类风湿性关节炎治疗策略对血脂和血管炎症的影响:TARGET 随机积极比较试验的二次分析

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Katherine P. Liao, Pamela Rist, Jon Giles, Leah Santacroce, Margery A. Connelly, Robert J. Glynn, Paul Ridker, Ahmed Tawakol, Joan Bathon, Daniel H. Solomon
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎治疗策略对血脂和血管炎症的影响:TARGET 随机积极比较试验的二次分析","authors":"Katherine P. Liao, Pamela Rist, Jon Giles, Leah Santacroce, Margery A. Connelly, Robert J. Glynn, Paul Ridker, Ahmed Tawakol, Joan Bathon, Daniel H. Solomon","doi":"10.1186/s13075-024-03352-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are associated with complex changes in lipids and lipoproteins that may impact cardiovascular (CV) risk. The objective of this study was to examine lipid and lipoprotein changes associated with two common RA treatment strategies, triple therapy or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), and association with CV risk. In this secondary data analysis of the TARGET trial, methotrexate (MTX) inadequate responders with RA were randomized to either add sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine (triple therapy), or TNFi for 24-weeks. The primary trial outcome was the change in arterial inflammation measured in the carotid arteries or aorta by FDG-PET/CT at baseline and 24-weeks; this change was described as the target-to-background ratio (TBR) in the most diseased segment (MDS). Routine lipids and advanced lipoproteins were measured at baseline and 24-weeks; subjects on statin therapy at baseline were excluded. Comparisons between baseline and follow-up lipid measurements were performed within and across treatment arms, as well as change in lipids and change in MDS-TBR. We studied 122 participants, 61 in each treatment arm, with median age 57 years, 76% female, and 1.5 year median RA disease duration. When comparing treatment arms, triple therapy had on average a larger reduction in triglycerides (15.9 mg/dL, p = 0.01), total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio (0.29, p-value = 0.01), and LDL particle number (111.2, p = 0.02) compared to TNFi. TNFi had on average a larger increase in HDL particle number (1.6umol/L, p = 0.006). We observed no correlation between change in lipid measurements and change in MDS-TBR within and across treatment arms. Both treatment strategies were associated with improved lipid profiles via changes in different lipids and lipoproteins. These effects had no correlation with change in CV risk as measured by vascular inflammation by FDG-PET/CT. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02374021.","PeriodicalId":8419,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of RA treatment strategies on lipids and vascular inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: a secondary analysis of the TARGET randomized active comparator trial\",\"authors\":\"Katherine P. Liao, Pamela Rist, Jon Giles, Leah Santacroce, Margery A. Connelly, Robert J. Glynn, Paul Ridker, Ahmed Tawakol, Joan Bathon, Daniel H. Solomon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13075-024-03352-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are associated with complex changes in lipids and lipoproteins that may impact cardiovascular (CV) risk. The objective of this study was to examine lipid and lipoprotein changes associated with two common RA treatment strategies, triple therapy or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), and association with CV risk. In this secondary data analysis of the TARGET trial, methotrexate (MTX) inadequate responders with RA were randomized to either add sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine (triple therapy), or TNFi for 24-weeks. The primary trial outcome was the change in arterial inflammation measured in the carotid arteries or aorta by FDG-PET/CT at baseline and 24-weeks; this change was described as the target-to-background ratio (TBR) in the most diseased segment (MDS). Routine lipids and advanced lipoproteins were measured at baseline and 24-weeks; subjects on statin therapy at baseline were excluded. Comparisons between baseline and follow-up lipid measurements were performed within and across treatment arms, as well as change in lipids and change in MDS-TBR. We studied 122 