Anna L. Park M.Phil. , Brian T. Feeley M.D. , Alan L. Zhang M.D. , C. Benjamin Ma M.D. , Drew A. Lansdown M.D.
{"title":"半月板同种异体移植同时进行软骨修复或截骨术的 2 年再手术率无差异:一项国家数据库研究。","authors":"Anna L. Park M.Phil. , Brian T. Feeley M.D. , Alan L. Zhang M.D. , C. Benjamin Ma M.D. , Drew A. Lansdown M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate reoperation rates after meniscus allograft transplant (MAT), comparing rates with and without concomitant articular cartilage and osteotomy procedures using a national insurance claims database.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent MAT from 2010 to 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up using the PearlDiver database. Using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes, we identified patients who underwent concomitant procedures including chondroplasty or microfracture, cartilage restoration defined as osteochondral graft or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), or osteotomy. Univariate logistic regressions identified risk factors for reoperation. Reoperations were classified as knee arthroplasty, interventional procedures, or diagnostic or debridement procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 750 patients with an average age of 29.6 years (interquartile range: 21.0-36.8) and average follow-up time was 5.41 years (SD: 2.51). Ninety-day, 2-year, and all-time reoperation rates were 1.33%, 14.4%, and 27.6%, respectively. MAT with cartilage restoration was associated with increased reoperation rate at 90 days (odds ratio: 4.88; 95% confidence interval: 1.38-19.27; <em>P</em> = .015); however, there was no significant difference in reoperation rates at 2 years or to the end of follow-up. ACI had increased reoperation rates at 90 days (odds ratio: 6.95; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-25.96; <em>P</em> = .006), with no difference in reoperation rates 2 years postoperatively or to the end of follow-up. Osteochondral autograft and allograft were not associated with increased reoperation rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In our cohort, 14.4% of patients had a reoperation within 2 years of MAT. Nearly 1 in 4 patients undergoing MAT had concomitant cartilage restoration, showing that it is commonly performed on patients with articular cartilage damage. Concomitant osteochondral autograft, osteochondral allograft, chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteotomy were not associated with any significant difference in reoperation rates. ACI was associated with increased reoperation rates at 90 days, but not later.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective cohort study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"Pages 1451-1458.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Differences in 2-Year Reoperation Rates for Meniscus Allograft Transplant With Concomitant Cartilage Restoration or Osteotomy: A National Database Study\",\"authors\":\"Anna L. Park M.Phil. , Brian T. Feeley M.D. , Alan L. Zhang M.D. , C. Benjamin Ma M.D. , Drew A. Lansdown M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.06.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate reoperation rates after meniscus allograft transplant (MAT), comparing rates with and without concomitant articular cartilage and osteotomy procedures using a national insurance claims database.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent MAT from 2010 to 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up using the PearlDiver database. Using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes, we identified patients who underwent concomitant procedures including chondroplasty or microfracture, cartilage restoration defined as osteochondral graft or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), or osteotomy. Univariate logistic regressions identified risk factors for reoperation. Reoperations were classified as knee arthroplasty, interventional procedures, or diagnostic or debridement procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 750 patients with an average age of 29.6 years (interquartile range: 21.0-36.8) and average follow-up time was 5.41 years (SD: 2.51). Ninety-day, 2-year, and all-time reoperation rates were 1.33%, 14.4%, and 27.6%, respectively. MAT with cartilage restoration was associated with increased reoperation rate at 90 days (odds ratio: 4.88; 95% confidence interval: 1.38-19.27; <em>P</em> = .015); however, there was no significant difference in reoperation rates at 2 years or to the end of follow-up. ACI had increased reoperation rates at 90 days (odds ratio: 6.95; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-25.96; <em>P</em> = .006), with no difference in reoperation rates 2 years postoperatively or to the end of follow-up. Osteochondral autograft and allograft were not associated with increased reoperation rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In our cohort, 14.4% of patients had a reoperation within 2 years of MAT. Nearly 1 in 4 patients undergoing MAT had concomitant cartilage restoration, showing that it is commonly performed on patients with articular cartilage damage. Concomitant osteochondral autograft, osteochondral allograft, chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteotomy were not associated with any significant difference in reoperation rates. ACI was associated with increased reoperation rates at 90 days, but not later.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective cohort study.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1451-1458.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324004572\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324004572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
No Differences in 2-Year Reoperation Rates for Meniscus Allograft Transplant With Concomitant Cartilage Restoration or Osteotomy: A National Database Study
Purpose
To investigate reoperation rates after meniscus allograft transplant (MAT), comparing rates with and without concomitant articular cartilage and osteotomy procedures using a national insurance claims database.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent MAT from 2010 to 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up using the PearlDiver database. Using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes, we identified patients who underwent concomitant procedures including chondroplasty or microfracture, cartilage restoration defined as osteochondral graft or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), or osteotomy. Univariate logistic regressions identified risk factors for reoperation. Reoperations were classified as knee arthroplasty, interventional procedures, or diagnostic or debridement procedures.
Results
The study included 750 patients with an average age of 29.6 years (interquartile range: 21.0-36.8) and average follow-up time was 5.41 years (SD: 2.51). Ninety-day, 2-year, and all-time reoperation rates were 1.33%, 14.4%, and 27.6%, respectively. MAT with cartilage restoration was associated with increased reoperation rate at 90 days (odds ratio: 4.88; 95% confidence interval: 1.38-19.27; P = .015); however, there was no significant difference in reoperation rates at 2 years or to the end of follow-up. ACI had increased reoperation rates at 90 days (odds ratio: 6.95; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-25.96; P = .006), with no difference in reoperation rates 2 years postoperatively or to the end of follow-up. Osteochondral autograft and allograft were not associated with increased reoperation rates.
Conclusions
In our cohort, 14.4% of patients had a reoperation within 2 years of MAT. Nearly 1 in 4 patients undergoing MAT had concomitant cartilage restoration, showing that it is commonly performed on patients with articular cartilage damage. Concomitant osteochondral autograft, osteochondral allograft, chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteotomy were not associated with any significant difference in reoperation rates. ACI was associated with increased reoperation rates at 90 days, but not later.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.