护理疫苗规定:道德上合理,还是侵犯了自主权,抑或两者兼而有之?

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1177/09697330241262319
Christopher M Charles, Aimee B Milliken
{"title":"护理疫苗规定:道德上合理,还是侵犯了自主权,抑或两者兼而有之?","authors":"Christopher M Charles, Aimee B Milliken","doi":"10.1177/09697330241262319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After almost a year and a half of the COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare institutions in the United States announced that they would mandate COVID-19 vaccination, with medical and religious exceptions, as a term of employment. The mandates resulted in widely publicized protests from hospital staff, including some nurses, who argued that these medical institutions violated the ethical principle of autonomy. As the world enters the \"post-pandemic period,\" decisions such as these, made during times of crisis, must be reviewed to provide clarity for when the next pandemic occurs. In this paper, we support the argument that such mandates are ethically justifiable. We explore the framework of objections that were brought forward by dissenters of this vaccine mandate. Next, we provide an analysis of conflicting ethical principles present when such mandates were deployed. Utilizing the American Nurses Association's Code of Ethics for Nurses, notably provisions 2, 3, and 6 we argue that it is an ethical duty of the nurse to be vaccinated. Specifically, we turn to provision two, which most explicitly underscores the necessity of vaccination as a function of the nurse's primary commitment to the patient. Next, we highlight the International Council of Nurses Code of Ethics which provides similar guidance internationally. Finally, we examine the applicability of the principles of public health, care ethics, and the nursing role as frameworks to underpin such mandates both for the current and for potential future pandemics, arguing that the nurse's ethical duty to be vaccinated spans these contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"629-635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing vaccine mandates: Ethically justified, an infringement on autonomy, or both?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher M Charles, Aimee B Milliken\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330241262319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After almost a year and a half of the COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare institutions in the United States announced that they would mandate COVID-19 vaccination, with medical and religious exceptions, as a term of employment. The mandates resulted in widely publicized protests from hospital staff, including some nurses, who argued that these medical institutions violated the ethical principle of autonomy. As the world enters the \\\"post-pandemic period,\\\" decisions such as these, made during times of crisis, must be reviewed to provide clarity for when the next pandemic occurs. In this paper, we support the argument that such mandates are ethically justifiable. We explore the framework of objections that were brought forward by dissenters of this vaccine mandate. Next, we provide an analysis of conflicting ethical principles present when such mandates were deployed. Utilizing the American Nurses Association's Code of Ethics for Nurses, notably provisions 2, 3, and 6 we argue that it is an ethical duty of the nurse to be vaccinated. Specifically, we turn to provision two, which most explicitly underscores the necessity of vaccination as a function of the nurse's primary commitment to the patient. Next, we highlight the International Council of Nurses Code of Ethics which provides similar guidance internationally. Finally, we examine the applicability of the principles of public health, care ethics, and the nursing role as frameworks to underpin such mandates both for the current and for potential future pandemics, arguing that the nurse's ethical duty to be vaccinated spans these contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"629-635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241262319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241262319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行近一年半之后,美国许多医疗机构宣布,除医疗和宗教例外情况外,他们将强制要求员工接种 COVID-19 疫苗,并将此作为一项聘用条件。这些规定引起了包括一些护士在内的医院员工的广泛抗议,他们认为这些医疗机构违反了自主的伦理原则。随着世界进入 "后大流行病时期",必须对危机时期做出的此类决定进行审查,以便为下一次大流行病发生时提供清晰的思路。在本文中,我们支持这样的论点,即这类任务在伦理上是合理的。我们探讨了反对者提出的反对框架。接下来,我们分析了在部署此类任务时存在的相互冲突的伦理原则。利用美国护士协会的《护士道德守则》,特别是其中的第 2、3 和 6 条,我们认为接种疫苗是护士的道德义务。具体而言,我们将讨论第 2 条,该条最明确地强调了接种疫苗的必要性,认为这是护士对病人的首要承诺。接下来,我们重点介绍了《国际护士理事会道德准则》,该准则在国际上提供了类似的指导。最后,我们研究了公共卫生、护理伦理和护理角色等原则的适用性,并将其作为当前和未来可能发生的大流行病中此类规定的基础框架,认为护士接种疫苗的伦理责任跨越了这些范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing vaccine mandates: Ethically justified, an infringement on autonomy, or both?

After almost a year and a half of the COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare institutions in the United States announced that they would mandate COVID-19 vaccination, with medical and religious exceptions, as a term of employment. The mandates resulted in widely publicized protests from hospital staff, including some nurses, who argued that these medical institutions violated the ethical principle of autonomy. As the world enters the "post-pandemic period," decisions such as these, made during times of crisis, must be reviewed to provide clarity for when the next pandemic occurs. In this paper, we support the argument that such mandates are ethically justifiable. We explore the framework of objections that were brought forward by dissenters of this vaccine mandate. Next, we provide an analysis of conflicting ethical principles present when such mandates were deployed. Utilizing the American Nurses Association's Code of Ethics for Nurses, notably provisions 2, 3, and 6 we argue that it is an ethical duty of the nurse to be vaccinated. Specifically, we turn to provision two, which most explicitly underscores the necessity of vaccination as a function of the nurse's primary commitment to the patient. Next, we highlight the International Council of Nurses Code of Ethics which provides similar guidance internationally. Finally, we examine the applicability of the principles of public health, care ethics, and the nursing role as frameworks to underpin such mandates both for the current and for potential future pandemics, arguing that the nurse's ethical duty to be vaccinated spans these contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信