine the impact of insurance and race/ethnicity on the timing of CGM initiation in children with T1D and to compare glycemic control in those initiating CGM within six months of diagnosis compared to later initiation. Methods: Children up to age 21 years followed at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital diagnosed with T1D between February 2015 and September 2021 were included (n = 270) and grouped according to time of CGM initiation. Analysis of insurance and race/ethnicity was done using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis H-test. T-test and Wilcoxon test were performed to compare early and late CGM initiation. Results: The median time from T1D diagnosis to CGM initiation was 6 months for publicly insured individuals compared to 2 months for privately insured individuals (p-value < 0.001), similar differences were found between individuals of racial or ethnic minority (minority) groups and individuals identified as white, non-Hispanic. Median HbA1c was 7.5% for children with time-of-initiation < 6 months; 8.4% for children with time-of-initiation > 6 months (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Publicly insured children and children of minority groups experience delays in starting recommended T1D treatment with CGM, with a longer time-to-initiation as compared to privately insured children and white, non-Hispanic children. This is of clinical importance, as more optimal glycemic control has been associated with earlier initiation of CGM. Barriers to CGM initiation may result in less optimal glycemic control for publicly insured children and children of minority groups with diabetes. Disclosure M. Borbjerg: None. K. Mehta: None. N. Ejskjaer: None. J.C. Wong: Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Abbott.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/db24-1910-lb\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db24-1910-lb","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
1910-LB: Disparities in Initiation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Impact on Glycemic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
Introduction & Objective: The American Diabetes Association recommends continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for all people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) as early as the time of diagnosis. CGM has been associated with reductions in HbA1c, and it has been recommended that CGM should be initiated within 12 months of diagnosis. We aimed to determine the impact of insurance and race/ethnicity on the timing of CGM initiation in children with T1D and to compare glycemic control in those initiating CGM within six months of diagnosis compared to later initiation. Methods: Children up to age 21 years followed at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital diagnosed with T1D between February 2015 and September 2021 were included (n = 270) and grouped according to time of CGM initiation. Analysis of insurance and race/ethnicity was done using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis H-test. T-test and Wilcoxon test were performed to compare early and late CGM initiation. Results: The median time from T1D diagnosis to CGM initiation was 6 months for publicly insured individuals compared to 2 months for privately insured individuals (p-value < 0.001), similar differences were found between individuals of racial or ethnic minority (minority) groups and individuals identified as white, non-Hispanic. Median HbA1c was 7.5% for children with time-of-initiation < 6 months; 8.4% for children with time-of-initiation > 6 months (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Publicly insured children and children of minority groups experience delays in starting recommended T1D treatment with CGM, with a longer time-to-initiation as compared to privately insured children and white, non-Hispanic children. This is of clinical importance, as more optimal glycemic control has been associated with earlier initiation of CGM. Barriers to CGM initiation may result in less optimal glycemic control for publicly insured children and children of minority groups with diabetes. Disclosure M. Borbjerg: None. K. Mehta: None. N. Ejskjaer: None. J.C. Wong: Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Abbott.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes.
However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.