Juha Koivisto, Jan Wolff, Ruben Pauwels, Touko Kaasalainen, Anni Suomalainen, Patricia Stoor, Jani Horelli, Juho Suojanen
{"title":"评估用于可视化手术规划的最佳 STL 模型的锥束 CT 技术图像质量指标和辐射剂量。","authors":"Juha Koivisto, Jan Wolff, Ruben Pauwels, Touko Kaasalainen, Anni Suomalainen, Patricia Stoor, Jani Horelli, Juho Suojanen","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols that offer an optimal balance between effective dose (ED) and 3D model for orthognathic virtual surgery planning, using CT as a reference, and to assess whether such protocols can be defined based on technical image quality metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven CBCT (VISO G7, Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) scan protocols were selected out of 32 candidate protocols, based on ED and technical image quality measurements. Next, an anthropomorphic RANDO SK150 phantom was scanned using these 11 CBCT protocols and 2 CT scanners for bone quantity assessments. The resulting DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files were converted into Standard Tessellation Language (STL) models that were used for bone volume and area measurements in the predefined orbital region to assess the validity of each CBCT protocol for virtual surgical planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest CBCT bone volume and area of the STL models were obtained using normal dose protocol (F2) and ultra-low dose protocol (J13), which resulted in 48% and 96% of the mean STL bone volume and 48% and 95% of the bone area measured on CT scanners, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The normal dose CBCT protocol \"F2\" offered optimal bone area and volume balance for STL. The optimal CBCT protocol can be defined using contrast-to-noise ratio and modulation transfer function values that were similar to those of the reference CT scanners'. CBCT scanners with selected protocols can offer a viable alternative to CT scanners for acquiring STL models for virtual surgical planning at a lower effective dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"423-433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of cone-beam CT technical image quality indicators and radiation dose for optimal STL model used in visual surgical planning.\",\"authors\":\"Juha Koivisto, Jan Wolff, Ruben Pauwels, Touko Kaasalainen, Anni Suomalainen, Patricia Stoor, Jani Horelli, Juho Suojanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twae026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols that offer an optimal balance between effective dose (ED) and 3D model for orthognathic virtual surgery planning, using CT as a reference, and to assess whether such protocols can be defined based on technical image quality metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven CBCT (VISO G7, Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) scan protocols were selected out of 32 candidate protocols, based on ED and technical image quality measurements. Next, an anthropomorphic RANDO SK150 phantom was scanned using these 11 CBCT protocols and 2 CT scanners for bone quantity assessments. The resulting DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files were converted into Standard Tessellation Language (STL) models that were used for bone volume and area measurements in the predefined orbital region to assess the validity of each CBCT protocol for virtual surgical planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest CBCT bone volume and area of the STL models were obtained using normal dose protocol (F2) and ultra-low dose protocol (J13), which resulted in 48% and 96% of the mean STL bone volume and 48% and 95% of the bone area measured on CT scanners, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The normal dose CBCT protocol \\\"F2\\\" offered optimal bone area and volume balance for STL. The optimal CBCT protocol can be defined using contrast-to-noise ratio and modulation transfer function values that were similar to those of the reference CT scanners'. CBCT scanners with selected protocols can offer a viable alternative to CT scanners for acquiring STL models for virtual surgical planning at a lower effective dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"423-433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of cone-beam CT technical image quality indicators and radiation dose for optimal STL model used in visual surgical planning.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols that offer an optimal balance between effective dose (ED) and 3D model for orthognathic virtual surgery planning, using CT as a reference, and to assess whether such protocols can be defined based on technical image quality metrics.
Methods: Eleven CBCT (VISO G7, Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) scan protocols were selected out of 32 candidate protocols, based on ED and technical image quality measurements. Next, an anthropomorphic RANDO SK150 phantom was scanned using these 11 CBCT protocols and 2 CT scanners for bone quantity assessments. The resulting DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files were converted into Standard Tessellation Language (STL) models that were used for bone volume and area measurements in the predefined orbital region to assess the validity of each CBCT protocol for virtual surgical planning.
Results: The highest CBCT bone volume and area of the STL models were obtained using normal dose protocol (F2) and ultra-low dose protocol (J13), which resulted in 48% and 96% of the mean STL bone volume and 48% and 95% of the bone area measured on CT scanners, respectively.
Conclusions: The normal dose CBCT protocol "F2" offered optimal bone area and volume balance for STL. The optimal CBCT protocol can be defined using contrast-to-noise ratio and modulation transfer function values that were similar to those of the reference CT scanners'. CBCT scanners with selected protocols can offer a viable alternative to CT scanners for acquiring STL models for virtual surgical planning at a lower effective dose.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X