participants, 61 in each treatment arm, with median age 57 years, 76% female, and 1.5 year median RA disease duration. When comparing treatment arms, triple therapy had on average a larger reduction in triglycerides (15.9 mg/dL, p = 0.01), total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio (0.29, p-value = 0.01), and LDL particle number (111.2, p = 0.02) compared to TNFi. TNFi had on average a larger increase in HDL particle number (1.6umol/L, p = 0.006). We observed no correlation between change in lipid measurements and change in MDS-TBR within and across treatment arms. Both treatment strategies were associated with improved lipid profiles via changes in different lipids and lipoproteins. These effects had no correlation with change in CV risk as measured by vascular inflammation by FDG-PET/CT. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02374021.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03352-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03352-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

类风湿性关节炎(RA)的治疗与血脂和脂蛋白的复杂变化有关,这些变化可能会影响心血管(CV)风险。本研究旨在探讨两种常见的 RA 治疗策略(三联疗法或肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂 (TNFi))引起的血脂和脂蛋白变化以及与心血管风险的关系。在这项TARGET试验的二次数据分析中,甲氨蝶呤(MTX)疗效不佳的RA患者被随机分配加入柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹(三联疗法)或TNFi治疗24周。主要试验结果是在基线和24周时通过FDG-PET/CT测量颈动脉或主动脉动脉炎症的变化;这种变化被描述为病变最严重区段(MDS)的目标-背景比值(TBR)。在基线和 24 周时测量常规血脂和高级脂蛋白;不包括基线时正在接受他汀类药物治疗的受试者。在治疗组内和不同治疗组之间对基线和随访血脂测量结果进行比较,并比较血脂变化和 MDS-TBR 变化。我们研究了 122 名参与者,每个治疗组 61 人,中位年龄为 57 岁,76% 为女性,中位 RA 病程为 1.5 年。在比较治疗组时,与 TNFi 相比,三联疗法平均降低甘油三酯(15.9 mg/dL,p = 0.01)、总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(0.29,p 值 = 0.01)和低密度脂蛋白颗粒数(111.2,p = 0.02)的幅度更大。TNFi 的高密度脂蛋白颗粒数平均增加较多(1.6umol/L,p = 0.006)。我们观察到,在治疗组内和治疗组间,血脂测量值的变化与MDS-TBR的变化之间没有相关性。两种治疗策略都能通过改变不同的血脂和脂蛋白改善血脂状况。这些效果与通过 FDG-PET/CT 血管炎症测量的心血管风险变化无关。ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02374021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of RA treatment strategies on lipids and vascular inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: a secondary analysis of the TARGET randomized active comparator trial
Treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are associated with complex changes in lipids and lipoproteins that may impact cardiovascular (CV) risk. The objective of this study was to examine lipid and lipoprotein changes associated with two common RA treatment strategies, triple therapy or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), and association with CV risk. In this secondary data analysis of the TARGET trial, methotrexate (MTX) inadequate responders with RA were randomized to either add sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine (triple therapy), or TNFi for 24-weeks. The primary trial outcome was the change in arterial inflammation measured in the carotid arteries or aorta by FDG-PET/CT at baseline and 24-weeks; this change was described as the target-to-background ratio (TBR) in the most diseased segment (MDS). Routine lipids and advanced lipoproteins were measured at baseline and 24-weeks; subjects on statin therapy at baseline were excluded. Comparisons between baseline and follow-up lipid measurements were performed within and across treatment arms, as well as change in lipids and change in MDS-TBR. We studied 122 participants, 61 in each treatment arm, with median age 57 years, 76% female, and 1.5 year median RA disease duration. When comparing treatment arms, triple therapy had on average a larger reduction in triglycerides (15.9 mg/dL, p = 0.01), total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio (0.29, p-value = 0.01), and LDL particle number (111.2, p = 0.02) compared to TNFi. TNFi had on average a larger increase in HDL particle number (1.6umol/L, p = 0.006). We observed no correlation between change in lipid measurements and change in MDS-TBR within and across treatment arms. Both treatment strategies were associated with improved lipid profiles via changes in different lipids and lipoproteins. These effects had no correlation with change in CV risk as measured by vascular inflammation by FDG-PET/CT. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02374021.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信